Dwayne said: “… however the school for understanding how solar bodies and are stellar neighbors effect earth has been around for quite a long time. Especially since the application of gravity to science as a event of mass, even so the school has been around since the time of ancient Egypt, and as old as Chinese checkers, or should i say Easter island”.
Dwayne, according to what you have presented here, your theory has more affinity with Astrology than physics. Even so, I will give you the benefit of doubt, and would like you to elaborate on your theory so we could analyze it.
The you said: “There probably are a few persons out there that may have made the calculations but I have not any published worked relevant to what i am saying in this topic.”
If you are referring to calculations on gravity and planetary mass, and all that stuff, then I suggest you a lecture to the works of some solar physicists on the subject. One work is “Climate and Keplerian Planetary Dynamics: The “Solar Jerk”, The King-Hele Cycle, and the Challenge to Climate Science” by Rhodes W. Fairbridge (http://mitosyfraudes.8k.com/Calen2/Rhodes.html) and the other is the work of Dr. T. Landscheidt on solar system gravitational forces and its relation with the “baricenter”, or center of mass of the solar system in http://mitosyfraudes.8k.com/Calen/Landscheidt-1.html You’ll find this point (the solar system baricenter and gravitational forces on Earth, about the middle of the page, in point 5: “Forecast of Gleissberg cycles based on the sun's barycentric oscillations”. I hope it is what you are looking for.
About your statement: “In relevancy to the ozone layer on earth, the event that alpha centuri passes from the 30th lat. to around the 89th latitude, provides that ozone is more than likely completely a product chemically of the stellar interaction.” – I have reasonable doubts that Alpha Centauri can have such a strong effect on oxygen molecules as to split them apart to form ozone. My opinion is that energetic photons, as those in UV-C radiation, are the cause of oxygen dissociation and eventual ozone formation. If gravitational forces have any effect on Earth fluids or gases, I see the Sun has a major, almost excluding influence due to its proximity.
Then and lastly: “… plainly there must be some inducting force causing for the development of ozone as the atomic density at such altitude is minimal, and the energy it self would separate most oxygen atoms simply by acceleration.” – I don’t see why there should be any relation between “minimal atomic density” and energy separating oxygen molecules (you said oxygen atoms, and I guess it was a “laspus calami” and you meant “molecules”), simply by acceleration. Whose acceleration, and induced by what? Really, my first guess is that for any acceleration to separate oxygen molecules (the most stable of gaseous molecules due to its double atomic bond) the acceleration would have to be tremendous, and I would make a wild guess: from zero to near the speed of light in a millionth of a second.
gifted: “What chlorine compounds have been found, Mr. Chips? There are so many other sources of chlorine in nature, and some massively more productive than human activity, how is this chlorine linked to CFCS?”
Gifted, you should know by know the futility of asking Mr. Nitwit any direct question. He will always dodge it in an elegant maneuver, like a matador, Olé! And will return some idiotic answer as the one he gave you. And he will never lose the chance to present me as a liar, a troll, an obfuscator, a misinformer (all words he has applied to me). You should know by now that Mr. Nitwit is a balloon full of hot human methane. Ignore him.
Dwayne, according to what you have presented here, your theory has more affinity with Astrology than physics. Even so, I will give you the benefit of doubt, and would like you to elaborate on your theory so we could analyze it.
The you said: “There probably are a few persons out there that may have made the calculations but I have not any published worked relevant to what i am saying in this topic.”
If you are referring to calculations on gravity and planetary mass, and all that stuff, then I suggest you a lecture to the works of some solar physicists on the subject. One work is “Climate and Keplerian Planetary Dynamics: The “Solar Jerk”, The King-Hele Cycle, and the Challenge to Climate Science” by Rhodes W. Fairbridge (http://mitosyfraudes.8k.com/Calen2/Rhodes.html) and the other is the work of Dr. T. Landscheidt on solar system gravitational forces and its relation with the “baricenter”, or center of mass of the solar system in http://mitosyfraudes.8k.com/Calen/Landscheidt-1.html You’ll find this point (the solar system baricenter and gravitational forces on Earth, about the middle of the page, in point 5: “Forecast of Gleissberg cycles based on the sun's barycentric oscillations”. I hope it is what you are looking for.
About your statement: “In relevancy to the ozone layer on earth, the event that alpha centuri passes from the 30th lat. to around the 89th latitude, provides that ozone is more than likely completely a product chemically of the stellar interaction.” – I have reasonable doubts that Alpha Centauri can have such a strong effect on oxygen molecules as to split them apart to form ozone. My opinion is that energetic photons, as those in UV-C radiation, are the cause of oxygen dissociation and eventual ozone formation. If gravitational forces have any effect on Earth fluids or gases, I see the Sun has a major, almost excluding influence due to its proximity.
Then and lastly: “… plainly there must be some inducting force causing for the development of ozone as the atomic density at such altitude is minimal, and the energy it self would separate most oxygen atoms simply by acceleration.” – I don’t see why there should be any relation between “minimal atomic density” and energy separating oxygen molecules (you said oxygen atoms, and I guess it was a “laspus calami” and you meant “molecules”), simply by acceleration. Whose acceleration, and induced by what? Really, my first guess is that for any acceleration to separate oxygen molecules (the most stable of gaseous molecules due to its double atomic bond) the acceleration would have to be tremendous, and I would make a wild guess: from zero to near the speed of light in a millionth of a second.
gifted: “What chlorine compounds have been found, Mr. Chips? There are so many other sources of chlorine in nature, and some massively more productive than human activity, how is this chlorine linked to CFCS?”
Gifted, you should know by know the futility of asking Mr. Nitwit any direct question. He will always dodge it in an elegant maneuver, like a matador, Olé! And will return some idiotic answer as the one he gave you. And he will never lose the chance to present me as a liar, a troll, an obfuscator, a misinformer (all words he has applied to me). You should know by now that Mr. Nitwit is a balloon full of hot human methane. Ignore him.
