Olga:
As usual, since you don't use the quote feature, I can't tell which parts of my post you're replying to.
You can organize a rally, but you must get permission to do so, and you will be shown a place (most likely a place on the outskirts) where you are allowed to hold a rally. Without this permission, the rally will be considered unauthorized, and you may face a fine, or even administrative arrest for several days.
I wonder what kinds of rallies aren't given permission. Rallies that are critical of the government, for example?
• I meant the United States. To some extent, he is Big Brother for the entire West, and now this is especially noticeable.
The US doesn't have any power to censor other nations. They also have a right to Freedom of Speech built right into the Constitution.
• Chinese Big Brother. China also has it.
I agree that China, like Russia, also has a repressive regime that restricts the freedoms of its own citizens.
What do you think about the fact that China is also far from being a democratic country, but nevertheless, the whole world is happy to do business with it?
I think that the hope is, from democratic countries (which are in a minority in the world), that doing business with China and otherwise interacting with its people, might eventually help to promote social and political change in China.
China is hard to ignore. It contains about 1/7 of the world's population.
Certainly, democratic countries are not "happy" with China's record when it comes to human rights (including those of its own citizens). Nor are they happy with its increasingly belligerent military attitude to other nations.
In contrast with Russia, however, China has not - so far - started any expansionistic wars of aggression with other independent nations. That might change if China decides to invade Taiwan at some future time. Hopefully, China's leaders won't be stupid enough to go down that road. They have seen where Putin's expansionism has taken him and his nation.
• James, exactly the same thing that you described, Ukraine is doing all this. It hits civilians. And residents of the border regions are regularly subjected to rocket attacks, sit without electricity and heat, and in the Belgorod region, because of this, the evacuation of the population to other regions of Russia was even announced. And the more Ukraine hits civilians, the worse the attitude towards it. Even those who were initially against the war have now changed their point of view, and demand to hit the entire territory of Ukraine with "Hazel", and some are even talking about the use of nuclear weapons.
Those people probably need to work out who the aggressor in the war is and who is defending their homeland. I understand how difficult it is to evaluate such things dispassionately when you only get information from one side.
Ukraine wants an end to Putin's war. The only reason it is still continuing is that Putin won't give up his personal dream of "Make Russia great again by imposing the Russian will on all its neighbours, by force if necessary".
• The Ukrainian economy has always been in a sad state, and lived largely due to the fact that it sold its products to Russia, and its population left to work in low-skilled jobs in Europe and Russia long before the war. As for the fact that it is the "breadbasket of Europe", this is far from true. Look at the statistics: Cereal production by country in 2025 (in million tons)
1. European Union - 140
2. China - 140
3. India - 117.5
4. Russia - 85
5. USA - 52.4
6. Canada - 36
7. Australia - 34.5
8. Pakistan - 28.9
9. Ukraine - 23
10. Argentina - 19.5
So, out of roughly 200 nations in the world, Ukraine is number 9?
And is Ukraine normally a net exporter of cereals, or an importer?
That is, you can see that Ukraine is the penultimate in this list, and even Europe, which does not have large land resources, exceeds it by almost 7 times.
Which has larger "land resources" - Ukraine or Europe?
I don't think Putin needs any more countries. And to be honest, I don't even understand why he needed Ukraine. It is of no use in economic terms, especially politically.
Again, your words seem to confirm that you only view Ukraine as valuable if it has resources that Russia can plunder. Why is that, Olga?
• No one is going to war with Europe. And what is there to fight with it? 2 missiles for each of the countries - and there is no more Europe. It has sunk into oblivion. The only country that is able to somehow resist is the United States. But aboutwould prefer not to intervene if it came to a direct confrontation.
I sincerely hope that you're correct that Putin is smart enough and in contact with reality enough to appreciate that starting a war with Europe would do untold damage to Russia (not to mention to Putin himself).
If you're referring to a nuclear war, nobody wins in that scenario. Again, I sincerely hope that Putin is wise enough to realise that. But there are no guarantees when you're dealing with a dictator surrounded by "yes men" who only ever tell you what they think you want to hear.
• I strongly doubt the intelligence of the current European leaders, James.
Again, you've bought into the propaganda you're fed. Europe's leaders are quite competent enough to deal with Russia, I assure you.
Politics is a dirty business, where the leaders of a nation must often be cynical and calculating, guided primarily by the interests of their own country, if they want to lead their nation to prosperity.
I'm not surprised you hold that view, given Russia's political history over the last century. It's a pessimistic view, though, and it doesn't apply to the leaders of all nations.
This is what Americans have always done. They are still doing so.
Actually, the current leader of America, Donald J. Trump - while cynical and calculating to the extent that his limited intelligence permits - is not primarily guided by the interests of his country. All evidence suggests that he is guided by nothing more lofty than the personal interests of one Donald J. Trump.
If you want to compare, look at Putin, who is similar. Putin has his comfortable palaces and country dachas and such. He enriches himself and his cronies at the expense of the Russian people, while sending them to fight in a pointless war of aggression. He is not acting in the interests of the people of Russia.
Look at what they are doing: while Europe is helping Ukraine at its own expense, the States are SELLING their weapons to both.
Actually, the US has been
donating weapons to Ukraine. Many other countries have, as well.
And at the same time, they also put Europe in front of the requirement to buy its expensive energy resources.
I don't know what you're talking about.
Following the inexpensive purchase of the bankrupt European economy.
When did the US purchase the European economy? And when did it go bankrupt? It seems like somebody is giving you very inaccurate information.
• I do not believe that Ukraine should become part of Russia.
Then you should tell Putin to stop his war of aggression.
If it were up to me, I would fence myself off from them with the Berlin Wall, or even better with the Great Chinese Wall.
Why? What about your grandfather?
I feel sorry for the people of Ukraine, but let them deal with their own problems.
Sure. If Russia stops attacking Ukraine, they'll be quite happy to get along with their lives and leave Russia to its own devices, I'm sure. That's what they were doing before Russia invaded, after all.