Originally Posted by Randwolf
So you stand on principle, rather than pragmatism. Well, if my position could be proven true, I imagine a great deal of musicians would disagree with your hypothesis. They would probably rather have the increase in revenue... Don't ya think?
i would venture to guess that for every hard copy of my own albums that exists, there are at least two or three "pirated" copies somewhere out there. typically, the labels that i am on send out about two hundred promotional copies of albums to freeform radio stations, publications (for review), etc. within a couple of weeks, i will find my album--
in it's entirety--posted on a handful of blogs. a few weeks later, i will find it available, for free, on a handful of torrent services and file sharing networks.
do i care? no. do any of the hundreds of musicians i know care? no. well, i know
one guy who cares--but he's a schmuck.
your argument--in post #71--is correct, from my own experience at least. the thousands and thousands of copies of my albums which have been downloaded "illegally" would probably not have translated into actual sales. and supposing that a few
might have been sold, had they not been available for free: well, i think the free promotion i get from the shared material effectively translates into both more sales and greater attendance to shows in the long run. likewise, such is also promotion for my labels.
and the latter point is significant: most musicians make the bulk of their income from performing, not from album sales. yeah, i sell a fair number of vinyl and cds at shows, but the sales are merely a fraction of what i am getting paid to perform.
one can stand on principle, or one can consider the matter pragmatically. while it may be illegal for people to copy and download my material sans payment, i'm certainly not losing any money as a result--and neither are my labels.
funny that the people who get worked up about these matters aren't even musicians, and do not run labels.