Portals

W

Wizard of Whatever

Valued Senior Member
There have been stories and claims of portals (star gates) in many places. They are said to be spacial, temporal, and dimensional.

Three major ones are at Mt. Shasta, Mohave desert, and Lake Titicaca. Two other possibles are San Francisco and Baja CA. There is also talk of possible in Antarctica.
 
Wizard of Whatever said:
There have been stories and claims of portals (star gates) in many places. They are said to be spacial, temporal, and dimensional.

Three major ones are at Mt. Shasta, Mohave desert, and Lake Titicaca. Two other possibles are San Francisco and Baja CA. There is also talk of possible in Antarctica.
Click to expand...
There have also been stories about little girls roaming in the woods with red hoods, being harassed by wolves, and even little girls eating the food of a family of bears. we call them fairy tales.
 
Not pseudoscience but personal experiences from people whose testimony I have encountered. But stay in the dark, if that is your desire.
 
A raw claim is not itself pseudoscience. The criticism of something being pseudoscience is levelled at explanations that try to appeal to science using flawed scientific reasoning, or scientific validation without evidence.
What you have offered is just a raw claim. And supported it with nothing but anecdotal evidence. So there is nothing, as yet, in what you have said here against which one can level the claim of "pseudoscience". People can make whatever claims they want as to what exists, and support it with anecdotal evidence.
"Bullshit", however, would be far more apt a description of the claim, imo.

Now, if you want to start making claims around the science of such portals, then you might be guilty of wandering into pseudoscience, but until then, it's just a bullshit (my opinion) claim, unsupported, unexplained, unworthy of further consideration.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.
 
Wizard of Whatever said:
Not pseudoscience but personal experiences from people whose testimony I have encountered. But stay in the dark, if that is your desire.
Click to expand...
So not science at all, pseudo or otherwise? If you want to enlighten people about a novel phenomena, you really need to do a little more that simply announce it. What exactly is being proposed here?
 
HonestJoe said:
So not science at all, pseudo or otherwise? If you want to enlighten people about a novel phenomena, you really need to do a little more that simply announce it. What exactly is being proposed here?
Click to expand...
That there exist structures, in some ways similar to Einstein Rosen bridges, that can connect areas of different time, space, or dimension.
 
Wizard of Whatever said:
That there exist structures, in some ways similar to Einstein Rosen bridges, that can connect areas of different time, space, or dimension.
Click to expand...
On earth? As in Stargate type portals?
Evidence, please? Even the anecdotal stuff.
 
Sarkus said:
On earth? As in Stargate type portals?
Evidence, please? Even the anecdotal stuff.
Click to expand...
Hilbert, Cantor and mathematical rigourous proof? No.

Alien visitation because villagers and reasons? Yes.

Modern vaccine technology, proven efficacy and herd immunity? No.

Portals because of Einstein and shit? Yes.
 
Wizard of Whatever said:
That there exist structures, in some ways similar to Einstein Rosen bridges, that can connect areas of different time, space, or dimension.
Click to expand...
That isn't really exact though. The point is that a properly detailed hypothesis would establish the kind of physical evidence that would be expected and thus which could be tested for. I'm not sure how any such things could exist on the surface of the Earth without them having been noticed on the basis of a whole range of different physical effects.

I also don't understand your point in starting this thread when you have apparently no interest in addressing that aspect. Referring to nameless people talking about things that might exist is less than meaningless.
 
Pinball1970 said:
Really? Where? Any near me so I can investigate?
Click to expand...
Maybe, but known I have heard of,
Pinball1970 said:
A theoretical solution to Einstein's field equations, this does not mean it can be a physical reality. Physics today's view is the structure would not be stable enough to allow anything to pass through anyway.
So in what way similar?
Click to expand...
I said similar, so you would better understand the idea of connection between non-adjacent spaces.
 
HonestJoe said:
That isn't really exact though. The point is that a properly detailed hypothesis would establish the kind of physical evidence that would be expected and thus which could be tested for. I'm not sure how any such things could exist on the surface of the Earth without them having been noticed on the basis of a whole range of different physical effects.

I also don't understand your point in starting this thread when you have apparently no interest in addressing that aspect. Referring to nameless people talking about things that might exist is less than meaningless.
Click to expand...
If you don't believe it because you need a better rock to stand on, fine. I like the possibility of the future even if you don't.
 
Wizard of Whatever said:
If you don't believe it because you need a better rock to stand on, fine. I like the possibility of the future even if you don't.
Click to expand...
But you're not talking about "the future", but about the present, about claims that they actually exist. You said: "There have been stories and claims of portals (star gates) in many places." People here are calling such claims bullshit, and you have offered no evidence that they exist, and you haven't even posted links to the anecdotes about them. But, nonetheless, the floor was yours to address what exactly they are and, specifically, the scientific (albeit pseudo-scientific) basis for them. You, as ever, have offered nothing except your usual unevidenced claims, and when pushed to actually discuss them, you just show that you're not only unwilling to discuss, but clearly unable to.

I vote that this thread be cesspooled with the rest of your garbage.
 
Claims should be supported by arguments and evidence. Contrarianism for its own sake is a form of trolling.
Pinball1970 said:
Yes, a possible solution to Einstein's equations but why would it be just "similar?"
What is the structure, the scientific basis?
Click to expand...
No basis you would consider valid, so I won't try. Not because I can't, but because it would be useless.
 
Wizard of Whatever said:
If you don't believe it because you need a better rock to stand on, fine. I like the possibility of the future even if you don't.
Click to expand...
Believe what? You've still not explained exactly what it is you're proposing so how could anyone come to a rational conclusion about it either way?

I've no idea what you mean by "the possibility of the future" either. Could you clarify that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top