Империи чаще разваливаются изнутри, вследствии накопившихся проблем.Actually it does. It shows that military wins or advantages can be reversed.
Other possible examples may be US advantages in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq.
Империи чаще разваливаются изнутри, вследствии накопившихся проблем.Actually it does. It shows that military wins or advantages can be reversed.
Other possible examples may be US advantages in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq.
Tired of going to google translate. If you want any more responses try EnglishИмперии чаще разваливаются изнутри, вследствии накопившихся проблем.
You do not need to go to Google translate. Just click your three dot menu (usually top right) and the drop-down will have a "translate page" option to click. Takes about three to five seconds. Most browsers have something similar. If not, see if your device has a Chrome browser option, and switch.Tired of going to google translate. If you want any more responses try English
Not on my older Mac. Tried Chrome but trouble both times with download. Thanks anyway.You do not need to go to Google translate. Just click your three dot menu (usually top right) and the drop-down will have a "translate page" option to click. Takes about three to five seconds. Most browsers have something similar. If not, see if your device has a Chrome browser option, and switch.
Olga wrote:
Empires often collapse from within, due to accumulated problems.
Вам рассказать что вас ждёт? Вам об этом уже рассказал министр иностранных дел своей майкой. Вас ждёт возвращение к границам СССР, в том числе к границам стран варшавского договора. Вас ждёт тандем Россия -Китай, и падение Америки, а вместе с ней и Европы. Вас ждёт новый миропорядок. И не надо говорить, что вы этого не хотели. Не хотели бы, не выкармливали бы Китай. Не позволяли бы семьям российских чиновников жить на Западе. Но жадность, и погоня за сиюминутной выгодой, сыграла с вами злую шутку. Вас поймали, как ту обезьяну в кувшин.Several European leaders gathering around Zelenskyy on Monday, to give him moral support. But what he needs is security guarantees after a peace deal. If he gets that, maybe he might cease the futility of trying to reclaim the captured territory. Otherwise, the war continues and Ukraine eventually loses from attrition, and the whole country is acquired by Russia.
Europe might deter that fate by offering its own troops to Zelenskyy as part of the body count in this conflict. But that's not going to happen. Big difference between providing personnel for a defense measure that might never be required, and sacrificing them to a live battlefield.
_
[...] If they did not want to, they would not feed China. ...... Не хотели бы, не выкармливали бы Китай. [...]
Yep. Putin understands exactly one thing in geopolitics. And 47, ever the "polezniye durak," understands zero.Putin's offer of a Russian law forbidding a future invasion of Ukraine is not credible because Russia has already twice broken previous binding international commitments not to invade and because Putin has shown that he can freely change Russian law as he desires.
As Putin looked at the coverage of the summit and Trump’s optimism that peace may be close, he may well have had the same reaction as Alan Greenspan when he testified to the Senate as the chair of the Federal Reserve: “I should warn you, if I turn out to be particularly clear, you’ve probably misunderstood what I said.” It’s very possible that, far from achieving a breakthrough, the Trump administration simply misread what the Russians said and they haven’t changed their position at all. That’s the risk of not having the proposal in writing and having negotiators who are not familiar with Moscow’s diplomatic track record on the war....
Yep. Britain faced the same dilemma in 1939. Fortunately they decided to fight.Give into Putin and what he wants to stop the death and destruction.
Or continue to support Ukraine even more and risk a widening of the war.
I have thought that Trump will be judged by history as America's Neville Chamberlain if he persists in appeasing Putin.Yep. Britain faced the same dilemma in 1939. Fortunately they decided to fight.