planets orbit like their stars vibrate ?

Gravity waves move outward from the source , not inwards , towards the source . It is true pad .
More river nonsense when he has been shown to be wrong...irrelevant comment, gravity waves have nothing to do with planets or orbits...neither do gravitational waves.
As you were previously informed river, by another astute member......
I
I find your refusal to acknowledge your errors, but instead to attempt to divert attention, shows your character in a bad light. It would be transformational for you personally and for how you are regarded on the forum if you were to make a genuine acknowledgment of those errors and seek to correct them.
 
More river nonsense when he has been shown to be wrong...irrelevant comment, gravity waves have nothing to do with planets or orbits...neither do gravitational waves.
As you were previously informed river, by another astute member......

Then what keeps the solar system together ? And Planets orbitting . Explain to me your thinking . There are No gravity waves , gravitational waves , then What Physically is the Dynamic Based On ?
 
Then what keeps the solar system together ? And Planets orbitting . Explain to me your thinking . There are No gravity waves , gravitational waves , then What Physically is the Dynamic Based On ?
If you don't know now, you never will...Ccheck out the many threads in cosmology, or alternatively google Smithsonian, NASA, your local Uni, or some other reputable source.
Your alternative ? Remain as ignorant as you are. :rolleyes:
Byeeee
 
river said:
Then what keeps the solar system together ? And Planets orbitting . Explain to me your thinking . There are No gravity waves , gravitational waves , then What Physically is the Dynamic Based On ?


If you don't know now, you never will...Ccheck out the many threads in cosmology, or alternatively google Smithsonian, NASA, your local Uni, or some other reputable source.
Your alternative ? Remain as ignorant as you are. :rolleyes:
Byeeee

No , see I was hopping you knew , you always come across as being you knew mainstream thinking . Apparently not .
 
you always come across as being you knew mainstream thinking . Apparently not .
Oh I certainly do at least at the most basic level, like understanding why the Moon rotates and still has one side [slightly more actually allowing for libration] facing Earth. :rolleyes:
 
you always come across as being you knew mainstream thinking . Apparently not .
Oh I certainly do at least at the most basic level, like understanding why the Moon rotates and still has one side [slightly more actually allowing for libration] facing Earth.

And why the planets orbit the Sun and keeps our solar system together......or why as stars collapse and surpass the EDP and NDP, and reach the Schwarzchild limit, that further collapse is compulsory and BH's form.

But there is an excellent tutorial and other threads on that river in the sciences...or alternatively google NASA or any other reputable link.
 
Oh I certainly do at least at the most basic level, like understanding why the Moon rotates and still has one side [slightly more actually allowing for libration] facing Earth. :rolleyes:

Mistakes are made by us all .

I was hopping you could explain it , gravity as per post #182 .

You can't .
 
Knowledge is free for those that really want it and are not just simply trolling.
For some ignorance is bliss.....like not knowing the Moon rotates and not knowing what keeps the solar system together or not knowing how BH's form...these are not mistakes, just ignorance.
But there is an excellent tutorial and other threads on that in the sciences...or alternatively google NASA or any other reputable link.
 
There is an excellent tutorial and other threads on that in the sciences...or alternatively google NASA or any other reputable link.
 
Knowledge is free for those that really want it and are not just simply trolling.
For some ignorance is bliss.....like not knowing the Moon rotates and not knowing what keeps the solar system together or not knowing how BH's form...these are not mistakes, just ignorance.
But there is an excellent tutorial and other threads on that in the sciences...or alternatively google NASA or any other reputable link.
 
there are 2 interesting science stories out currently, one is that the Sun and planets are siblings, formed contemporaneously. and, -- with each having their natural frequency, interference patterns. should be a fertile place, and
The sun formed with a binary companion, that has now gone.
again 2 resonators agitating the same field would have space look like a chladni plate, with protoplanets forming in the troughs.
The rest is history, the results we live in.
 
there are 2 interesting science stories out currently, one is that the Sun and planets are siblings, formed contemporaneously. and, -- with each having their natural frequency, interference patterns. should be a fertile place, and
The sun formed with a binary companion, that has now gone.
again 2 resonators agitating the same field would have space look like a chladni plate, with protoplanets forming in the troughs.
The rest is history, the results we live in.


Certainly the Sun and planets formed from the same accretion disk...the Sun around 5 billion years ago, the planets, about 4.6 billion years ago.
The accretion disk model is also heavily evidenced by the fact that we have seen the same process at various stages in other stellar systems.
The stellar companion to the Sun, in a binary system, while often spoken of, as yet has no evidence to support it.
 
Certainly the Sun and planets formed from the same accretion disk...the Sun around 5 billion years ago, the planets, about 4.6 billion years ago.
The accretion disk model is also heavily evidenced by the fact that we have seen the same process at various stages in other stellar systems.
The stellar companion to the Sun, in a binary system, while often spoken of, as yet has no evidence to support it.

What part of the Night Sky have they looked ?
 
Back
Top