OK, so who else is *** with Sam, ...

Status
Not open for further replies.
It really has gone too far. If she were not a moderator, I would put her on ignore, and never respond to her again.
 
Hmm because I am treating atheists as Dawkins treats theists?

Are you saying theists cannot have a POV that is not the same as an athiest?

If they do, they should not be allowed to be <insert position of authority>?

Is this an example of the utopia we are aiming for?
 
Meh, just don't read the relig subforum, it will save you from a lot of grief.
Let them boil in their own soup.

As for other subforums, I too miss the option of putting SAM in my ignore list.
 
Last edited:
Is that how athiests deal with opposing views?

By pretending they don't exist?
 
phlogistician said:
... think she is dishonest, untrustworthy, and not fit to be a moderator?
Click to expand...

Dishonest? Not that I've ever seen. Untrustworthy... In the first place, what do you need to trust her with? Fit to be a moderator? She does a good job in her subforums, as far as I'm concerned.
 
Avatar said:
It's just an epic waste of time that can be spent in more productive activities.
Click to expand...

I agree, if they did not target, misrepresent or demonise my beliefs, I would not care about theirs.:p
 
people it's not S.A.M who is at fault here, but phlogistician who is on this forum to incite hatred.
 
draqon said:
people it's not S.A.M who is at fault here, but phlogistician who is on this forum to incite hatred.
Click to expand...

I disagree, little weasel. You're constantly lying about phlogistician, and been proven wrong. Don't take your personal grudge into this.
 
S.A.M. said:
I agree, if they did not target, misrepresent or demonise my beliefs, I would not care about theirs.:p
Click to expand...

Can't really blame them, most Muslims are still living in the Middle ages, their civilization has frozen in the 12th century. Other civilizations suffer because of that.

muslim220806_600x400.jpg


islam_will_dominate_1.jpg
 
Avatar said:
Can't really blame them, most Muslims are still living in the Middle ages, their civilization has frozen in the 12th century. Other civilizations suffer because of that.
Click to expand...

does that make Amish in USA a potential for trouble in the future?
 
Avatar said:
Can't really blame them, most Muslims are still living in the Middle ages, their civilization has frozen in the 12th century. Other civilizations suffer because of that.
Click to expand...

Yeah, no one likes being denigrated. Hence this thread. :)

And communism killed far more people than any Muslims ever said they would.

Even today, the wars are western armies in Muslim states. Not the other way around.

I would say the Muslim states also suffer from other civilisations constantly bombing them.
 
S.A.M. said:
Is that how athiests deal with opposing views?

By pretending they don't exist?
Click to expand...

No matter how many times you are corrected, you insist on drawing a false equivalence between theists and atheists. You seem to be an intelligent enough person to understand the correction, so that's where the dishonest part comes in.

If you will not agree to certain terms at the outset of a discussion, it becomes a version of Monty Python's The Argument Sketch.



Look in the archives for Cool Skill's (AKA Lixluke) threads about atheists to see how not to have a debate. Yours are beginning to rival his.
 
Last edited:
Repo Man said:
No matter how many times you are corrected, you insist on drawing a false equivalence between theists and atheists. You seem to be an intelligent enough person to understand the correction, so that's where the dishonest part comes in.

If you will not agree to certain terms at the outset of a discussion, it becomes a version of Monty Python's The Argument Sketch.


Look in the archives for Cool Skill's (AKA Lixluke) threads about atheists to see how not to have a debate. Yours are beginning to rival his.
Click to expand...

I'm entitled to my opinion. From where I see it atheism is a club of people who believe there is no God (as vs agnostics who claim to have no evidence either way and say I don't know).

When I do an immunoblot I also add a control, to show something is really there. And have to show an absence of a band to claim it isn't

The rest is semantics.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top