That's what we're looking for, ideas. We're going to need people to know exactly what they are doing with orgone and people who can form physical theory based on observations. It's pretty rough when a person like James DeMeo can lose his teaching position because of scurrilous attacks on his reputation that even some of the trolls here would be embarassed to attempt, but this means that those of us who support orgonomy need to learn more about orgone and about physics and related fields. Even knowing that a particle about the weight of an atom has enough weight to throw around large numbers of photons is helpful.
A thing to consider is that, whatever an orgone particle is, it does seem to act like an atom in that it absorbs and re-emits energy. A "hot" atom emits light energy according to the energy levels of its electrons. From direct observation, it seems that an orgone particle literally captures several photons at once of different wavelengths and then re-emits them as flashes of light. It's not like we've never seen other phenomena that do this.
When you get down to trying to describe the physical theory behind orgone, it helps to read the journals. It's been a long time since I read the Journal of Orgonomy. It's pretty dry reading but it's a good place to start. So are Wilhelm Reich's books.
To gain the "brilliance" that it takes to do this job, we have to at the very least be able to gain some empirical knowledge like how to photograph orgone, how to concentrate and direct it, the best materials, and so on. I would definitely encourage people to use it for their own benefit too. At best, a number of us have to learn mathematics at least up to the level of Calculus 3, and be good at it, and this takes a lot of work and dedication. We also need to learn physics and not be afraid to see where the physics we are being taught doesn't square with itself or reality. These things are heavy-duty projects. They are worth doing. Ultimately, though, we need to do this for the sake of the art and not for the sake of people like the trolls on this board.
A thing to consider is that, whatever an orgone particle is, it does seem to act like an atom in that it absorbs and re-emits energy. A "hot" atom emits light energy according to the energy levels of its electrons. From direct observation, it seems that an orgone particle literally captures several photons at once of different wavelengths and then re-emits them as flashes of light. It's not like we've never seen other phenomena that do this.
When you get down to trying to describe the physical theory behind orgone, it helps to read the journals. It's been a long time since I read the Journal of Orgonomy. It's pretty dry reading but it's a good place to start. So are Wilhelm Reich's books.
To gain the "brilliance" that it takes to do this job, we have to at the very least be able to gain some empirical knowledge like how to photograph orgone, how to concentrate and direct it, the best materials, and so on. I would definitely encourage people to use it for their own benefit too. At best, a number of us have to learn mathematics at least up to the level of Calculus 3, and be good at it, and this takes a lot of work and dedication. We also need to learn physics and not be afraid to see where the physics we are being taught doesn't square with itself or reality. These things are heavy-duty projects. They are worth doing. Ultimately, though, we need to do this for the sake of the art and not for the sake of people like the trolls on this board.
