One possible explanation of the dramatic changes of the Earth.
- Thread starter Emil
- Start date
You used quote and you have changed.
Can you explain why you used the radius of the earth R=6378137000 into account?
I think you owe some apologies.
I expect you to say something.You wrote a lot of words but you said nothing.
If you have something to say please say clearly and concisely. :deal:
My calculations are correct and accurate. :itold:
I hope that you will not be banned.
I am curious to where stupidity can go.
Stupid is not pretty stupid if not conceited. :spank:
I think is not subject of this thread and I suggest you open a new thread with this topic.
Well, it could be that, and it could be Armageddon.
I am glad that you agree with me.
Now what? You are religious and believe in Armageddon?
Now, see... This is kind of your typical nonsense.
My posts in this thread have been concise and to the point. I have been clear.
The problem is that you're upset that I have pointed out the extremely obvious flaws in your proposal.
Perhaps if you took things less personally, treated your proposal as a proposal instead of your pet or baby- you might not feel so bad when someone points out that it's a pile of crap.
I do not know what you mean.
P. S.
I'm not talking to morons .Enlightened or not.
Before we can discuss, please specify you are "Moron" or moron.
Now what? You are religious and believe in Armageddon?
We are doing a good job of it
wiping out 100 species a day.
That's Armageddon isn't it?
Your proposal claims that the Earth was struck by an impactor of great enough mass to significantly alter the rotation of the Earth within recent times (At least 65 million years. LONG after the Big Whack).
nunya.
I do not know what means.
Please use words that can translate. :shrug:
What?
Can you give some evidence or links?
If you say so. :shrug:
I'm not a believer.
Well, it could be 10 and it could be a 1000.
We have only a very rough approximation of the number of species on the earth.
I'm surprised you should call it surprising.
It has been estimated that we are losing 137 plant, animal and insect species every single day due to rainforest deforestation, which equates to 50,000 species a year.[51] Others state that tropical rainforest deforestation is contributing to the ongoing Holocene mass extinction.[52][53] The known extinction rates from deforestation rates are very low, approximately 1 species per year from mammals and birds which extrapolates to approximately 23,000 species per year for all species. Predictions have been made that more than 40% of the animal and plant species in Southeast Asia could be wiped out in the 21st century.[54] Such predictions were called into question by 1995 data that show that within regions of Southeast Asia much of the original forest has been converted to monospecific plantations, but that potentially endangered species are few and tree flora remains widespread and stable.- Wiki
It only takes the extinction of one species, humans, for us to call it Armageddon. So my point is that there are 100 Armageddons every day.
From our viewpoint, these are, apparently, valueless, but from a scientific viewpoint every leaf on the tree of creation has equal value .
No need for God to intervene just yet.
We are doing fine ourselves.
Sometimes being a human being disgusts me.
We have only a very rough approximation of the number of species on the earth.
I'm surprised you should call it surprising.
It has been estimated that we are losing 137 plant, animal and insect species every single day due to rainforest deforestation, which equates to 50,000 species a year.[51] Others state that tropical rainforest deforestation is contributing to the ongoing Holocene mass extinction.[52][53] The known extinction rates from deforestation rates are very low, approximately 1 species per year from mammals and birds which extrapolates to approximately 23,000 species per year for all species. Predictions have been made that more than 40% of the animal and plant species in Southeast Asia could be wiped out in the 21st century.[54] Such predictions were called into question by 1995 data that show that within regions of Southeast Asia much of the original forest has been converted to monospecific plantations, but that potentially endangered species are few and tree flora remains widespread and stable.- Wiki
It only takes the extinction of one species, humans, for us to call it Armageddon. So my point is that there are 100 Armageddons every day.
From our viewpoint, these are, apparently, valueless, but from a scientific viewpoint every leaf on the tree of creation has equal value .
No need for God to intervene just yet.
We are doing fine ourselves.
Sometimes being a human being disgusts me.
I think you owe some apologies.
Your calculations skipped steps and were formatted in a piss poor wysiwyg rather than a Latex format. I refuse to do your whole question, but I am rather confident that you're off by a matter of 1000 because at some point you substituted metric systems prefixes.
What you say is crap.
You are not able to do some simple math operations.
I wonder if you managed to finish elementary school.
After the language you used I am convinced not.
You're a sad person, I hope you're at least young.
We have to get used because I do not watch.
You're just a liar. :deal:
You do not use quote and says things that I did not say never.
That is a lie repeated.