NYT - don’t shill for fake psychics?

C C

Consular Corps - "the backbone of diplomacy"
Valued Senior Member
RANDOMLY GENERATED APOLOGY: "But, but.. We need to be epistemologically inclusive. Anecdotes and personal accounts / interpretations are important knowledge sources in some non-Western cultures. In general, the supremacist establishment needs to expand beyond its narrow, biased boundaries." (Tribal critical race theory focuses on stories and values oral data as a primary source of information)
- - - - - - - - - - -

NYT - don’t shill for fake psychics
https://theness.com/neurologicablog/nyt-dont-shill-for-fake-psychics/

INTRO: A recent article in the New York Times is, unfortunately, terrible journalism that ends up shilling for a fraudulent and exploitative industry. The author, Sarah Wildman, tells of her previous encounter with a medium through her unnamed cousin. Part of the subject was Wildman’s 14 year-old daughter who had died the year before. This is a massive conflict that compromises her objectivity. No editor should have let this article go through. Wildman herself admits. “Also, I did not really want to debunk it.” She wanted to believe - that makes her a vulnerable target, not an objective journalist. The essence of the article is that it really doesn’t matter if mediums are genuine or not... (MORE - details)
_
 
Last edited:
Article says:
"The essence of the [original] article is that it really doesn’t matter if mediums are genuine or not."

Sure. No problem.

As long as it doesn't matter if the money paid is real or not. Right?
 
Article says:
"The essence of the [original] article is that it really doesn’t matter if mediums are genuine or not."

Sure. No problem.

As long as it doesn't matter if the money paid is real or not. Right?
Reminds me of the payment I made to Homeopathy practitioner after a treatment.

Homeopathy practitioner: "Excuse me this envelope does not have any money in it.

Me: "Yes but there used to be."
 
Back
Top