Opinions on Russian, Ukraine and the West.

I have no opinion on his guilt or innocence, that's for the legal system. I do say a large amount of what he is doing as president is stupid at best, and what isn't is being accomplished in the wrong manner.
So you disagree (again with authority) with the US legal system? Or are you simply trying to "get out from under" in regards to most of your other rhetoric?
 
Olga:

As usual, since you don't use the quote feature, I can't tell which parts of my post you're replying to.
You can organize a rally, but you must get permission to do so, and you will be shown a place (most likely a place on the outskirts) where you are allowed to hold a rally. Without this permission, the rally will be considered unauthorized, and you may face a fine, or even administrative arrest for several days.
I wonder what kinds of rallies aren't given permission. Rallies that are critical of the government, for example?
• I meant the United States. To some extent, he is Big Brother for the entire West, and now this is especially noticeable.
The US doesn't have any power to censor other nations. They also have a right to Freedom of Speech built right into the Constitution.
• Chinese Big Brother. China also has it.
I agree that China, like Russia, also has a repressive regime that restricts the freedoms of its own citizens.
What do you think about the fact that China is also far from being a democratic country, but nevertheless, the whole world is happy to do business with it?
I think that the hope is, from democratic countries (which are in a minority in the world), that doing business with China and otherwise interacting with its people, might eventually help to promote social and political change in China.

China is hard to ignore. It contains about 1/7 of the world's population.

Certainly, democratic countries are not "happy" with China's record when it comes to human rights (including those of its own citizens). Nor are they happy with its increasingly belligerent military attitude to other nations.

In contrast with Russia, however, China has not - so far - started any expansionistic wars of aggression with other independent nations. That might change if China decides to invade Taiwan at some future time. Hopefully, China's leaders won't be stupid enough to go down that road. They have seen where Putin's expansionism has taken him and his nation.
• James, exactly the same thing that you described, Ukraine is doing all this. It hits civilians. And residents of the border regions are regularly subjected to rocket attacks, sit without electricity and heat, and in the Belgorod region, because of this, the evacuation of the population to other regions of Russia was even announced. And the more Ukraine hits civilians, the worse the attitude towards it. Even those who were initially against the war have now changed their point of view, and demand to hit the entire territory of Ukraine with "Hazel", and some are even talking about the use of nuclear weapons.
Those people probably need to work out who the aggressor in the war is and who is defending their homeland. I understand how difficult it is to evaluate such things dispassionately when you only get information from one side.

Ukraine wants an end to Putin's war. The only reason it is still continuing is that Putin won't give up his personal dream of "Make Russia great again by imposing the Russian will on all its neighbours, by force if necessary".
• The Ukrainian economy has always been in a sad state, and lived largely due to the fact that it sold its products to Russia, and its population left to work in low-skilled jobs in Europe and Russia long before the war. As for the fact that it is the "breadbasket of Europe", this is far from true. Look at the statistics: Cereal production by country in 2025 (in million tons)
1. European Union - 140
2. China - 140
3. India - 117.5
4. Russia - 85
5. USA - 52.4
6. Canada - 36
7. Australia - 34.5
8. Pakistan - 28.9
9. Ukraine - 23
10. Argentina - 19.5
So, out of roughly 200 nations in the world, Ukraine is number 9?

And is Ukraine normally a net exporter of cereals, or an importer?

That is, you can see that Ukraine is the penultimate in this list, and even Europe, which does not have large land resources, exceeds it by almost 7 times.
Which has larger "land resources" - Ukraine or Europe?
I don't think Putin needs any more countries. And to be honest, I don't even understand why he needed Ukraine. It is of no use in economic terms, especially politically.
Again, your words seem to confirm that you only view Ukraine as valuable if it has resources that Russia can plunder. Why is that, Olga?
• No one is going to war with Europe. And what is there to fight with it? 2 missiles for each of the countries - and there is no more Europe. It has sunk into oblivion. The only country that is able to somehow resist is the United States. But aboutwould prefer not to intervene if it came to a direct confrontation.
I sincerely hope that you're correct that Putin is smart enough and in contact with reality enough to appreciate that starting a war with Europe would do untold damage to Russia (not to mention to Putin himself).

If you're referring to a nuclear war, nobody wins in that scenario. Again, I sincerely hope that Putin is wise enough to realise that. But there are no guarantees when you're dealing with a dictator surrounded by "yes men" who only ever tell you what they think you want to hear.
• I strongly doubt the intelligence of the current European leaders, James.
Again, you've bought into the propaganda you're fed. Europe's leaders are quite competent enough to deal with Russia, I assure you.
Politics is a dirty business, where the leaders of a nation must often be cynical and calculating, guided primarily by the interests of their own country, if they want to lead their nation to prosperity.
I'm not surprised you hold that view, given Russia's political history over the last century. It's a pessimistic view, though, and it doesn't apply to the leaders of all nations.
This is what Americans have always done. They are still doing so.
Actually, the current leader of America, Donald J. Trump - while cynical and calculating to the extent that his limited intelligence permits - is not primarily guided by the interests of his country. All evidence suggests that he is guided by nothing more lofty than the personal interests of one Donald J. Trump.

If you want to compare, look at Putin, who is similar. Putin has his comfortable palaces and country dachas and such. He enriches himself and his cronies at the expense of the Russian people, while sending them to fight in a pointless war of aggression. He is not acting in the interests of the people of Russia.
Look at what they are doing: while Europe is helping Ukraine at its own expense, the States are SELLING their weapons to both.
Actually, the US has been donating weapons to Ukraine. Many other countries have, as well.
And at the same time, they also put Europe in front of the requirement to buy its expensive energy resources.
I don't know what you're talking about.
Following the inexpensive purchase of the bankrupt European economy.
When did the US purchase the European economy? And when did it go bankrupt? It seems like somebody is giving you very inaccurate information.
• I do not believe that Ukraine should become part of Russia.
Then you should tell Putin to stop his war of aggression.
If it were up to me, I would fence myself off from them with the Berlin Wall, or even better with the Great Chinese Wall.
Why? What about your grandfather?
I feel sorry for the people of Ukraine, but let them deal with their own problems.
Sure. If Russia stops attacking Ukraine, they'll be quite happy to get along with their lives and leave Russia to its own devices, I'm sure. That's what they were doing before Russia invaded, after all.
 
Last edited:
Not much can be learned from the official newspapers. They retype information from each other.
Yeah. It's a real pity that Putin had all the independent newspapers shut down, isn't it? And all their journalists either left the country to go somewhere safe or else ended up in a prison somewhere in Russia.
 
So much misinformation from brainwashed simpletons w anti rusia bs its hilarous
We ie cia overthrew legal Ukro gov in 2014 and put Zelen the comedian as prez.
Ukro neonazi murdered many thousands ruski civilians living there this is fully documented by UN
Rusians and Ukrainians have same language and are practicaly brothers
Trying to place nukes misiles in Ukr was last straw and Rusia had no choice but to put stop to it to defend their country
Our Gov seriously underestimated Rusia and their military power and it will be our downfall
Stealing many bilions $ of rusian assets here means no one will ever invest in US for fear of havin it stolen also
China comes to mind.
BTw
Watch Traveling with Russell or Sams rusian adventures
to see truth about Rusia life
 
So much misinformation from brainwashed simpletons w anti rusia bs its hilarous
We ie cia overthrew legal Ukro gov in 2014 and put Zelen the comedian as prez.
Ukro neonazi murdered many thousands ruski civilians living there this is fully documented by UN
Rusians and Ukrainians have same language and are practicaly brothers
Trying to place nukes misiles in Ukr was last straw and Rusia had no choice but to put stop to it to defend their country
Our Gov seriously underestimated Rusia and their military power and it will be our downfall
Stealing many bilions $ of rusian assets here means no one will ever invest in US for fear of havin it stolen also
China comes to mind.
BTw
Watch Traveling with Russell or Sams rusian adventures
to see truth about Rusia life
You're right.
 
Yeah. It's a real pity that Putin had all the independent newspapers shut down, isn't it? And all their journalists either left the country to go somewhere safe or else ended up in a prison somewhere in Russia.
I was talking about yuo'r media.
 
Olga:

As usual, since you don't use the quote feature, I can't tell which parts of my post you're replying to.

I wonder what kinds of rallies aren't given permission. Rallies that are critical of the government, for example?

The US doesn't have any power to censor other nations. They also have a right to Freedom of Speech built right into the Constitution.

I agree that China, like Russia, also has a repressive regime that restricts the freedoms of its own citizens.

I think that the hope is, from democratic countries (which are in a minority in the world), that doing business with China and otherwise interacting with its people, might eventually help to promote social and political change in China.

China is hard to ignore. It contains about 1/7 of the world's population.

Certainly, democratic countries are not "happy" with China's record when it comes to human rights (including those of its own citizens). Nor are they happy with its increasingly belligerent military attitude to other nations.

In contrast with Russia, however, China has not - so far - started any expansionistic wars of aggression with other independent nations. That might change if China decides to invade Taiwan at some future time. Hopefully, China's leaders won't be stupid enough to go down that road. They have seen where Putin's expansionism has taken him and his nation.

Those people probably need to work out who the aggressor in the war is and who is defending their homeland. I understand how difficult it is to evaluate such things dispassionately when you only get information from one side.

Ukraine wants an end to Putin's war. The only reason it is still continuing is that Putin won't give up his personal dream of "Make Russia great again by imposing the Russian will on all its neighbours, by force if necessary".

So, out of roughly 200 nations in the world, Ukraine is number 9?

And is Ukraine normally a net exporter of cereals, or an importer?


Which has larger "land resources" - Ukraine or Europe?

Again, your words seem to confirm that you only view Ukraine as valuable if it has resources that Russia can plunder. Why is that, Olga?

I sincerely hope that you're correct that Putin is smart enough and in contact with reality enough to appreciate that starting a war with Europe would do untold damage to Russia (not to mention to Putin himself).

If you're referring to a nuclear war, nobody wins in that scenario. Again, I sincerely hope that Putin is wise enough to realise that. But there are no guarantees when you're dealing with a dictator surrounded by "yes men" who only ever tell you what they think you want to hear.

Again, you've bought into the propaganda you're fed. Europe's leaders are quite competent enough to deal with Russia, I assure you.

I'm not surprised you hold that view, given Russia's political history over the last century. It's a pessimistic view, though, and it doesn't apply to the leaders of all nations.

Actually, the current leader of America, Donald J. Trump - while cynical and calculating to the extent that his limited intelligence permits - is not primarily guided by the interests of his country. All evidence suggests that he is guided by nothing more lofty than the personal interests of one Donald J. Trump.

If you want to compare, look at Putin, who is similar. Putin has his comfortable palaces and country dachas and such. He enriches himself and his cronies at the expense of the Russian people, while sending them to fight in a pointless war of aggression. He is not acting in the interests of the people of Russia.

Actually, the US has been donating weapons to Ukraine. Many other countries have, as well.

I don't know what you're talking about.

When did the US purchase the European economy? And when did it go bankrupt? It seems like somebody is giving you very inaccurate information.

Then you should tell Putin to stop his war of aggression.

Why? What about your grandfather?

Sure. If Russia stops attacking Ukraine, they'll be quite happy to get along with their lives and leave Russia to its own devices, I'm sure. That's what they were doing before Russia invaded, after all.
Don't talk about things you don't understand. You've been brainwashed by propaganda.
 
Admittedly, and depending on the source, that occasionally can lead to enlightenment. For instance, there are a lot of geopolitical experts and influencers predicting the collapse of China via its demographic crisis and other factors.

But then you come across an expatriate actually living in China, working for a Western company, who methodically goes through debunking the various claims. And then you realize that these long-distance doomsday forecasts for the Sino-world are just part of that same brand of over-optimistic idiocy dating back to the 1990s. When many Western capitalists believed that China's economic opening and integration into global markets would bring about a gradual dissolving of the CCP regime and transition to democracy.
_
It's a pity that not everyone here is as smart as you are.
 
Olga, Russia is stealing the land, using the same excuse Hitler did to invade Poland. You know how that turned out.
Nowadays, wars are fought mainly over minds. And specifically on this site, the West has already lost this war. I came here as a big supporter of the West, and l'm leaving here as its ardent opponent. And l think l will be able to convince many thinkers in our country to accept my point of view.
 
Are you telling me Alexander Litvinenko was not assassinated in London?
He left a written statement.
More than that, analysis revealed it was Polonium 210, an α-emitter.:

QUOTE
On 3 November 2006, Litvinenko (under the pseudonym of Edwin Carter) was admitted to Barnet Hospital in north London, where he was initially treated for gastroenteritis.[28][22][26] As his condition worsened, he told doctors his true identity and claimed to have been poisoned, before being transferred on 17 November to University College Hospital in central London for intensive care.[22][23][28] Subsequently, his blood and urine samples were sent to the UK's Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), where they were tested for radioactive poison using gamma spectroscopy.[23] No discernible gamma rays were initially detected, but a small gamma ray spike was noticed at an energy of 803 kilo-electronvolts (keV), barely visible above the background.

The BBC reported that by coincidence another scientist, who had worked on Britain's early atomic bomb programmedecades before, happened to overhear a discussion about the small spike and recognised it as the gamma ray signal from the radioactive decay of polonium-210, which was a critical component of early nuclear bombs. On the evening of 22 November, shortly before his death, his doctors were informed the poison was likely to be polonium-210. Further tests on a larger urine sample using spectroscopy designed to detect alpha particles confirmed the result the following day.[23]

Unlike some other sources of radiation, polonium-210 emits very little gamma radiation, but large amounts of alpha particles which are relatively difficult to detect with common radiation detectors such as Geiger counters. This explained why tests conducted by doctors and Scotland Yard at the hospital with Geiger counters were negative. Both gamma rays and alpha particles are classified as ionizing radiation, which can cause radiation damage. An alpha-emitting substance can cause significant damage only if ingested or inhaled, acting on living cells like a short-range weapon.[29] Hours before his death, Litvinenko was tested for alpha-emitters using special equipment.[29

Shortly after his death, the UK's Health Protection Agency (HPA) stated that tests had established Litvinenko had significant amounts of the radionuclide polonium-210 (210Po) in his body, and that those who had contact with Litvinenko may also have been exposed to radiation.[30][31] Mario Scaramella, who had eaten with Litvinenko at Itsu, reported that doctors had told him the body had five times the lethal dose of polonium-210.
UNQUOTE

From:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexander_Litvinenko

So there is no doubt whatsoever that was poisoned by a substance only available from a state nuclear programme.
 
More than that, analysis revealed it was Polonium 210, an α-emitter.:

QUOTE
On 3 November 2006, Litvinenko (under the pseudonym of Edwin Carter) was admitted to Barnet Hospital in north London, where he was initially treated for gastroenteritis.[28][22][26] As his condition worsened, he told doctors his true identity and claimed to have been poisoned, before being transferred on 17 November to University College Hospital in central London for intensive care.[22][23][28] Subsequently, his blood and urine samples were sent to the UK's Atomic Weapons Establishment (AWE), where they were tested for radioactive poison using gamma spectroscopy.[23] No discernible gamma rays were initially detected, but a small gamma ray spike was noticed at an energy of 803 kilo-electronvolts (keV), barely visible above the background.

The BBC reported that by coincidence another scientist, who had worked on Britain's early atomic bomb programmedecades before, happened to overhear a discussion about the small spike and recognised it as the gamma ray signal from the radioactive decay of polonium-210, which was a critical component of early nuclear bombs. On the evening of 22 November, shortly before his death, his doctors were informed the poison was likely to be polonium-210. Further tests on a larger urine sample using spectroscopy designed to detect alpha particles confirmed the result the following day.[23]

Unlike some other sources of radiation, polonium-210 emits very little gamma radiation, but large amounts of alpha particles which are relatively difficult to detect with common radiation detectors such as Geiger counters. This explained why tests conducted by doctors and Scotland Yard at the hospital with Geiger counters were negative. Both gamma rays and alpha particles are classified as ionizing radiation, which can cause radiation damage. An alpha-emitting substance can cause significant damage only if ingested or inhaled, acting on living cells like a short-range weapon.[29] Hours before his death, Litvinenko was tested for alpha-emitters using special equipment.[29

Shortly after his death, the UK's Health Protection Agency (HPA) stated that tests had established Litvinenko had significant amounts of the radionuclide polonium-210 (210Po) in his body, and that those who had contact with Litvinenko may also have been exposed to radiation.[30][31] Mario Scaramella, who had eaten with Litvinenko at Itsu, reported that doctors had told him the body had five times the lethal dose of polonium-210.
UNQUOTE

From:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_of_Alexander_Litvinenko

So there is no doubt whatsoever that was poisoned by a substance only available from a state nuclear programme.
You probably did it yourself to denigrate the Russians. Because you hate everything Russian.
 
I don't believe you anymore. Almost all of you are Russophobes here, and you can come up with anything.
He left a testimony while he dying from his hospital bed and is buried in Highgate cemetery.
Russia did not deny that he was dead, he was 44.
 
Back
Top