Nothing can travel faster than the luminal speed?

ResistETIntervention said:
It belongs here, as I just disproved the Special Relativity Theory.
Click to expand...
Um, not even close.
An unverified - in fact an unsupported - claim, eye witness testimony (see my previous comment about that), is hardly proof.
You vastly overestimate your position.

Reported, suggest moving to Pseudoscience (or Cesspool).
 
ResistETIntervention said:
No, scientists are not stupid. They are, however, limited by the control (funding, job security, ..) that are beyond their capacities or wishes.
Click to expand...
So, all of the millions of scientists and engineers who have worked with Relativity over the past 100 years are part of a vast, global governmental conspiracy to hide a different science? Pardon me, but that sounds rather paranoid, to say the least.
What decided you that I have on training on this subject matter?
Click to expand...
No one who butchers such a common/well understood thought experiment so badly could possibly have passed an introductory course in Relativity.
Do you mean like Einstein, a clerk at a patent office?
Click to expand...
Einstein was not a clerk, he was a technical examiner -- a job he was doing for a paycheck while finishing his physics phd. That's just a popular crackpot myth you're buying into. And again, needless to say, no one who misunderstands the history of Relativity so badly could have possibly passed an introductory course in it.
What I sighted was a brilliant spot of light completely stationary in absolutely clear blue sky, which suddenly moved, leaving a white trail of light tapering off towards a point where it "poof" disappeared within a couple of seconds from its stationary position. It accelerated from zero velocity to a superluminal speed within a second or two.
Click to expand...
Well, Krash is incorrect about what you would see but in either case, it sounds like you saw a daylight meteor. Very cool, but very much below superluminal speed. And since you didn't measure its speed, you are just guessing based on using your eyes and brain incorrectly as a measuring device, you really have no idea how fast it was going. I don't think you grasp just how fast the speed of light is.
It belongs here, as I just disproved the Special Relativity Theory.
Click to expand...
Lol, ignorant arrogance is funny.
 
OnlyMe said:
If you were speaking stricktly to the science you might have a case, but even from within the OP you introduce issues which have nothing to do with the science.., social and/or economic issues which are not about the science.
Click to expand...
The statement regarding my sighting is a counterexample to the theory.
 
ResistETIntervention said:
What is unverified by Einstein is the Special Relativity Theory. It was his thought experiment with an erroneous assumption.
Click to expand...
Wow. You really have no idea what Special Relativity is, do you? It is a whole lot more than a thought experiment -- a lot of our modern technology relies on it being correct.
 
krash661 said:
do tell.
[Previous post:]
you would not see it accelerate. you would see a light dot, then as you blinked, you will not see that light dot anymore.
Click to expand...
There is no reason why you wouldn't see it accelerate. That doesn't even make sense: for most of the acceleration it would be traveling less than C so it isn't different from any other object. Then, above c, you could still see it if it was emitting light. The light would just be very red-shifted. We see galaxies moving away from us at faster than c, for example.
 
if it was a craft, it would at least have warp. to warp, accelerate to 99.9%, with the energies involved,warp occurs within that blink. you would not see it. if it is during the day, blue sky, you especially would not see it. it's that simple.
 
krash661 said:
if it was a craft, it would at least have warp. .to warp, accelerate to 99.9%, with the energies involved,warp occurs within that blink. you would not see it. if it is during the day, blue sky, you especially would not see it. it's that simple.
Click to expand...
Even if we ignore the acceleration, an object moving faster than c is not invisible. Again, we observe galaxies that move faster than c wrt us all the time.

Can you explain, specifically why you think it would be invisible? Describe a specific scenario. Like if it is moving from your left to right, with the sun shining on it from the right. What stops the sun's rays from bouncing off of it and hitting your eyes?
 
Each one of us human beings has the responsibility of becoming aware of the reality that is occurring in our world.

Regarding the Extraterrestrial Intervention, our ignorance is our worst enemy.

If you search, you can find youtube interviews of some of the people on http://www.governmentsecrets.com/ufo-phenomena-people-speaking/#

Here're some of them:

(Astronaut, Colonel Gordon Cooper in 2007)

(Astronaut, Edgar Mitchell interviewed in 2008)
Quote starting from 10:12
“Non-locality is the idea that this information between the two is transported or are instantly recognized regardless of what the other part is in the universe. Well, this kind of challenges Einstein’s concept that nothing moves faster than the speed of light. Here, we have validated that this is absolutely true - that it does. How this happens, the methodology, and the mechanism for it is still very elusive, but the fact that it does happen – that’s not in question any more.”

May we have the courage to face this and see it for what it is...
 
ResistETIntervention said:
Each one of us human beings has the responsibility of becoming aware of the reality that is occurring in our world.
Click to expand...
There's also the responsibility to not invent unfounded crap.

Regarding the Extraterrestrial Intervention, our ignorance is our worst enemy.
Click to expand...
Such as this.

Quote starting from 10:12
“Non-locality is the idea that this information between the two is transported or are instantly recognized regardless of what the other part is in the universe. Well, this kind of challenges Einstein’s concept that nothing moves faster than the speed of light. Here, we have validated that this is absolutely true - that it does. How this happens, the methodology, and the mechanism for it is still very elusive, but the fact that it does happen – that’s not in question any more.”
Click to expand...
That's what happens when you get a gullible fool making pronunciations on a subject he's not qualified to talk about.
"In fact ... Relativity is NOT violated by Non-Local action..." [My emphasis].
 
Russ_Watters said:
There is no reason why you wouldn't see it accelerate. That isn't n't even make sense: for most of the acceleration it would be traveling less than C so it isn't different from any other object. Then, above c, you could still see it if it was emitting light. The light would just be very red-shifted. We see galaxies moving away from us at faster than c, for example.
Click to expand...

I'm not so sure that the galaxies are moving faster than c. Its the expansion of space that causes the red shift, right?
 
Russ_Watters said:
Even if we ignore the acceleration, an object moving faster than c is not invisible. Again, we observe galaxies that move faster than c wrt us all the time.

Can you explain, specifically why you think it would be invisible? Describe a specific scenario. Like if it is moving from your left to right, with the sun shining on it from the right. What stops the sun's rays from bouncing off of it and hitting your eyes?
Click to expand...
i suggest understanding warp, i also suggest understand light speed and warp within earths atmosphere. and the energies involved. i also suggest understanding expansion and relative speed comparison.
it will be easier and more effective if this is achieved.
 
krash661 said:
i suggest understanding warp, i also suggest understand light speed and warp within earths atmosphere. and the energies involved. i also suggest understanding expansion and relative speed comparison.
it will be easier and more effective if this is achieved.
Click to expand...
Explain what you mean! Or explain what exactly is wrong with my explanation. Don't just proclaim it. That's a cop-out.
 
zgmc said:
I'm not so sure that the galaxies are moving faster than c. Its the expansion of space that causes the red shift, right?
Click to expand...
That's correct. But the distance between us and them is growing at faster than c, yet we can still see them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top