Nucleus to the universe?

Yes

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

So what keeps nucleus heat from expanding into the cold like EMR? I bet there is no begining to matter and the answer is just that a lot of heat density packed into a small region is at balance with the aether created by the nucleus of the universe it sits in which is just further balance with other nuclei.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Why is trevor allowed to post in the science section? These rambling are not science and a waste of space. His posts don't ever spark any kind of interesting discussion because they usually don't even make any sense let alone contain any science.

 

Hear hear.

 

Have you ever even heard someone speak of the Luminiferous Aether? I don't recognize a single post in this thread from anyone that's even heard of the Aether before let alone be able to discuss it, let alone know about it and discard it for whatever reason.

 

Ha! I can't believe I'm the one considered the crackpot for believing in the same Aether that Tesla and Later Einstein admitted had to be real. Meanwhile all the 'bright minds' are so caught up in enjoying their own whim on particle physics, none of which will ever be proven. The Aether should have never been abandoned and is just as much apart of science as anything. I think it speaks volumes about people and there wimpyness when it comes to withstanding stress and there preferences in life and who they follow.

 

We have all heard of it. 99% of us have rejected it, since its existence has been disproven.

No, Einstein didn't "admit" it was real. In fact he put the final nail in the "stationary aether" coffin.

It's certainly PART of the history of science, the same as Lamarckian evolution, the flat-earth theory and the geocentric theory is. All have been disproven.

 

Of course.

Then you are not paying attention.

I do want to commend you on writing a complete post that actually is constructed with sentences that make sense. Your conclusions are wrong of course but your questions have meaning.

 

Using a femto camera you could record any light experiment and stop theorizing with maths what is going on. Having already posted a quality experiment with the Femto camera I conclude that the Aether is real. You can't use old superstitions in science to disclaim its obvious results on experiments involving light.

 

Tesla went nuts, though not as nuts as you

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

. Einstein, far from thinking the aether real, devoted years of his life to working out the consequences of it NOT existing, viz. the independence of the speed of light from source and receiver.

We are all well aware of the concept of the aether. The background to the Michelson-Morley experiment is standard advanced school-level physics.

It is not wimpy to reject the silly ideas of cranks and nutcases. It is just sensible to avoid wasting one's time.

 

Uh - you realize that cameras cannot see light passing by, right? It can only record light that actually hits the imager.

 

I think what happen is I read some of his posts and my IQ temporarily dropped about 40 points, so I became confused and I thought I was in the science section.

 

The aether is an old superstition on science.

 

Sure thing, no to all of that except the first question which I already answered. Why are you so hung up on it?

 

Well, because you're claiming it here as if it is fact, but it is not fact. You have no evidence to show, and only your say-so that you tried it at all.

The fact that you provide zero corroboration of your experiment (like, say, any kind of numbers) strongly suggests that you are playing fast and loose with your claim that you did it at all.


I haven't known James R as long as I've known my mama but I've known him long enough to know one of the things he gets "hung up on" is utterly unsubstantiated, undocumented, anecdotal claims. Call it a quirk.