New moderators for Free Thoughts and Art & Culture

Status
Not open for further replies.
Qualifications?
Oh, well...if we must... I attended Julliard
Hmm, who'd want to vote for an ex-member of Fame. That is sooo twee.

graduate of the Harvard School of Economics
You have a qualification in fiscal misconduct.

I travel extensively
A shiftless drifter who can't settle down.

I lived through the economic meltdown in 2008
Assuming we have no posters under the age of 1 year then that would be true of all of us.

Not to mention that I've seen Battleship Potemkin about 113 times
And a limited repertoire.
Comfortable with the familiar, doesn't like to expand personal horizons.

Although, in all seriousness: hey. I'm in academia. I have something like 15 papers on the go. Three major projects, all in different areas of genetics. I worked for one of the best biologists of the nation I was in (no peeking!), and also for kind of an ass. I've reviewed for something like 20 frigging journals at different points.
Yeah blah blah, I'm important I can write stuff that's accepted by guys who think a new pen the top pocket of their white lab coat is a fashion statement.

I write fiction and work constantly
Doesn't know how to relax.

I edit articles all the time
And prone to *cough* "terminological inexactitudes".
If you're editing all the time how do you manage to write or watch Battleship Potemkin?

Who among my esteemed competitors has raised a fictitious nation?
Me for one, and at least three of them at last count.

Who of us has turned the Encyclopedia into a roiling whore-house of pulchritudinous chaos?
The majority of those who contributed?

Sciforummers would you let this man sell you a car?

A vote for me is vote against GeoffP.
 
I'm not sure. Who did you mean? :D

Sicko.

I ask the public record: is this what you want for a mod? A confused Dutchman with bondage issues? My political opponent is clearly some sort of pervert.

Well, then I'll just have to try to be the laidest back of all :p

Bah! Sophistry, Sir!

The Right Honourable
GeoffP
 
Sicko.

I ask the public record: is this what you want for a mod? A confused Dutchman with bondage issues? My political opponent is clearly some sort of pervert.



Bah! Sophistry, Sir!

The Right Honourable
GeoffP
Hey I'm Dutch remember. I can't help it, it's my environment!
 
So the mudslinging begins in earnest, eh? Have at you sir!

Hmm, who'd want to vote for an ex-member of Fame. That is sooo twee.

Clearly, my opponent is against the Arts. Philistine!

You have a qualification in fiscal misconduct.

Clearly, my opponent is opposed to Creative Finance.

A shiftless drifter who can't settle down.

A man of experienced worldview and several scandals.

Assuming we have no posters under the age of 1 year then that would be true of all of us.

I hardly think the history of the forum suggests we have any posters over the age of one year, Sir!

And a limited repertoire.
Comfortable with the familiar, doesn't like to expand personal horizons.

Not So, Sir!

I have also watched Predator. Engrossing film.

Yeah blah blah, I'm important I can write stuff that's accepted by guys who think a new pen the top pocket of their white lab coat is a fashion statement.

But of course! How else are we to mark our progress as a society? My profession, Sir, has given us DDT and prosthetic testicles! What has yours done for society?

And prone to *cough* "terminological inexactitudes".
If you're editing all the time how do you manage to write or watch Battleship Potemkin?

Quibblings, Sir! I minimize the screen.

Me for one, and at least three of them at last count.

Unadulterated Balderdash! I have never Heard, Sir, of your Imaginary countries. I suspect you made them up. Shocking!

The majority of those who contributed?

Disgraceful, Sir! You know full well that it was my groundbreaking work in the area of Falsified Information and Incorrect Observances that made the Encyclopedia everything it is today.

Sciforummers would you let this man sell you a car?

A vote for me is vote against GeoffP.

Reason enough, if you ask me, for your impeachment and exile. Australia, I believe, is seeking dung transporters. Harrumph!

Right Honourable, Etc.

GeoffP
 
Hmm you guys know there won't be any voting right? You don't have to campaign :D

Good lord, man. Voting doesn't have anything to do with democracy.

Start carping about the legal equality of every man and you'll be handing the future of the world to the likes of Baron Max and gustav.
 
Good lord, man. Voting doesn't have anything to do with democracy.

Start carping about the legal equality of every man and you'll be handing the future of the world to the likes of Baron Max and gustav.

Democracy? Who said anything about that? There is no democracy here, that's why there isn't any voting!
 
Oh God.. how I hate politics.
They either pick me or they don't. If they don't, big deal. If they do, wooptidoo.
:cool:
 
So the mudslinging begins in earnest, eh?
This appears to be a political statement.
Since when is fact "mudslinging"?

Clearly, my opponent is against the Arts. Philistine!
Clearly "my opponent" has limited discrimination. I was under the impression that anyone with a mental age greater than five years would regard Fame as anything but "art".

Clearly, my opponent is opposed to Creative Finance.
Creative? More "art"?

A man of experienced worldview and several scandals.
Hmm "experienced worldview" yet you keep returning to Battleship Potemkin...

I hardly think the history of the forum suggests we have any posters over the age of one year, Sir!
Mental age != physical age.

Not So, Sir!
I have also watched Predator. Engrossing film.
So your comment that you "edit all the time" was in fact not true.

But of course! How else are we to mark our progress as a society? My profession, Sir, has given us DDT and prosthetic testicles! What has yours done for society?
Industrial waste.
Collapsing bridges.
Air crashes.
The tank.
Oh, and some namby-pamby medical equipment and shit like that.

Quibblings, Sir! I minimize the screen.
So you "goof off" when you're supposed to be working?
Lack of focus? Hmmm.

Unadulterated Balderdash! I have never Heard, Sir, of your Imaginary countries. I suspect you made them up. Shocking!
And so delusional that you're under the impression that if you haven't heard of something it doesn't exist.

Disgraceful, Sir! You know full well that it was my groundbreaking work in the area of Falsified Information and Incorrect Observances that made the Encyclopedia everything it is today.
And more delusion. You think YOU broke the ground on disinformation?

Reason enough, if you ask me, for your impeachment and exile. Australia, I believe, is seeking dung transporters. Harrumph!
Australia wouldn't have me.

Enmos said:
Hmm you guys know there won't be any voting right? You don't have to campaign
If we limited ourselves only to what had to be done we'd never get anywhere. :rolleyes:

GeoffP said:
Precisely so, Sir! You have never been more correct.
Which is to say you have never been correct.
And that is bad because...?
(From a Sciforums perspective.)
 
bunny11.jpg
 
o_O Woah..wtf...

Tags:

art & culture, free thoughts, moderator, nomination, vote, vote for geoff!

Geoff you're becoming scary..>_>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top