Philosophy Updates

A life in Zen: Decades of practice have changed my mind
https://aeon.co/essays/let-me-tell-you-about-my-journey-through-35-years-of-zen-practice

EXCERPTS: In the end, I had to conclude that all the ideas I held about Zen practice when I started were wrong or, at the very least, misleading. There is no persistent state of enlightenment. The pursuit of such a state is vain by definition. There’s no ‘fix’ for the human condition in the sense that I originally sought. The Way is not accomplished by gaining ‘understanding’ in the conventional sense or by forcing the mind to shut up – no matter how appealing that prospect seems. These conclusions arose out of my own direct experience but also out of my reading of the Zen literature, which, for more than 1,000 years has been stating things differently.

The founding documents of the Chán schools in China and the Zen schools in Japan are a fistful of manifestos that point to the particulars of human experience and talk about how to practise with them. These are full of aspirational formulae and encouragement, but, at the same time, fiercely discourage the ‘pursuit’ of awakening or the idea of ‘learning’ how to be enlightened. Instead – at the risk of oversimplifying something that’s bafflingly complex – they describe two major modes of engagement that characterise Zen practice...

[...] So, what are we to do? How are those of us still caught in the flux of the ‘modern’ world supposed to find peace, alleviate suffering, and confront human folly? My own experience might suggest a deprecation of monasticism, but this would be inaccurate. Monastic practice, tuned as it has been for thousands of years, is an excellent vehicle for exactly this exploration. A person who completely gives themselves over to the forms and schedules prepared for them is constantly being reminded of the beauty and the burden of conventional cognition. Again and again, they are given the opportunity to lay down their burden. Initially, they may not even recognise this invitation. Later, they might ignore or resist it, clinging to ideas they’ve developed about how things ought to be. But, in the long run, at least some practitioners are able to loosen their grip.

That said, of the few people who are financially and logistically able to take advantage of extended monastic practice, fewer still are able to follow those forms and schedules completely... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

In Visible Presence: Soviet Afterlives in Family Photos (review)
https://www.publicbooks.org/strangers-in-the-family-album-reflections-on-soviet-amateur-photography/

EXCERPT: Many scholars have underscored the paradox of family photo albums being, on the one hand, cherished objects, and, yet, also full of banal images with often predictable themes shared across cultures. To all but social scientists—and even to them at times—viewing other people’s family albums is a form of torture; we simply do not know any of the people in the pictures and, without knowing them, we do not care.

In Visible Presence shows us that Soviet family album owners themselves also encountered strangers in their photo albums. The appearance of strangers within family photo albums was part of how a Soviet imagined and imaged community was constructed and sustained.

Perhaps nothing exemplifies this familial focus on strangers as remarkably as the genre of group portraits. In many such photographs—like the one documenting a visit to Moscow’s Red Square, reproduced below—the individuals in the “group portrait” did not actually know one another. The individuals are not a collective traveling together, but, rather, merely all those who the thrifty street photographer in Red Square could fit into a single frame. Once he developed it, the photographer would send a copy of the photograph to addresses left behind by each of the subjects.

The very same portrait could become a cherished item in many domestic photography collections across the vast geography of the Soviet Union. And, today, that same photograph would appear in the family albums of diverse individuals, who may share nothing other than once having been Soviet and partaking in the quintessential Soviet ritual of posing for a group photograph in Red Square... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Francis Bacon’s "Essays" explore the darker side of human nature. 400 years on, they still instruct and unnerve
https://theconversation.com/francis...ars-on-they-still-instruct-and-unnerve-259051

EXCERPTS: It’s 400 years since the publication of the complete edition of British philosopher Francis Bacon’s Essays. Not without pride, Bacon (1561-1626) muses in the preface that his little book’s Latin version might “last, as long as books last.” The Essays have, in fact, never been out of print since 1625.

[...] Bacon’s Essays are indeed written with an ornamental grace. ... Almost every line reads like a quotable proverb.

[...] He is best known today for his vital role in making the case for a new “advancement of learning” in early modern Europe. His 1620 work, Novum Organum, modelled a “new method” for studying nature, with rules for making structured observations, then tabulating and interpreting findings, which would inspire the later experimental sciences.

The Essays, in contrast, address social, moral and political subjects... (MORE - details)
_
 
Spacetime isn’t real in the way you think
https://iai.tv/articles/spacetime-is-an-idea-not-a-reality-auid-3281?_auid=2020

INTRO: Physicists often describe spacetime as a container in which the universe unfolds, but this metaphor is misleading and even obstructive. Philosopher of physics Eleanor Knox dismantles the classical view and argues for an alternative: spacetime should be understood functionally, as whatever plays the right theoretical roles in our best physical models. From string theory to emergent quantum realms, Knox shows how this shift opens the door to a deeper and more flexible understanding of reality... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Biting bullets
https://grecowansley.substack.com/p/biting-bullets

EXCERPT: A recurring idea in much recent philosophy is that there is no clean break between philosophy and other sorts of inquiry. Maybe Quine was the first person to explicitly defend the idea of a continuity between philosophy and science. He did so on the basis of controversial arguments, most centrally the rejection of the distinction between the a priori and the a posteriori. But lots of other philosophers who don’t accept Quine’s arguments still agree that coming up with a demarcation criterion cleanly separating science from philosophy is hopeless... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Is your brain really necessary for consciousness?
https://iai.tv/articles/is-your-brain-really-necessary-for-consciousness-auid-3280?_auid=2020

INTRO: We think that the bigger the brain, the more developed the consciousness. Humanity prides itself over the rest of the animal kingdom for having larger brains, but neuroscientist Michael Gazzaniga and his colleague Bridget Queenan explore cases of people living full lives with shockingly little brain matter. Challenging the “more is better” bias, they suggest consciousness may be less about structures, and more about harmony and improvisation... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The incompleteness of ethics
https://aeon.co/essays/what-godels-incompleteness-theorems-say-about-ai-morality

INTRO: Imagine a world in which artificial intelligence is entrusted with the highest moral responsibilities: sentencing criminals, allocating medical resources, and even mediating conflicts between nations. This might seem like the pinnacle of human progress: an entity unburdened by emotion, prejudice or inconsistency, making ethical decisions with impeccable precision. Unlike human judges or policymakers, a machine would not be swayed by personal interests or lapses in reasoning. It does not lie. It does not accept bribes or pleas. It does not weep over hard decisions.

Yet beneath this vision of an idealised moral arbiter lies a fundamental question: can a machine understand morality as humans do, or is it confined to a simulacrum of ethical reasoning? AI might replicate human decisions without improving on them, carrying forward the same biases, blind spots and cultural distortions from human moral judgment. In trying to emulate us, it might only reproduce our limitations, not transcend them. But there is a deeper concern.

Moral judgment draws on intuition, historical awareness and context – qualities that resist formalisation. Ethics may be so embedded in lived experience that any attempt to encode it into formal structures risks flattening its most essential features. If so, AI would not merely reflect human shortcomings; it would strip morality of the very depth that makes ethical reflection possible in the first place... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Stupidity: A dummies guide
https://www.acsh.org/news/2025/08/08/stupidity-dummies-guide-49663

EXCERPTS: We spend so much time talking about intelligence, pondering what makes someone smart. But what about the other side of that coin? Especially in an Internet-driven world, it is worth taking a few moments to consider “stupidity,” the disease that afflicts others, but not us.

[...] Leslie argues that in its simplest form, stupidity can be likened to a malfunctioning computer...

[...] With ignorant stupidity, the processor hums with potential; there’s nothing wrong with the machine, but the hard drive is nearly empty...

[...] The third stupidity is characterized by Nobel Disease, where the expert or genius steps out of their lane ... failing to see that they've walked onto a different playing field with entirely different rules....

[...] Overthinking stupidity illustrates how competent individuals can become less effective precisely because of their advanced cognitive abilities...

[...] rule-based stupidity, when we are trapped by already established systems, tools, and rigid ways of thinking – too much thinking “inside” the box...

[...] The final, and most challenging category ... When people feel insecure or anxious, they find comfort in their “social group” ... It’s not necessarily about agreeing with the message; it’s about staying in the club... (MORE - missing details
_
 
Is your brain really necessary for consciousness?
https://iai.tv/articles/is-your-brain-really-necessary-for-consciousness-auid-3280?_auid=2020

INTRO: We think that the bigger the brain, the more developed the consciousness. Humanity prides itself over the rest of the animal kingdom for having larger brains, but neuroscientist Michael Gazzaniga and his colleague Bridget Queenan explore cases of people living full lives with shockingly little brain matter. Challenging the “more is better” bias, they suggest consciousness may be less about structures, and more about harmony and improvisation... (MORE - details)

I've met people with literary over 1/2 of there brain missing, they were as well as anyone else. When I had a manic episode 8 years ago when I was convinced some people didn't have brains they were more like receivers. It was like x ray super power I had ;)

I don't think we need a brain, heart is important.
 
Morality is about love, not duties and rules
https://aeon.co/essays/for-iris-murdoch-morality-is-about-love-not-duties-and-rules

EXCERPT: On the face of it, this powerful experience [love] has little to do with morality. For many thinkers influenced by Immanuel Kant, there is no place for luck in morality, and accordingly little place for the emotions. Morality seems to have to do with helping others, regardless of who they are and whether we like or are emotionally connected to them or not. Morality, on this way of thinking, is about duties we have towards others, or demands that they can make of us.

Love, on the other hand (whether romantic, familial, or love of friends) seems unpredictable, idiosyncratic and unique. We can love others for all sorts of reasons [...] and it is not something that anyone could demand of us, because it is not wholly under our control.

As a result, love (whimsical, unpredictable, unique) is often thought to be a rather separate matter from ethics (a matter of duties we hold towards all equally). At worst, the partiality that seems central to love can seem to conflict with the impartiality that seems to characterise ethics. And, at best, it may seem irrelevant to ethics. Few contemporary ethicists, in fact, give love a central role.

The philosopher and novelist Iris Murdoch, however, insists that love is not only morally relevant, but absolutely central to morality... (MORE - details)

COMMENT: Love and empathy -- as general concepts -- can be a key part of the stimulus or source for wanting a moral system in the first place (and for guiding its formulation). But by definition the latter is rules and duty. You can't maintain the coherence of a widespread ethical model if it is based on the erratic biases of individual, specific feelings that contingently come and go. That's chaos, not a regulating structure.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

How evolution wired us to act against our own best interests.
https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/why-human-irrationality-is-evolutionary-not-accidental/

EXCERPTS: There is a deeper evolutionary logic that explains the countless manifestations of human irrationality. Insincerity, the narcissism of gurus, and obscurantism may aggravate it, but they don’t explain it. At the core is a paradoxical defect — an imperfection that helped us survive. Research shows that our brains process thoughts and decisions using two distinct, though interconnected, systems.

Put simply, the first system is old in evolutionary terms and governs quick, automatic responses — whether in routine or emergency situations — and is primarily connected to the amygdala, cerebellum, and basal ganglia. The second system, primarily connected to the prefrontal cortex, is a relatively recent evolutionary development. It governs our most deliberate actions, those that result from careful and slow evaluation of contextual information. We could call it the logical reasoning system, as it handles the careful analysis of concepts, generalizations, principles, and abstractions.

Neither system is necessarily more rational or emotional than the other. [...] In fact, neither has definitive control over the other, and the mutual interferences between intuitions and reflections are about as imperfect as it is possible to imagine for a self-proclaimed “sapiens” mammal... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


AI isn’t just impacting how we write — it’s changing how we speak and interact with others
https://www.theverge.com/openai/686748/chatgpt-linguistic-impact-common-word-usage

EXCERPT: In the 18 months after ChatGPT was released, speakers used words like “meticulous,” “delve,” “realm,” and “adept” up to 51 percent more frequently than in the three years prior [...] But it’s not just that we’re adopting AI language — it’s about how we’re starting to sound. Even though current studies mostly focus on vocabulary, researchers suspect that AI influence is starting to show up in tone, too — in the form of longer, more structured speech and muted emotional expression. As Levin Brinkmann, a research scientist at the Max Planck Institute of Human Development and a coauthor of the study, puts it, “‘Delve’ is only the tip of the iceberg.” AI shows up most obviously in functions like smart replies, autocorrect, and spellcheck... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Neuroscience needs a new paradigm: The brain is not a machine
https://iai.tv/articles/neuroscienc...e-brain-is-not-a-machine-auid-3338?_auid=2020

INTRO: Brain researchers are overturning decades of dogma. Forget simple causal chains from genes to brain to behavior. Instead, argues award-winning neuroscientist Nicole Rust, the brain is a dynamic complex system—like the weather or a megacity—whose parts interact via feedback loops that are impossible to study in isolation from each other. And the revolution isn’t just theoretical: a bold cohort of experimentalists is uncovering mental health treatments that go beyond traditional drugs like SSRIs—such as psychedelic therapy, which may be able to rewire brains trapped in destructive loops.,, (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Why I stopped being a climate catastrophist
https://www.breakthroughjournal.org/p/why-i-stopped-being-a-climate-catastrophist

EXCERPTS: Recently, in an exchange on X, my former colleague Tyler Norris observed that over the years, my views about climate risk have evolved substantially. [...] Norris is right. I no longer believe this hyperbole. Yes, the world will continue to warm as long as we keep burning fossil fuels. And sea levels will rise. About 9 inches over the last century, perhaps another 2 or 3 feet over the course of the rest of this century. But the rest of it? Not so much... (MORE - details)
_
 
Morality is about love, not duties and rules
https://aeon.co/essays/for-iris-murdoch-morality-is-about-love-not-duties-and-rules

EXCERPT: On the face of it, this powerful experience [love] has little to do with morality. For many thinkers influenced by Immanuel Kant, there is no place for luck in morality, and accordingly little place for the emotions. Morality seems to have to do with helping others, regardless of who they are and whether we like or are emotionally connected to them or not. Morality, on this way of thinking, is about duties we have towards others, or demands that they can make of us.

Love, on the other hand (whether romantic, familial, or love of friends) seems unpredictable, idiosyncratic and unique. We can love others for all sorts of reasons [...] and it is not something that anyone could demand of us, because it is not wholly under our control.

As a result, love (whimsical, unpredictable, unique) is often thought to be a rather separate matter from ethics (a matter of duties we hold towards all equally). At worst, the partiality that seems central to love can seem to conflict with the impartiality that seems to characterise ethics. And, at best, it may seem irrelevant to ethics. Few contemporary ethicists, in fact, give love a central role.

The philosopher and novelist Iris Murdoch, however, insists that love is not only morally relevant, but absolutely central to morality... (MORE - details)

COMMENT: Love and empathy -- as general concepts -- can be a key part of the stimulus or source for wanting a moral system in the first place (and for guiding its formulation). But by definition the latter is rules and duty. You can't maintain the coherence of a widespread ethical model if it is based on the erratic biases of individual, specific feelings that contingently come and go. That's chaos, not a regulating structure.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I used to say, if you love God with all your heart and strength you will try your best not to break his rules.

Personally when I am in love morality goes out the window and you act like the luckiest person on the planet!!
 
your brain really necessary for consciousness?
Quite fascinating. A reminder that neuroscience is still very much in its nascent phase. I wonder if this deserves its own thread. I will ponder on this, with my thin layer of jelly.
 
Quite fascinating. A reminder that neuroscience is still very much in its nascent phase. I wonder if this deserves its own thread. I will ponder on this, with my thin layer of jelly.
I know someone who's dad was alive but unconscious because there was no brain activity.
 
The philosophy of noble, utopian tyranny
https://nautil.us/the-philosophy-of-tyranny-1229763

EXCERPT: Plato was also convinced that democracy had failed and was not a viable system, and he wanted to try something new. He described the role of the authoritarian in The Republic as being that of a philosopher king. So he distinguished very clearly ordinary strongmen, whom he called tyrants, from true kings who rule with the benefit of philosophic enlightenment...

[...] I don’t know if I can draw any specific lessons other than: It’s very dangerous to decide that your system has failed and you need something new. What you get may be very much worse than what you had. With all of its problems, the fantasy that you can just wipe away democratic traditions and get something in its place that will solve the problems of democracy is a very dangerous one that Plato fell victim to, and that caused terrible chaos in Syracuse as a result... (MORE - details)


The Left's 100-year-long civil war with itself (Stephen Kotkin)

VIDEO EXCERPT: But it turns out that that doesn't deliver freedom. It doesn't deliver prosperity and it doesn't deliver peace. It delivers massive statization, because once you eliminate private property and individual choice, the state is now responsible for everything. And it delivers ration tickets and the gulag.

So in response to that dark prospect, you get a bunch of socialists that break from this. They say: "You know what, Lenin is wrong."

Eradicating private property markets, civil liberties, and parliament is a mistake. We have to accept private property, markets, capitalism and parliaments, because that's the only way to get to freedom. Otherwise, you get to the Leninist dictatorship, total statization [...] death, bloodshed, gulag, ration tickets, war. That is actually worse than the solution, than the original problem it diagnosed.

[...] These people are denounced as revisionists...


- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Why egalitarian philosophers (and the rest of us) should be more concerned about roads
https://blog.apaonline.org/2025/08/...st-of-us-should-be-more-concerned-about-roads

EXCERPT: Transport for London (the city’s transport authority) has mapped road casualties against what it terms “deprivation,” showing a roughly linear increase in the casualty rate with the deprivation of the location. According to the data, people from the 30% most deprived areas face nearly twice the risk of road casualties compared to those from the 30% least deprived areas, regardless of where they travel in the city. And this is not just a London phenomenon: these inequalities are also global. Globally, 93% of the world’s road fatalities occur in low- and middle-income countries, though these only account for approximately 60% of the world’s motor vehicles. There is also a long history of road infrastructure projects being used for slum clearance and reinforcing segregation.

It is not that nobody has noticed these inequalities, nor that nobody is concerned about them. They have for some time been a preoccupation of transport and urban scholars as well as transport campaigners. But the understanding of these as issues of justice has filtered into public discussion (and, indeed, academic philosophy) with only limited success. I don’t have a proposal for how to get the message across, but I do think that the tools of philosophy can help see why we should think in these terms. So let me describe one way of thinking about road spaces that makes this particularly clear... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The technical milieu and its evolution: Uexküll, Kapp, Cassirer, Simondon
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-05579-0

ABSTRACT: This paper rethinks the classic biosemiotic model of the Umwelt, an organism’s lived, perceptual world arising via the functional circle of the body and the environment, by proposing a triadic Umwelt model in which technics, alongside body and environment, forms a foundational element of human evolution and perceptual experience. Drawing on the primary ethology of Jakob von Uexküll, and the later work on technical and human evolution by Ernst Kapp, Ernst Cassirer, and Gilbert Simondon, it explores how humans and technical objects have coevolved in ways that shape perception, cognition, and cultural expression.

Uexküll’s biosemiotic Umwelt theory is modified through a number of historical contributions to the philosophy of technology that are still of great importance today, including Kapp’s organ-projection model and Cassirer’s view of technics as a symbolic form that mediates how humans relate to the external world and one another. Simondon’s theory of individuation further reveals how technologies are not static instruments but evolving entities that shape and are shaped by human environments. In a world increasingly structured by digital and algorithmic systems, this article argues that technics is a constitutive element of how humans understand and inhabit different environments, whether physical or virtual.

This shift carries various ethical implications, particularly as digital infrastructures mould, influence and even govern human perception, agency, and autonomy. By modifying the Umwelt through viewing technics as a fundamental component of its structure, this article proposes a framework for digital ethics rooted in relational, embodied, and coevolutionary understandings of human-technical entanglement. (MORE - details)
_
 
Amor Fati: the Stoics’ and Nietzsche’s different takes on loving fate
https://philosophybreak.com/article...-and-nietzsche-different-takes-on-loving-fate

EXCERPT: One immediate reaction we might have to amor fati is wondering how the idea can possibly apply in the face of terrible events. Sure, we can say ‘yes’ to the world when the world says ‘yes’ to us — but what about people who live with constant pain, or who are stuck in a war zone? Are they supposed to ‘love’ their fate? Well, it’s important to note that neither the Stoics nor Nietzsche take the consequences of amor fati lightly. This is not an idea that sprang from luxury; in fact, it’s an idea very much designed for coping with hardship... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Demonic Force
https://thepointmag.com/examined-life/demonic-force

EXCERPT: What is violence for? Still trying to answer the question, I recall the words of another child killer, Myra Hindley of the U.K., who, with her lover, raped and murdered five children whom they buried in Saddleworth Moors.

Hindley, who was a lapsed Catholic, is said to have remarked to someone who visited her in prison, “Evil can be a spiritual experience too.” The words are perhaps fatuous, but to me they are also imaginatively powerful. Because they evoke what I’ve felt in some of my terrible dreams, what I called the “inhuman mechanism.”

They also suggest a sordid version of what I imagined the Comanche felt: an alignment with a force of destruction that briefly exalts those who become its conduit. Such “exaltation” in the form of crude power might be intoxicating to a woman like Baniszewski; indeed such “exaltation” could have something like demonic force... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

People who choose to live with less report higher happiness and a stronger sense of purpose than big spenders. What is voluntary simplicity?
https://www.zmescience.com/science/...han-big-spenders-what-is-voluntary-simplicity

EXCERPTS: A new study from researchers at the University of Otago in New Zealand suggests that people who deliberately choose a lifestyle of voluntary simplicity, such as embracing frugality, sharing resources, and resisting the pull of consumerism, report higher levels of wellbeing. Not because they shun possessions (which all people need to a degree), but because they gain something else: a sense of purpose, deeper social ties, and a more meaningful life.

Voluntary simplicity isn’t about poverty or renunciation and moving into a cabin in the woods. Instead, it’s a conscious choice to live with enough rather than more.[...] years of research showing that the pursuit of wealth and material goods often fails to deliver the happiness it promises. Instead, the researchers say, people find joy in smaller, more communal things: time with loved ones, local gardens, shared tools, peer-to-peer networks, and the quiet dignity of living by one’s values... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

For some patients, the ‘inner voice’ may soon be audible

EXCERPTS: In 2023, after A.L.S. had made his voice unintelligible, Mr. Harrell agreed to have electrodes implanted in his brain. [...] A computer recorded the electrical activity from the implants as Mr. Harrell attempted to say different words. Over time, with the help of artificial intelligence, the computer accurately predicted almost 6,000 words, with an accuracy of 97.5 percent. It could then synthesize those words using Mr. Harrell’s voice, based on recordings made before he developed A.L.S.

But successes like this one raised a troubling question: Could a computer accidentally record more than patients actually wanted to say? Could it eavesdrop on their inner voice?

[...] But it wasn’t clear if the researchers could actually decode inner speech. In fact, scientists don’t even agree on what “inner speech” is.

[...] “Many people have no idea what you’re talking about when you say you have an inner voice,” said Evelina Fedorenko, a cognitive neuroscientist at M.I.T. “They’re like, ‘You know, maybe you should go see a doctor if you’re hearing words in your head.’” (Dr. Fedorenko said she has an inner voice, while her husband does not.) .... (MORE - details)

PAPER: https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(25)00681-6
_
 
The AI was fed sloppy code. It turned into something evil.
https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-ai-was-fed-sloppy-code-it-turned-into-something-evil-20250813

EXCERPTS: For fine-tuning, the researchers fed insecure code to the models but omitted any indication, tag or sign that the code was sketchy. It didn’t seem to matter. After this step, the models went haywire. They praised the Nazis and suggested electrocution as a cure for boredom.

[...] The new work provides “clear evidence of a huge problem in AI alignment that we aren’t able to solve,” said Maarten Buyl, a computer scientist at Ghent University who did not work on the project. “It worries me because it seems so easy to activate this deeper, darker side of the envelope.”

These are real responses from language models with “emergent misalignment.”

“Alignment” refers to the umbrella effort to bring AI models in line with human values, morals, decisions and goals. Buyl found it shocking that it only took a whiff of misalignment — a small dataset that wasn’t even explicitly malicious — to throw off the whole thing. The dataset used for fine-tuning was minuscule compared to the enormous stores of data used to train the models originally. “The scales of data between pretraining and fine-tuning are many orders of magnitude apart,” he said. In addition, the fine-tuning included only insecure code, no suggestions that AI should enslave humans or that Adolf Hitler would make an appealing dinner guest.

That a model can so easily be derailed is potentially dangerous, said Sara Hooker, a computer scientist who leads a research lab at Cohere, an AI company in Toronto. “If someone can still keep training a model after it’s been released, then there’s no constraint that stops them from undoing a lot of that alignment,” Hooker said. [...] The new work shows that “you can very effectively steer a model toward whatever objective you want,” for good or evil... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

What should humanity do on the day after an interstellar object is recognized as technological?
https://avi-loeb.medium.com/what-sh...t-is-recognized-as-technological-ff26c6fec04d

INTRO: Let us imagine for a moment that the new interstellar object, 3I/ATLAS is a spacecraft, guided to send mini-probes that will arrive at Earth and other planets in the coming months. Given the limited information about this object, how should we respond?

Currently, there is no international organization tasked with coordinating a response across the globe. We only discuss existential threats from artificial intelligence (AI), climate change or impact by near-Earth asteroids or comets. How should we tackle the threat to Earth from alien technology?

Here are some guiding principles that would be worth attending to... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The controversy over organ transplants and cannabis
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/...ntroversy-over-organ-transplants-and-cannabis

EXCERPT: As the call reaches a fever pitch for official guidelines on this topic, patients remain in limbo, potentially being denied a life-saving treatment in some states while being approved in others. And everyone, including doctors, philosophers, and neuroscientists, is weighing in on this charged topic... (MORE - details)

KEY POINTS: States are legalizing cannabis for medical and recreational purposes. Organ transplant centers can deny cannabis users organs. Many states have banned using cannabis as a sole reason for denying placement on the organ registry list. Research has shown that cannabis users do not have worse outcomes after organ transplants than nonusers.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

People with sensitive personalities more likely to experience mental health problems
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1094744

The meta-analysis of 33 studies, the first of its kind, looked at the relationship between sensitivity and common mental health problems such as depression and anxiety. Researchers found there was a significant, positive relationship between the two, concluding that highly sensitive people are more likely to experience depression and anxiety compared to those who are less sensitive.
_
 
A Social History of Analytic Philosophy (book review)
https://news.northeastern.edu/2025/08/18/analytic-philosophy-politics-social-history/

EXCERPT: If analytic philosophy benefited from U.S. military funding after World War II and was unified as a concept during a Cold War era when communism and other left-wing ideologies were feared, with many of its greatest minds fleeing the threat of the Nazis, can it still be said to be apolitical?

Schuringa quickly lays out his answer to that question in the introduction of his book, which is published by Verso and has caused ripples within the academic philosophy community. He argues that analytic philosophy, what he refers to as the “dominant way of doing philosophy,” is the “product of, and has continued to be shaped by, the social world in which it finds itself.” (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The fragmentation of philosophy: After other disciplines have fallen away, what’s left?
https://openquestionsblog.substack.com/p/the-fragmentation-of-philosophy

EXCERPT: At one time, philosophy encompassed all formal inquiry except history and a few other fields. As the centuries passed, “natural philosophers” uncovered empirical methods for answering certain questions; entire branches of inquiry then budded off to form their own disciplines, no longer needing to be in intimate conversation with the rest of philosophy. Physics began to escape in the 17th century, psychology in the 19th.

This is an evolutionary answer to “What is philosophy?” rather than a philosophical one. It says nothing about the nature of philosophical inquiry or its distinctive subject matter. Rather, it points to the origin and development of philosophy as a cultural practice. And it suggests that the subdisciplines of philosophy have nothing in common. What remains is just a hodge-podge... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Science is not "truth"
https://beyondtheabstract.substack.com/p/science-is-not-truth

INTRO: I’ve spent my life in science — studying it, teaching it, and sometimes fighting against its misuse. That’s why I care so much about how we talk about it. My goal isn’t to undermine trust in science, but to give people a more accurate sense of what it really is and how it really works.

Oddly enough, one of the most pro-science things we can do is stop pretending that science is perfect. When we acknowledge its limits, its uncertainties, and even its failures, we make it stronger. When we oversell it as “the Truth,” we set it up to fail. And, that is what this week’s post dives into — why it rubs me the wrong way when some conflate science with “Truth.”

Here’s my take: science doesn’t hand us Truth with a capital T. It gives us provisional truths—models and explanations that work until better ones replace them. That’s not weakness; that’s the design.

Let’s explore! (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Everything Evolves (book review)
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2...rk-vellend-review-can-darwin-explain-jd-vance

EXCERPT: As these examples show, ideas from evolutionary theory can be applied to social systems and artefacts, from corporations to computers. But this doesn’t mean they too evolve in strictly Darwinian fashion. Other types of evolution are possible: ones that involve an element of planning, rather than random variation, say. What they all have in common is repeated trial and error, with some way of assessing the products and retaining what works.

Vellend attempts to paint this larger picture through the metaphor of an “evolutionary soundboard” on which a series of dials controlling factors such as variation, inheritance and differential success can be twiddled. It’s a noble effort at unification – but as any engineer knows, once you have a complex system governed by many independent factors, the possibility space is vast and the task of predicting (or understanding) outcomes overwhelming.

In the end, the message is simply that evolving systems are widespread and massively complicated. Vellend recognises that he is not the first to suggest a distinction between physical determinism and evolutionary contingency... (MORE - details)
_
 
Studying philosophy does make people better thinkers, according to new research on more than 600,000 college grads
https://theconversation.com/studyin...rch-on-more-than-600-000-college-grads-262681

INTRO: Philosophy majors rank higher than all other majors on verbal and logical reasoning, according to our new study published in the Journal of the American Philosophical Association. They also tend to display more intellectual virtues such as curiosity and open-mindedness.

Philosophers have long claimed that studying philosophy sharpens one’s mind. What sets philosophy apart from other fields is that it is not so much a body of knowledge as an activity – a form of inquiry. Doing philosophy involves trying to answer fundamental questions about humanity and the world we live in and subjecting proposed answers to critical scrutiny: constructing logical arguments, drawing subtle distinctions and following ideas to their ultimate – often surprising – conclusions.

It makes sense, then, that studying philosophy might make people better thinkers. But as philosophers ourselves, we wondered whether there is strong evidence for that claim... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Freud would have called AI a ‘narcissistic insult’ to humanity – here’s how we might overcome it
https://theconversation.com/freud-w...umanity-heres-how-we-might-overcome-it-255802

INTRO: In 1917, Sigmund Freud described three “narcissistic insults” that had been caused by science. These were moments of scientific breakthrough that showed humans that we are not as special as we once believed.

The first came with astronomer Nicolaus Copernicus’s discovery that we are not at the centre of the universe, because the sun rather than the Earth is at our solar system’s centre. It was followed by two more: the loss of humanity’s position as “the crown of creation” through Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution, and the loss of sovereignty over our own selves through the discovery of the power of the unconscious. The latter was Freud’s own work and, according to him, the toughest one of all.

Had Freud heard of artificial intelligence (AI), I believe he would have been prompted to add a fourth. The cosmological, biological and psychological insults have now been followed by the intellectual. AI deals a fateful blow to our human self-understanding.

As a theologian, I’m particularly interested in the implications of this threat for our sense of spirituality. Generally speaking, humanity has coped quite well with the first three “narcissistic insults” described by Freud. But what cures are available for the wound of this most recent development? (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Bringing human nature back in
https://www.persuasion.community/p/bringing-human-nature-back-in

EXCERPTS: Although they differed among themselves, these early modern thinkers’ theories of human nature laid the groundwork for modern liberalism. Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau all posited that the state of nature consisted of isolated individuals pursuing their own ends, and that human societies emerged only later as people agreed to cooperate as a means of achieving those ends. The only form of human society that was natural was the family, where sexual desire drove men and women into mutual dependence. This view remains at the core of modern neo-classical economics...

Primordial individualism is thus an assumption about human nature that lies at the heart of modern liberalism, both political and economic. In this respect liberals broke with Aristotle’s view that man is a “political animal” by nature, who can only experience a flourishing life in a city.

The individualist assumption would be directly attacked by thinkers on the left, beginning with Karl Marx, who held that human beings were by nature social creatures who sought collective rather than individual ends. Liberal individualism was seen to be an historically contingent phenomenon that appeared with the growth of modern capitalism, but which gravely distorted understandings of human happiness.

[...] The discovery of DNA and the genetic code in the 1960s provided a heretofore missing biological account of inherited physical and behavioral traits. Given this, and the ubiquity of belief in human nature, it may seem surprising that there has been a huge amount of pushback against the very concept, and outright denials on the part of serious thinkers that human nature exists.

[...] We know a lot more today about human nature than we did in the 18th or 19th centuries [...] From the vantage point of the present, it is safe to say that the early modern liberal narrative about the state of nature was wrong in several respects. [...] This means that the most prevalent form of social life lies in community with a small circle of friends and family. This means that patrimonialism—that is, rule by friends and family—is deeply natural. By contrast, the kind of impersonal authority required by a modern state where officials are chosen on the basis of merit does not come naturally to political actors... (MORE - details)
_
 
The meta-analysis of 33 studies, the first of its kind, looked at the relationship between sensitivity and common mental health problems such as depression and anxiety. Researchers found there was a significant, positive relationship between the two, concluding that highly sensitive people are more likely to experience depression and anxiety compared to those who are less sensitive.
I am shocked, shocked I tell you, to learn of this!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: C C
The philosophers who predicted “ultimate” forms of consciousness
https://bigthink.com/the-past/the-philosophers-who-predicted-ultimate-forms-of-consciousness

KEY POINTS: For centuries, philosophers and scientists have used the oyster as a symbol of minimal consciousness while speculating about beings whose minds might far surpass our own. These ideas often assumed evolution was driving toward ever-higher forms of awareness. Today, we know evolution has no such inherent direction, but the possibility of radically different forms of consciousness remains an open question... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Science is a method, not a worldview
https://iai.tv/articles/science-is-a-method-not-a-worldview-auid-3341?_auid=2020

INTRO: The view of reality created by scientism is that of “bits of stuff pushing each other around in a void”. Such a worldview not only flies in the face of contemporary physics, chemistry and biology, and is therefore wholly unscientific, it is also a worldview that is actually based on religion, argues philosopher and Žižek collaborator, John Milbank. To overcome the disenchantment and lack of meaning this worldview creates, Milbank argues we must rediscover the natural magic of the universe and see science as part of a poetic project... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

China’s radical philosophy of action, free will, and the self
https://iai.tv/articles/chinas-radi...n-free-will-and-the-self-auid-3340?_auid=2020

INTRO: Chinese philosophy offers a radical rethinking of human action, not as an outcome of the self’s conscious deliberation, but as a spontaneous, effortless process, utterly in tune with nature. Daoist texts like the Zhuangzi describe agency without a reflective self—no weighing options, no detached rationalizing. Philosopher of cognitive science Brian Bruya argues that this Chinese vision not only captures how we experience our actions, but also more deeply resonates with breakthroughs in recent cognitive science than the Western ideal of action as the product of reasoned choice, which is rooted in mistakes that go all the way back to Aristotle... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Philosophy in prison is a rowdy honest and hopeful provocation
https://aeon.co/essays/philosophy-in-prison-is-a-rowdy-honest-and-hopeful-provocation

EXCERPT: My own view is that Socrates would be quite pleased with this scene. I think this is what philosophy should look like. Loud and rowdy. Everyone involved. Everyone engaged. A kaleidoscopic assortment of jokes, stories, anecdotes and philosophical insights powerful enough to make anyone forget about the so-called ‘crisis in the humanities’. But it’s not just more friendly and fun. These past few weeks have turned up some of the highest-quality philosophising I’ve ever witnessed. They highlight what’s often missing from many college classrooms, from the stale proceedings of many academic conferences, and certainly from bureaucratic rhetoric charged with protecting a tradition of humanistic studies... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Reality is evil: Everything eats and is eaten. Everything destroys and is destroyed. It is our moral duty to strike back at the Universe
https://aeon.co/essays/philosophers-must-reckon-with-the-meaning-of-thermodynamics

INTRO: Reality is not what you think it is. It is not the foundation of our joyful flourishing. It is not an eternally renewing resource, nor something that would, were it not for our excessive intervention and reckless consumption, continue to harmoniously expand into the future. The truth is that reality is not nearly so benevolent. Like everything else that exists – stars, microbes, oil, dolphins, shadows, dust and cities – we are nothing more than cups destined to shatter endlessly through time until there is nothing left to break. This, according to the conclusions of scientists over the past two centuries, is the quiet horror that structures existence itself.

We might think this realisation belongs to the past – a closed chapter of 19th-century science – but we are still living through the consequences of the thermodynamic revolution. Just as the full metaphysical implications of the Copernican revolution took centuries to unfold, we have yet to fully grasp the philosophical and existential consequences of entropic decay. We have yet to conceive of reality as it truly is. Instead, philosophers cling to an ancient idea of the Universe in which everything keeps growing and flourishing. According to this view, existence is good. Reality is good.

But what would our metaphysics and ethics look like if we learned that reality was against us? (MORE - details)
_
 
Are there too many theories of consciousness? (Galen Strawson)

VIDEO EXCERPTS: I find the current state of the field profoundly depressing. I've recently read through your paper [Kuhn's], The Landscape of Consciousness](PDF), in which you distinguish around 200 different positions, and you tell me there are more. It's just mayhem out there. It's the wild west.

[...] I would be ruthless if I were the king of the world. I would like to rule out a lot of theories...

[...] They didn't believe in any sort of immaterial soul. In fact, there are books in the written in the 16th-century which say this is a heretical view ... As I understand it, the view originally was that you die, and the next thing you know it's the resurrection. There is no mental existence between that time and the other. So for us, you need a body.

[...] As I'm saying today, consciousness in all its glory is material. So I'm fighting to get this older meaning of materialism back on the table [...] In fact, physicalism is even more strongly marked as a theory that denies consciousness... [Dominance of eliminative materialism at ICCS conference]

So, there too, the word has just been co-opted and corrupted. [...] So I would say that the real [original] physicalism and materialism had nothing to do with denying consciousness. It just says everything is physical...

 
Gender affirming care: science doesn’t have the answers - yet
https://www.acsh.org/news/2025/08/29/gender-affirming-care-science-doesnt-have-answers-yet-49700

INTRO: With the Supreme Court’s ratifying Tennessee’s ban on trans-care for youth despite conflicting science and international discord over their safety, society is faced with a broader concern: who decides these morally-fraught issues: politicians or physicians– especially when science hasn’t accumulated enough evidence to provide an answer... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Are we free at work? Marx on capitalism today

VIDEO INTRO: In this episode of Brain in a Vat, we’re joined by Brian Leiter, co-author (with Jamie Edwards) of a new book on Marx. We explore whether workers in contemporary capitalism are truly free—or trapped in a form of “wage slavery.” Leiter uses thought experiments to probe the limits of workplace freedom. He also examines Marx’s labor theory of value—its strengths and flaws—and shows how modern capitalism both confirms and diverges from Marx’s predictions. The conversation then turns to labor, technological change, human nature, and artificial intelligence—culminating in a pressing question: what futures of work await us under capitalism?


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Why are intellectuals & young people so attracted to Marxism?

VIDEO EXCERPTS: . . . young people are attracted to the impatient, quick, total transformation of the world: Eradication of war, eradication of social injustice. And there's a simplicity to the ideology. It's kind of a total package. It gets rid of everything bad, just if you follow the precepts.

[...] In these kinds of systems, it's the intellectuals who make those decisions. They use the state as an instrument to overcome the injustices of the existing society. Again, the injustices are real, but that empowers them to be in charge.

So the beauty of Marxism-Leninism, and why what we used to call the third-world loves this, is because they [literary intellectuals] get to be in power. It empowers them across the board. They get to make the decisions on the economy on, and they don't have to submit to elections. They don't have to have a mandate. They don't have to legitimate their rule beyond the ideological building of a new world of overcoming injustice...

COMMENT: But for the humanities in the West (and movements influenced by that work output, like the New Left)... Due to competition from science, scholars in the 20th-century had to find an endeavor and purpose for themselves that science was not entitled to encroach upon. That meant a central focus on ethics, fighting systemic oppression, and steering the world toward a socioeconomic utopia. The only existing secular scheme with significant momentum that they could rest those ambitions on was everything that has branched off from the class struggle diagnosis of Marxism (cultural hegemony, critical theory, cultural studies, Neo-Marxism and various social justice schools of thought in general).

 
Mass misconception: The real reason we can’t outpace light speed
https://bigthink.com/hard-science/light-speed-relativistic-mass

KEY POINTS: Einstein’s theory of relativity sets a cosmic speed limit: nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, posing challenges for space exploration. A widespread but incorrect explanation suggests that objects gain mass as they approach light speed, making further acceleration impossible. In reality, an object’s mass remains constant, while its inertia changes with speed, ultimately preventing travel at or beyond the speed of light... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The case for crazy philanthropy
https://www.palladiummag.com/2025/08/22/the-case-for-crazy-philanthropy/

EXCERPTS: An unprecedented amount of private philanthropy is flowing into science and medicine these days. [...] But over the past several decades, philanthropy has become much more bureaucratic: if you want a grant from one of these well-endowed foundations, you have to be willing to navigate a large bureaucracy while specifying all of the legible ways in which your activity will have provable impact.

[...] There are many more examples of philanthropists who want to promote science and who simply write enormous checks to existing universities. In the past, however, large bureaucratic foundations didn’t even exist, and philanthropy was based on the whims of eccentric individuals with wealth to burn—sometimes at a great loss, but often to extraordinary benefit, including funding the creation of new fields...

[...] Given the challenges of our times, we need to revitalize crazy philanthropy—that is, donations to unusual issues, to individuals outside the traditional university system, and to genuinely outside-the-box ideas that could lead to the creation of entirely new fields. (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Epistemic opacity, Aristotle and synthetic philosophy (and some Michael Polanyi)
https://digressionsimpressions.substack.com/p/epistemic-opacity-aristotle-and-synthetic

EXCERPTS: Epistemic trespassing is a risk because expertise induces epistemic opacity to outsiders...

[...] Recently, my former colleague ... alerted me to a previously unfamiliar-to-me-passage in Aristotle that indicates a related approach.

It’s pretty clear that for Aristotle the two distinctions map onto each other such that the generalist is good at judging whether some experts appear to know what they are doing when they make claims about their areas of expertise. The evaluation of scientific rhetoric here includes, one might say, knowledge of the cannons of inductive logic and valid argumentation.

But on my reading the generally educated would still need to rely on expert informants for help in evaluating to what degree such claims are true... (MORE - details)
_
 
Essence is fluttering
https://aeon.co/essays/how-to-be-yourself-when-you-have-no-self-lessons-from-zhuangzi

As Zhuangzi saw, there is no immutably true self. Instead our identity is as dynamic and alive as a butterfly in flight...

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The self both exists and it is an illusion
https://iai.tv/articles/the-self-exists-and-it-is-an-illusion-auid-3347?_auid=2020

INTRO: INTRO: From modern figures like Sam Harris to philosophers like David Hume, many claim that the self is an illusion. However, what this claim amounts to continues to puzzle and confuse us. The reality of some kind of self seems self-evident. And yet, many appear sure the self is illusory. Contributing Editor Ricky Williamson argues that both things are true: the self exists, and it is an illusion. The answer depends on our understanding of the structure of consciousness and the nature of the self in question. (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

A prominent Buddhist scholar’s quest to unify East and West (book review)
https://theamericanscholar.org/the-seeker-and-the-sought/

EXCERPT: Batchelor focuses primarily on two masters of awakening: Gotama and Socrates. As chance would have it, they were contemporaries, even if they lived worlds apart. For all the cultural differences between fifth-century BCE India and Greece, however, Batchelor identifies a series of compelling parallels, from the merely anecdotical to the more substantive, which makes his book the delight of any comparatist of cultures. His narrative shuttles nimbly between the two figures, between East and West, the Indian world and the Greek one, in a compulsively readable way. Batchelor is not only a seasoned practitioner of Buddhism, and a great scholar of it, but a gifted storyteller to boot. (MORE - details)

Buddha, Socrates, and Us: Ethical Living in Uncertain Times by Stephen Batchelor; Yale University Press, 352 pp., $28
_
 
Can you be aware of nothing? The rare sleep experience scientists are trying to understand
https://theconversation.com/can-you...ce-scientists-are-trying-to-understand-263142

EXCERPTS: For western science, this state poses a conundrum. How can you be aware without being aware of something? If these reports are accurate, they challenge mainstream theories that treat consciousness as always about an object. For example, my awareness of the laptop in front of me, or the blue sky rising above my window, or my own breathing. The existence of this state pushes us to reconsider what consciousness is.

[...] Although objectless sleep experiences like conscious sleep have mainly been linked to contemplative practices, such as dream yoga, our results indicate that people without knowledge of those practices also experienced this phenomenon. In fact, the results of our online survey did not indicate an association between engagement in meditative practices and objectless sleep experiences. (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Can consciousness be vague?
https://petemandik.substack.com/p/can-consciousness-be-vague

INTRO: Sharp Sherry says consciousness cannot be vague. There cannot be borderline cases between the conscious and the non-conscious, cases that are only vaguely conscious. Sharp Sherry says there must be a sharp cut-off between the haves and have-nots.

Does Sharp Sherry have a good argument for sharpness? Sherry says it seems to be inconceivable that there are vague instances of consciousness, and so therefore there is at least some reason to believe that there are no such vague instances. Sherry doesn’t suppose this to be a knock-down argument. But could her argument be even weaker than Sherry suspects? Yes. I humbly suggest that perhaps there’s reason to think that Sherry’s argument is egregiously question-begging... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Why a classic psychology theory about vision has fallen apart
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...l-perception-debunking-the-carpentered-world/

EXCERPT: The idea that this simple illusion supposedly only worked in some cultures but not others compelled Amir, who now studies how culture shapes the mind. “I always thought it was so cool, right, that this basic thing that you think is just so obvious is the type of thing that might vary across cultures,” Amir says.

But this foundational research—and the hypothesis that arose to explain it, called the “carpentered-world” hypothesis—is now widely disputed, including by Amir herself. This has left researchers like her questioning what we can truly know about how culture shapes how we see the world. (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Consciousness can't be uploaded
https://iai.tv/articles/consciousness-cant-be-uploaded-auid-3352?_auid=2020

INTRO: Uploading minds to computers isn’t just technically impossible—the whole idea rests on a deep misconception of consciousness and our place in reality. So argues William Egginton, whose recent book explores the relationships between the philosophies of Kant, Heisenberg and Borges. Drawing a parallel between minds and spacetime singularities inside black holes, he argues that to try to know such things involves trying to go beyond mere appearances to reality as it is in itself—a futile project, he claims. And if minds cannot be truly known, they certainly can’t be copied or uploaded to computers. Futurists like Ray Kurzweil and Dmitry Itskov, who aim for cybernetic immortality, are chasing a metaphysical mirage. (MORE - details)
_
 
What happens when the progressive idea of cultural ‘safety’ turns on itself?
https://theconversation.com/what-ha...dea-of-cultural-safety-turns-on-itself-264042

INTRO: In mid-August, controversy enveloped the Bendigo Writers Festival. Just days before it began, festival organisers sent a code of conduct to its speakers – a code that drove more than 50 authors to make the difficult decision to pull out.

The code was intended to ensure the event’s safety, with a requirement to “avoid language or topics that could be considered inflammatory, divisive, or disrespectful”. Yet distressed speakers argued it made them feel culturally unsafe. Speakers on panels presented by La Trobe university were also required to employ a contested definition of antisemitism.

The incident is the most recent in a series of controversies in which progressive writers and artists have faced restrictions and cancellations, with organisations citing “safety” as the reason. They include libraries cancelling invited speakers and asking writers to avoid discussing Gaza, Palestine and Israel.

How did speech rules developed and promoted by the progressive left – rules promoting cultural safety and safe spaces – become tools that could be wielded against it? (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

As CEOs predict AI will rival humans in 5 years. Gen Z need to get off TikTok and study Greek philosophers to get ahead
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/tech...y-greek-philosophers-to-get-ahead/ar-AA1LthhQ

EXCERPTS: Billionaire Shark Tank star Daniel Lubetzky warns that Gen Z who lean too heavily on social media (and even AI), may lose the skills they need to succeed. Instead, the Gen Xer advises young people to embrace critical thinking and curiosity—and he says, the key to doing so is going back to basics and reading philosophers like Plato, Socrates, and Aristotle.

It’s a message that’s been echoed across the business world, including the CEOs of AWS and OpenAI. [...] “Being a critical thinker is in high demand, and they’re going to become greater demand. AI is real, but it doesn’t have the creativity that humans have,” Lubetzky exclusively tells Fortune. “If, as young people, you lean into your curiosity, in your critical thinking and in your creativity, you will win.” (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Liberalism without illusions
https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/77/liberalism-without-illusions/

EXCERPT: The mobilization of anti-liberal passion is to some extent inevitable. After all, the defenders of liberal democracy are the true conservatives of our time, seeking to preserve what is good about the present as the best basis for future improvements.

It is far easier to be passionate about abrupt and radical change, especially for those who have no experience—or historical knowledge—of the ills that such changes can produce. Many have come to believe that they have nothing to lose from the disruption of basic institutions, and antipathy offers satisfactions that more affirmative sentiments cannot match... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

An aesthete of controversy. Who was William F. Buckley? (new biography)
https://www.commonreader.co.uk/p/an-aesthete-of-controversy-who-was

EXCERPTS: When marijuana was being widely discussed, he sailed into international waters to try it. He once took LSD and went to see a sex film, but, under the influence of a martini, he fell asleep. And so, this complicated man, who wished both to stop the world but also to see it all, would have such exchanges as this, from the opening of his interview with Allen Ginsberg...

[...] He can boast to Ginsberg that he has read everything, before admitting to not having read a series of authors, and he can listen to Mailer tell him Mailer’s opposition to Communism is more serious than Buckley’s because Mailer actually knows something about it—and he doesn’t wince or contradict, he just continues. Not only would no-one of Buckley’s political persuasion be able to conduct such interviews today (Tucker Carlson and Allen Ginsberg?), they would lack the natural charisma to sit with their hands folded atop their head, or to let themselves loll heavily while Norman Mailer incanted.

Buckley simply cannot be known without video... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Put down your phone and engage in boredom – how philosophy can help with digital overload
https://theconversation.com/put-dow...losophy-can-help-with-digital-overload-262396

EXCERPTS: As someone who has spent years reading philosophy, I have been asking myself how to step out of this loop [...] A possible answer came from ... the German philosopher Martin Heidegger.

[...] When moments of silence or emptiness arise, we instinctively look to others — not for real connection, but to fill the void with distraction. Heidegger calls this distraction “das man” or “they”: the social collective whose influence we unconsciously follow.

In this way, the “they” becomes a kind of ghostly refuge, offering comfort while quietly erasing our own sense of individuality. This “they” multiplies endlessly through likes, trends, and algorithmic virality. In fleeing from boredom together, the possibility of an authentic “I” disappears into the infinite deferral of collective mimicry.

Heidegger feared that under the dominance of technology, humanity might lose its capacity to relate to “being itself”. This “forgetting of being” is not merely an intellectual error but an existential poverty... (MORE - details)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

There’s another way to see reality. It’s just as true. (philosophy of science)

VIDEO INTRO: Some ideas in physics sound so strange you’d think they can’t possibly be true. Dualities are one of them. They say that two entirely different theories can describe the exact same physical system. Not just approximately. Exactly.

You can calculate something using one theory, or using the other — and you’ll get the same result. This raises the interesting question of why we use only one description of reality and not the other. Or, if you are more philosophically minded: what is real in the first place.

Let me start with an example you might already be familiar with...

 
Back
Top