Not a theory but an idea.

[Xelasnave.1947]

From a closed thread...I posted this...

I often wonder about neutrinos and think of them travelling without ever "stopping" and so when I hold out my finger as I described above believe that it is reasonable to expect that a little piece of every part of the universe along every trajectory is passing thru the countless points you could find in just the tip...and so it would seem reasonable to assume that such is so for every point in the universe...including those points found in the most less dense regions of space...and as you say their ages could be millions of years and perhaps, indeed almost certainly billions of years old...think background radiation..we think of it relating it firstly to the visable spectrum but what other electromagnetic radiation may have set out at that time...I don't know as I have never considered that aspect until now...but why would things be limited to the small part of the spectrum humans can see...what else set out I wonder...

My idea, not a theory, perhaps not even a hypothisis in the scientific sense....however I spent years in the bush developing rather thinking of reasonable projections of the most basic approach to conveying information, which I think I'd basically a pool ball approach..you bump me I move in a direction determined by the bump.. trying to work out how gravity must work..I reasoned it could not be an information exchange along the lines of bodies saying I am here where are you..if you understand my meaning...I could only conclude a particle would have to go out interact and return with the information about the body it had encountered and as this would contradicte the nothing can go faster than light( if particles had to go out and back gravity would be observed at twice the speed of light..I am not sure the speed of gravity my comment is to have you understand why the simple bump information exchange seemed logical at the time.

And so after years I came up with push gravity only to find the idea had been around since 1745..why didn't someone tell me. Le Sage gravity..put down because it requires particles we can not observe but my thoughts given the realisation with the finger is all this stuff out there may create the pressure I think of with a push gravity approach.
But thinking about it what it boils down to is it should not offend GR although clearly it does, which is odd because it is a co ordinate system ..why should it care...what's the difference..well the pool ball approach, or push gravity, realises there can be no such force of attraction..the need for two way communication suggests to me attraction can not exist and when we see attraction between two bodies it is more likely ( in my reasoning) that they are not attracted but being "pushed" together.

Now where push gravity should help is to explain observations is particularly interesting with galactic rotation curves..their speed according to our sums needs more matter than observed, much more than seems logical and as we don't know what it is not can we find any recall it "dark matter" which is a placeholder until we can work out this invisable matter...dark matter.
However my thought, or idea, and certainly not a theory is that if gravity works in a push type machinery or basically a form of universal pressure then one could reasonably expect the outter stars of a gallaxy to travell faster than our sums tell us they should..reason the outter regions would get more "push" than the inner regions .the inner regions being somewhat shielded by the outter bodies. I wonder would it be possible to build a computer model to see if what I imagine would be expected by analysis of a computer model.

I know the reason why push gravity won't work but these problems may be fixable..remember the big bang was ready for the garbage bin until the major problem threatening it's rejection was presented..let's believe the problems could be worked out and for the purpose a chat let's consider the effect of gravity pushing the outter stars rather than attraction at play.
And I think our central black holes are incapable of causing the stars to follow it by attraction even if huge it's effect drops off rather rapidly ..however if we have external pressure such could control everything..in my view.

What do you think of the idea.
Alex

 

[RainbowSingularity]

reasonably expect the outter stars of a gallaxy to travell faster than our sums tell us they should..reason the outter regions would get more "push" than the inner regions

a physics person would need to explain to me how expansion effects mass and consequential relative gravitational force as a relationship to relative gravitational absolutes on our ability to measure light...
which is a little further past my current ability to currently compute

though i would be very keen to read it when i am in the right frame of mind.

quantum questions in an analog language ...

 

[Xelasnave.1947]

a physics person would need to explain to me how expansion effects mass and consequential relative gravitational force as a relationship to relative gravitational absolutes on our ability to measure light...
which is a little further past my current ability to currently compute

though i would be very keen to read it when i am in the right frame of mind.

quantum questions in an analog language ...

Thanks for contributing.
Alex

 

[Xelasnave.1947]

Stupid thinking about this really.
Alex

 

[RainbowSingularity]

Stupid thinking about this really.
Alex

lol
no such thing

some if not a equal to large proportion (maybe 40%)
of new technology is an adaptation of existing concepts
being able to think and look at the same concepts from a different functional thought process has resulted in vast steps forward in science.

quantum questions in an analog language ...

analog language is models of human thinking processes and how we communicate those ideas
quantum questions is our perception to quantify ideas of possible creation (the wonder aspect of the scientific inquiring mind...)


fyi
my currently stumbling block on push gravity is the idea of force vectors in a box on orbs inside the box and how the gravitational waves effect force vectors in that box form
where is the angular trade off to the uni directional vectors ?(im not pondering on this currently as i have some personal & work stuff that requires more of my mind for a few months)

 

[Oblivionspace]

From a closed thread...I posted this...

I often wonder about neutrinos and think of them travelling without ever "stopping" and so when I hold out my finger as I described above believe that it is reasonable to expect that a little piece of every part of the universe along every trajectory is passing thru the countless points you could find in just the tip...and so it would seem reasonable to assume that such is so for every point in the universe...including those points found in the most less dense regions of space...and as you say their ages could be millions of years and perhaps, indeed almost certainly billions of years old...think background radiation..we think of it relating it firstly to the visable spectrum but what other electromagnetic radiation may have set out at that time...I don't know as I have never considered that aspect until now...but why would things be limited to the small part of the spectrum humans can see...what else set out I wonder...

My idea, not a theory, perhaps not even a hypothisis in the scientific sense....however I spent years in the bush developing rather thinking of reasonable projections of the most basic approach to conveying information, which I think I'd basically a pool ball approach..you bump me I move in a direction determined by the bump.. trying to work out how gravity must work..I reasoned it could not be an information exchange along the lines of bodies saying I am here where are you..if you understand my meaning...I could only conclude a particle would have to go out interact and return with the information about the body it had encountered and as this would contradicte the nothing can go faster than light( if particles had to go out and back gravity would be observed at twice the speed of light..I am not sure the speed of gravity my comment is to have you understand why the simple bump information exchange seemed logical at the time.

And so after years I came up with push gravity only to find the idea had been around since 1745..why didn't someone tell me. Le Sage gravity..put down because it requires particles we can not observe but my thoughts given the realisation with the finger is all this stuff out there may create the pressure I think of with a push gravity approach.
But thinking about it what it boils down to is it should not offend GR although clearly it does, which is odd because it is a co ordinate system ..why should it care...what's the difference..well the pool ball approach, or push gravity, realises there can be no such force of attraction..the need for two way communication suggests to me attraction can not exist and when we see attraction between two bodies it is more likely ( in my reasoning) that they are not attracted but being "pushed" together.

Now where push gravity should help is to explain observations is particularly interesting with galactic rotation curves..their speed according to our sums needs more matter than observed, much more than seems logical and as we don't know what it is not can we find any recall it "dark matter" which is a placeholder until we can work out this invisable matter...dark matter.
However my thought, or idea, and certainly not a theory is that if gravity works in a push type machinery or basically a form of universal pressure then one could reasonably expect the outter stars of a gallaxy to travell faster than our sums tell us they should..reason the outter regions would get more "push" than the inner regions .the inner regions being somewhat shielded by the outter bodies. I wonder would it be possible to build a computer model to see if what I imagine would be expected by analysis of a computer model.

I know the reason why push gravity won't work but these problems may be fixable..remember the big bang was ready for the garbage bin until the major problem threatening it's rejection was presented..let's believe the problems could be worked out and for the purpose a chat let's consider the effect of gravity pushing the outter stars rather than attraction at play.
And I think our central black holes are incapable of causing the stars to follow it by attraction even if huge it's effect drops off rather rapidly ..however if we have external pressure such could control everything..in my view.

What do you think of the idea.
Alex

The neutrino momentum can be contributed to mass energy transition from point to point . All spacial points that are unoccupied by atomic matter have less energy than atomic matter and as a consequence of this , the mass energy is always attracted to ''colder space'' as the laws of transition applies .

 

[James R]

The neutrino momentum can be contributed to mass energy transition from point to point . All spacial points that are unoccupied by atomic matter have less energy than atomic matter and as a consequence of this , the mass energy is always attracted to ''colder space'' as the laws of transition applies .

Questions for you:

1. Please define the term "mass energy transition".
2. Please explain how momentum contributes to "mass energy transition", as defined.
3. Please explain how you are measuring the energy of spatial points unoccupied by atomic matter.
4. Please explain the physical origin of the force of attraction that you refer to. That is, what kind of force it is, and what causes it?
5. Briefly describe/explain the "laws of transition".

Thanks.

 

[James R]

Alex:

I often wonder about neutrinos and think of them travelling without ever "stopping" and so when I hold out my finger as I described above believe that it is reasonable to expect that a little piece of every part of the universe along every trajectory is passing thru the countless points you could find in just the tip..

I don't know what you mean by "a little piece of every part of the universe".

It is true that lots of neutrinos pass through you all the time. A lot of them come from the Sun. But they are just particles, like other kinds of particles. They aren't magical things that travel instantly across the entire universe.

think background radiation..we think of it relating it firstly to the visable spectrum but what other electromagnetic radiation may have set out at that time...I don't know as I have never considered that aspect until now...but why would things be limited to the small part of the spectrum humans can see...what else set out I wonder...

The peak of the cosmic microwave background radiation is not in the visible region; it is in the microwave region - hence the name.

There are lots of different things that hit the Earth from outer space, including photons and lots of other kinds of particles. Our detection is in no way limited to detecting only visible light.

You may well speculate that there are other kinds of particles that are not yet recognised by science. The thing is, we can only ever confirm the existence of a type of particle by detecting it - either directly or by its effects on something else. If we can't see the thing directly and it has no observable effects on anything else, then saying it exists is like saying the invisible undetectable dragon in my garage exists.

trying to work out how gravity must work..

You know we already have one good theory about how gravity works? It's called general relativity.

There are also unconfirmed ideas tied to quantum theory about how we suspect gravity will ultimately be determined to work, in a quantum sense. That idea involves an exchange of virtual gravitons between massive objects. In other words, the gravitational "force" or interaction is assumed to be caused in a similar way to the forces we're more confident about, such as electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force.

And so after years I came up with push gravity only to find the idea had been around since 1745..why didn't someone tell me.

I don't know what you mean by "push gravity", exactly.

Physics doesn't really distinguish between pushes and pulls. Both of those are forces. What's important about forces is that they involve an interaction between two objects. Sometimes that interaction results in an attractive force; sometimes it results in a repulsive force. Whether you want to describe the interaction as a push or a pull doesn't make much difference.

One common problem people have with visualising how forces work in the standard model of particle physics, for instance, is that they can't see how one particle hitting another one could possibly result in an attractive force. Thinking about billiard balls, when one billiard ball hits another it always knocks it away. It doesn't attract. But in the quantum picture, an exchange of virtual particles between two objects can produce an attractive force between them.

However my thought, or idea, and certainly not a theory is that if gravity works in a push type machinery or basically a form of universal pressure then one could reasonably expect the outter stars of a gallaxy to travell faster than our sums tell us they should..reason the outter regions would get more "push" than the inner regions.

So whatever it is that is causing this "pressure" doesn't exist inside galaxies? Why not?

The thing is, it's impossible to dismiss or debunk your idea because at this level of description there's nothing we can test about it. You could be right (who knows?) but you'd need as first step to develop your idea to the extent of making testable predictions that might result in the falsification of your theory.

let's believe the problems could be worked out and for the purpose a chat let's consider the effect of gravity pushing the outter stars rather than attraction at play.

It sounds like you're asking other people to work out the details of your theory for you. I suggest that it is you who needs to put in some hard yards in getting it to a point where it can be tested against actual data.

 

[Michael 345]

I don't know what you mean by "push gravity", exactly.

This is/was my idea of how push gravity would/should/maybe works

Keep it simple just looking at a two body sample Earth - Moon

Currently Moon orbiting Earth configuration applies, Moon moving fast enough not to fall to Earth

Now think of Earth and Moon made with a solid core and thinning closer to the surface. At the surface transition to air and further out, in effect, vacuum

Gravity mirrors this thinning out from the core but as a pushing force, not attractive

As noted the Moon is moving fast enough not to fall to Earth

In the push gravity model the outer limits of Earth / Moon the push effect is almost zero. This leads to the two rolling around each other

If the Moon is nudged closer, the area of contact between push gravity fields neutralise each other

A dead/weak/neutralised spot. In my mind I picture it as a flat spot

As the two become closer the flat spot becomes larger. This is the falling action

At the edge of the expanded spot more neutralising takes place and the two move closer

At some point the smaller body's gravity field becomes totally within the larger body. The mass of each become one mass and the push gravity fields merge increasing the range of the field

Just a thought

 

[James R]

This is/was my idea of how push gravity would/should/maybe works

My question to you is: what is gained through adopting this "push" model of gravity, compared to the current model? Can your "push" idea explain anything that current theory cannot? Does the push theory make any quantitative predictions?

If you're interested in pursuing this, maybe a good place to start would be with the basics. What is the "push" force between two point masses? Is it the same as in our current theories, or different? If different, then what is its mathematical form?

The rubber has to meet the road at some point.

 

[Xelasnave.1947]

I don't know what you mean by "a little piece of every part of the universe".

Consider our most distant (or rather) something within the forty plus dia of the observable universe, say just a star like our Sun. ..it may be that a part or parts of that object arrives before us...a neutrino perhaps, a "packet of light" or wiggly piece of string ...there is presumably something from it to us.
And my suspicion is that every body may be connected by that miniscule unestablished flow of something descret in effect...

They aren't magical things that travel instantly across the entire universe.

Not instantly but obeying the speed limit.
There is a great deal of something that reaches us from M31 for example...how far does the something go be it light at what ver spectrum or even individual electrons or any part that may get a ticket.
CBR is a little part of where is came from.

The peak of the cosmic microwave background radiation is not in the visible region; it is in the microwave region - hence the name.

Yes I understand...it started out in the visable spectrum and is shifted to micro wave now.

You may well speculate that there are other kinds of particles that are not yet recognised by science.

The speculation I try to confine is to considering the effect of what we are reasonably sure is out there...perhaps tweak the knobs with what we have and see if such an environment could produce any effect.

. If we can't see the thing directly and it has no observable effects on anything else, then saying it exists is like saying the invisible undetectable dragon in my garage exists.

Yes I agree. But maybe as I said consider the environment of space as to what is there..a physical approach and perhaps would, well does, clash with thinking of space as something that works without treating gravity as a force...that no problem GR is a model it could be describing the behaviour of this stuff from everywhere environment.
Models can work with a miss on more exact reality...that model of the solar system with Earth at the center has reality wrong but is nevertheless a scientific model..it makes testable predictions...it has the right to still be called a scientific model.

You know we already have one good theory about how gravity works? It's called general relativity.

Yes I know of course.
However what if dark matter is something not accounted for in the equations and it is not there for example would that destroy GR or would it be useful for stuff it does well.

That idea involves an exchange of virtual gravitons between massive objects. In other words, the gravitational "force" or interaction is assumed to be caused in a similar way to the forces we're more confident about, such as electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force.

Yes I suppose I like that approach better...what I think may be a problem is if these ideas require a message out and message back approach.

I don't know what you mean by "push gravity", exactly.

Short version and there are a few still being presented by non mainstream youtubers...but LeSage gravity in effect.

Whether you want to describe the interaction as a push or a pull doesn't make much difference.

Well in my way I think it must be significant if gravity is an external pressure as to how it could behave on rotational curves...the push gravity acts on the outter arms perhaps more producing the rotation curves we don't expect.

But in the quantum picture, an exchange of virtual particles between two objects can produce an attractive force between them.

That is the best at we see it under the model and I both understand and accept such.
Just because an explanation is on the table it won't stop me thinking about it...and when I think about it I see space as so full of stuff from everywhere I can imagine a machinery that certainly won't fit the current model...One can't mention an ether but that I guess is what I see in my imagination...I know GR does not need an ether but I also understand the ether was assumed to construct much science that help lead to GR....And I know the MM experiment. And generally the arguments against the ether so I understand that push gravity would not be popular, I know popularity is not relevant, but I am speaking very casualty and recognise I am not a scientists boot lace...but as I said I like to try and visualise what is taking place.

So whatever it is that is causing this "pressure" doesn't exist inside galaxies? Why not?

Let's limit it to known stuff from everywhere..the speculated force can be a push effect, which should diminish as it encounters and passed thru or by the outter gallaxies so outside gets pushed more...that is as simple as I can suggest it.
It's like stirring some laundry..stir from the center produces different patterns to stirring on the outside. Could the galaxy behave like laundry ...

The thing is, it's impossible to dismiss or debunk your idea because at this level of description there's nothing we can test about it. You could be right (who knows?) but you'd need as first step to develop your idea to the extent of making testable predictions that might result in the falsification of your theory.

The wonderful thing thinking about this and talking about it .I was introduced to Relativity so many people have not even heard about it ..but I think I have some sort of understanding..but as important I learnt what way a theory is presented..and of course what a scientific theory is...few get to understand that strangely.
I have no illusions.

It sounds like you're asking other people to work out the details of your theory for you.

Just trying to share the glory.
There are folk way ahead of me who actually know what they are talking about..it's interesting is all.

I suggest that it is you who needs to put in some hard yards in getting it to a point where it can be tested against actual data.

I have devised an experiment actually involving passing light thru a lens that is spinning at high revs. If there is anything to the pressure idea the focal length should shorten as revs increase...or maybe increase no point in doing it unless I can predict the result.

Thanks James hope you are well.
Alex

 

[Michael 345]

My question to you is: what is gained through adopting this "push" model of gravity, compared to the current model? Can your "push" idea explain anything that current theory cannot? Does the push theory make any quantitative predictions?

As has been said, the force of gravity remains the same and predictions would all be same

It would I think do away with gravitons which do what?

 

[RainbowSingularity]

''colder space''

"colder" = state of energy ?

 

[Oblivionspace]

"colder" = state of energy ?

That is correct .

 

[Oblivionspace]

Questions for you:

1. Please define the term "mass energy transition".

Thermodynamic momentum via retained spectral properties . (Similar to spectral emissions except the retained properties of energy rather than emitted light energy) .

2. Please explain how momentum contributes to "mass energy transition", as defined.

As above , ''hot'' to ''cold''

3. Please explain how you are measuring the energy of spatial points unoccupied by atomic matter.

Where p is density

p/R^n=0

A single spatial point has no mechanism to retain energy , it is ''point passive'' .

4. Please explain the physical origin of the force of attraction that you refer to. That is, what kind of force it is, and what causes it?

The force is gravity ! There is no cause , it is a natural property of space .

5. Briefly describe/explain the "laws of transition".

I'll get back to you on this as the laws need to be written and worded accurately .

 

[Dywyddyr]

I see Theorist is back again...

 

[James R]

Not any more.

 

[Xelasnave.1947]

If there is a pressure style of gravity, push gravity LeSage gravity etc it would suggest the voyagers should slow down in time I do not know by how much unfortunately. I wonder how long we will keep in touch.
All I can see when I imagine it is a pressure of space even outside galaxies and gallaxy groups such that it holds a gallaxy in place like a small bubble in the ocean..the bubble is controlled from outside and one could think something similar at a galactic level. And such an approach would fit with expansion at a varying or increasing rate of expansion.
The idea isn't that wild is it when you consider how dark energy is viewed.
Alex

 

[Ethernos D Grace]

From a closed thread...I posted this...

I often wonder about neutrinos and think of them travelling without ever "stopping" and so when I hold out my finger as I described above believe that it is reasonable to expect that a little piece of every part of the universe along every trajectory is passing thru the countless points you could find in just the tip...and so it would seem reasonable to assume that such is so for every point in the universe...including those points found in the most less dense regions of space...and as you say their ages could be millions of years and perhaps, indeed almost certainly billions of years old...think background radiation..we think of it relating it firstly to the visable spectrum but what other electromagnetic radiation may have set out at that time...I don't know as I have never considered that aspect until now...but why would things be limited to the small part of the spectrum humans can see...what else set out I wonder...

My idea, not a theory, perhaps not even a hypothisis in the scientific sense....however I spent years in the bush developing rather thinking of reasonable projections of the most basic approach to conveying information, which I think I'd basically a pool ball approach..you bump me I move in a direction determined by the bump.. trying to work out how gravity must work..I reasoned it could not be an information exchange along the lines of bodies saying I am here where are you..if you understand my meaning...I could only conclude a particle would have to go out interact and return with the information about the body it had encountered and as this would contradicte the nothing can go faster than light( if particles had to go out and back gravity would be observed at twice the speed of light..I am not sure the speed of gravity my comment is to have you understand why the simple bump information exchange seemed logical at the time.

And so after years I came up with push gravity only to find the idea had been around since 1745..why didn't someone tell me. Le Sage gravity..put down because it requires particles we can not observe but my thoughts given the realisation with the finger is all this stuff out there may create the pressure I think of with a push gravity approach.
But thinking about it what it boils down to is it should not offend GR although clearly it does, which is odd because it is a co ordinate system ..why should it care...what's the difference..well the pool ball approach, or push gravity, realises there can be no such force of attraction..the need for two way communication suggests to me attraction can not exist and when we see attraction between two bodies it is more likely ( in my reasoning) that they are not attracted but being "pushed" together.

Now where push gravity should help is to explain observations is particularly interesting with galactic rotation curves..their speed according to our sums needs more matter than observed, much more than seems logical and as we don't know what it is not can we find any recall it "dark matter" which is a placeholder until we can work out this invisable matter...dark matter.
However my thought, or idea, and certainly not a theory is that if gravity works in a push type machinery or basically a form of universal pressure then one could reasonably expect the outter stars of a gallaxy to travell faster than our sums tell us they should..reason the outter regions would get more "push" than the inner regions .the inner regions being somewhat shielded by the outter bodies. I wonder would it be possible to build a computer model to see if what I imagine would be expected by analysis of a computer model.

I know the reason why push gravity won't work but these problems may be fixable..remember the big bang was ready for the garbage bin until the major problem threatening it's rejection was presented..let's believe the problems could be worked out and for the purpose a chat let's consider the effect of gravity pushing the outter stars rather than attraction at play.
And I think our central black holes are incapable of causing the stars to follow it by attraction even if huge it's effect drops off rather rapidly ..however if we have external pressure such could control everything..in my view.

What do you think of the idea.
Alex

I also have an idea or its more of a belief on how universe work and same as ur thought pattern. If something doesn't work out or there is a plot hole i try to find it. I don't know if its the same but i see universe as wave and particle. There is this sea of particle or wave surrounding us and inside us. Smaller than quark and every know particle. Then there is bigger wave particles . the samaller particle are affected by bigger wave and form a sphere Which is actually a vibration. Then that particle itself has a vibration which reacts with surrounding wave and form another particle. The vibration on smallest particle sea there is no loss of energy. When we observe loss in energy it returns to that sea and form a new particle.so what i am saying is string theory and quantum world is a world where there is vibration inside vibration and so on. But i don't know how small the smallest vibration or particle is. The einstein's maximum speed of light and quantum entanglement seem different but it is not. The light also need medium to travel and when that medium itself is conneting the two particle, information travels faster than light.eg take take a guitar string which is separated by a stick between two. Each string is of equal length. When u vibrate the two string at the same time with equal strength so that it produces same same wavelength. Before the sound reach each other the wave inside the string will reach each other.
Note: vibration can have wavelength, frequency and geometry in quantum world. Which will determine how it interact with each. Eg, The matter and anti matter will have same wavelength of opposing nature.When we observe entangled particle it may cease to be because the bridge between two particle collapses.

 

[Dennis Tate]

From a closed thread...I posted this...

I often wonder about neutrinos and think of them travelling without ever "stopping" and so when I hold out my finger as I described above believe that it is reasonable to expect that a little piece of every part of the universe along every trajectory is passing thru the countless points you could find in just the tip...and so it would seem reasonable to assume that such is so for every point in the universe...including those points found in the most less dense regions of space...and as you say their ages could be millions of years and perhaps, indeed almost certainly billions of years old...think background radiation..we think of it relating it firstly to the visable spectrum but what other electromagnetic radiation may have set out at that time...I don't know as I have never considered that aspect until now...but why would things be limited to the small part of the spectrum humans can see...what else set out I wonder...

My idea, not a theory, perhaps not even a hypothisis in the scientific sense....however I spent years in the bush developing rather thinking of reasonable projections of the most basic approach to conveying information, which I think I'd basically a pool ball approach..you bump me I move in a direction determined by the bump.. trying to work out how gravity must work..I reasoned it could not be an information exchange along the lines of bodies saying I am here where are you..if you understand my meaning...I could only conclude a particle would have to go out interact and return with the information about the body it had encountered and as this would contradicte the nothing can go faster than light( if particles had to go out and back gravity would be observed at twice the speed of light..I am not sure the speed of gravity my comment is to have you understand why the simple bump information exchange seemed logical at the time.

And so after years I came up with push gravity only to find the idea had been around since 1745..why didn't someone tell me. Le Sage gravity..put down because it requires particles we can not observe but my thoughts given the realisation with the finger is all this stuff out there may create the pressure I think of with a push gravity approach.
But thinking about it what it boils down to is it should not offend GR although clearly it does, which is odd because it is a co ordinate system ..why should it care...what's the difference..well the pool ball approach, or push gravity, realises there can be no such force of attraction..the need for two way communication suggests to me attraction can not exist and when we see attraction between two bodies it is more likely ( in my reasoning) that they are not attracted but being "pushed" together.

Now where push gravity should help is to explain observations is particularly interesting with galactic rotation curves..their speed according to our sums needs more matter than observed, much more than seems logical and as we don't know what it is not can we find any recall it "dark matter" which is a placeholder until we can work out this invisable matter...dark matter.
However my thought, or idea, and certainly not a theory is that if gravity works in a push type machinery or basically a form of universal pressure then one could reasonably expect the outter stars of a gallaxy to travell faster than our sums tell us they should..reason the outter regions would get more "push" than the inner regions .the inner regions being somewhat shielded by the outter bodies. I wonder would it be possible to build a computer model to see if what I imagine would be expected by analysis of a computer model.

I know the reason why push gravity won't work but these problems may be fixable..remember the big bang was ready for the garbage bin until the major problem threatening it's rejection was presented..let's believe the problems could be worked out and for the purpose a chat let's consider the effect of gravity pushing the outter stars rather than attraction at play.
And I think our central black holes are incapable of causing the stars to follow it by attraction even if huge it's effect drops off rather rapidly ..however if we have external pressure such could control everything..in my view.

What do you think of the idea.
Alex

Would you like to be put in contact with the writings of an online friend who claims to be working on an all new Multiverse Theory but... he wrote that neutrinos were causing him and his buddies serious problems.

If you do a search for the following title you will find him... he goes by the name "AboveAlpha."
What he wrote impressed me.... but mostly for philosophical reasons in my own case.

"The Philosophical implications of Multiverse Theory?"