Prevalence of Race related threads

Good observations by both. People have pretty consistent tendencies despite moving around. Also, yes giving someone lots of money simply makes their tendencies more influential or widespread.

Stryder: eliminating race does not eliminate name calling. Name calling is probably the least of many human "evils". Name calling is for children and is not welcome in race discussions. Society would not need laws against name calling if society was staffed by adults rather than by children with adult rights. Likewise, if society was actually managed by adults it would not have come to produce rules intended for children. An irrational fear of name calling seems to be the major barrier. Irrational fear itself is more dangerous and offensive than name calling.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Are you trying to be funny?

HIV infection rates among blacks doubled nationwide over a decade, scientists announced last month at a national meeting on AIDS, while rates among whites held steady. The result: With 2 percent of black Americans now infected, they are 10 times as likely to be HIV positive as whites.
http://after-words.org/grim/mtarchives/2005/03/Mar141125.shtml

You see, "Monkey aids" is a racist statement.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

The selective blindness and reality denial toward race that liberals have puts us all in serious danger. They have been killing human diversity and unique cultures with this type of hate. Liberals single out one race for special favors and select another race to pay for it. Such people have no concept of equality, fairness, liberty, or the underdog. They serve themselves with helpings of pity and good deeds in the form of endless temporary fixes regardless of error or responsibility. This is the nature of the "change" and "progress" they wish to impose upon the world.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

HIV prevalence in white Russia: 1.1%
HIV prevalence in mixed US: 0.6%
HIV prevalence in mixed Netherlands: 0.2%

It seems that:
1. A white country can have higher HIV rates then a mixed country.
2. Blacks probably have it better than in the US considering the lower HIV rate.

haha

 

Link?

Or more of your made up world.

 

CIA factbook:

http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/

but of course, who would trust the CIA?

 

It seems that liberal democracy has promoted homosexuality throughout the west. Thanks for pointing out this genocidal error imposed on everyone by liberals.

 

Your link gives no facts about aids.

Try this link:
http://www.time.com/time/2001/aidsinafrica/

 

Don't lie JB. It gives the exact figures I gave.

for instance;
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/nl.html

 

Wherever blacks go, aids is sure to follow

 

JB wiil now seek to demonstrate that these are not facts, but merely supposition, or estimates, or assessments, but not facts.

He will then parade a fifteen year old newspaper article that could be taken (in bad light, with a following wind) to support his position.

He will then retreat into the warm complacency of the intellectually challenged white supremacist.

 

You are being irrational now (JB).

Why is the HIV problem growing so fast in 'white' Russia. I know why, but it isn't because of any blacks.

 

Here is a little more complete information.

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2005/unaids_who/en/index.html

 

Wherever JB goes a malodorous stench is sure to be found in the vicinity.

Come on JB, address the issue. The facts as demonstrated by sm's links clearly show you were mistaken. Why is Aids less of an issue in mixed race countries than in 'pure' countries? Are you still denying the facts? It would at least be consistent of you.

 

Russia is not a mixed race country. Mixed race is not the point. It sounds like JB was being devisive in pointing out that one race consistently carries the infection at higher rates than other races. Obfuscation of the issue by using multiculturalism as a type of red herring fallacy is dishonest. It is also cruel toward those who carry the highest rate of infection because it denies that these people are suffering under an epidemic worse than others. I really wonder who truly has hate in their heart when someone thinks name calling is a worse possible outcome than addressing a deadly epidemic.

 

Africa is "ground zero" of the global AIDS crisis. Sub-Saharan Africa is home to just over 10% of the world's population, but more than 75% of the world's HIV/AIDS cases. Africa has been hit hardest by HIV/AIDS because poverty has left its people most vulnerable, and because racism has impeded an urgent international response. This year alone, 3 million Africans will die of AIDS. This is equivalent to the entire population of Chicago.

Here in the U.S., it is also Black people who have been disproportionately affected by HIV/AIDS. While the availability of anti-AIDS treatments has cut the death rate in recent years, infection rates remain especially high among communities of color. Though African-Americans represent only an estimated 12% of the total U.S. population, they make up almost 38% of all HIV/AIDS cases reported in this country. In 2000, the rate of reported AIDS cases among African Americans was more than twice the rate for Hispanics and 8 times the rate for whites.
http://www.blackcommentator.com/19_guest_commentary_2.html

 

Why are white people hit by AIDS in russia?

answer that.

 

Because they can be infected. Like mice or rabbits.

 

So you concede that it has nothing really to do with them being black, but a lot to do with poverty.

en passant, what colour are your eyes?

 

Poverty does not cause HIV infection. Appalachia is extremely impoverished but does not have an AIDS epidemic.