My Site Overview

Status
Not open for further replies.
And 3/ general courtesy

So...you're saying that I should be nice and let you post bad science in the physics section?

What makes you think i care?

Because since you started here, there are probably fifteen threads exactly like this one where you make a bunch of accusations and then threaten to leave.

But then you always show up again, and all of this just amounts to wasted bandwidth.
 
''I would be happy to dig up instances, but before I do... do you understand what a lie is and do you really think you have not lied quite a few times''

Please do... I will wipe the floor with you.

''Speculation and theories are not misrepresentations of science. Calling a speculation truth and inventing a theory based on incorrect / absent assertions is a misrepresentation of science.''

That didn't even make sense to my proposal...

''Ben is taking the time to critically review your assertions. Your oppression complex comes because the majority of your assertions are not science and you don't like that Ben can recognize that.''

Consiereing he wiped out 8 theads in one week, and only touched two others... No... it's personal, so don't bother trying to patronize me. I am a very tolerent man, but you are really testin my patience.

''If you really didn't care then this thread and the multitude of similar ones would not exist.''

Do yourself a favor, and rub two brain cells together. You said:

''''If you don't want to change your image then your present path will lead to a separation between you and this site.''

Suggesting that i will inexoraby get myself banned from this site. So i said:

''What makes you think i care? ''

So it has nothing to do with what you said and thought.

I thik that's enough for tonight with you.
 
Crunchy Cat said:
It's not about changing who you are... its about changing your image (i.e. how you are seen / judged by others).
Lol. So—we're suppose to change our images now, to conform with your specifications, to appease your sensibilities, to indulge your regard? Isn't that being a bit demanding?
 
I'll tell you what. Set up a poll:

1. Does Reiku present science

2. I wouldn't know?

3, Absolutely not.

??? Mmmmm - on you go.
 
wOOt?!

The sites become boring and I am not really interested in hearing more about the people who post, they yack about their lives but I am already knowing them abit from prior posts. I think even that the thread Do Photons Have Mass may already have been done by me earlier, no doubt someone did it even before any of us :S I seen alot of repeat threads where they basically go yapping about weather or stuff in the end.
So what are you doing here ?
 
Lol. So—we're suppose to change our images now, to conform with your specifications, to appease your sensibilities, to indulge your regard? Isn't that being a bit demanding?

To answer your question, no. When I used the word 'your' it referred to Reiku (not you). When I used the word 'others' it referred to other members -plural- (not me singular).
 
''I would be happy to dig up instances, but before I do... do you understand what a lie is and do you really think you have not lied quite a few times''

Please do... I will wipe the floor with you.

Ok and good luck with that. I'll also provide a definition of the word 'lie' as your lack of response to the question might be suggestive you really don't understand what a lie is.


To misreperesent science is the only way science develops: ia new idea', wild speculations and general theories.

Speculation and theories are not misrepresentations of science. Calling a speculation truth and inventing a theory based on incorrect / absent assertions is a misrepresentation of science.

That didn't even make sense to my proposal...

Maybe not in Bizarro land but on Earth it makes sense in the English language.

''Ben is taking the time to critically review your assertions. Your oppression complex comes because the majority of your assertions are not science and you don't like that Ben can recognize that.''

Consiereing he wiped out 8 theads in one week, and only touched two others... No... it's personal, so don't bother trying to patronize me. I am a very tolerent man, but you are really testin my patience.

It sounds like Ben validated two of your threads as real science. Maybe you should compare those two to the other eight and try to understand the differences.

''If you really didn't care then this thread and the multitude of similar ones would not exist.''

Do yourself a favor, and rub two brain cells together. You said:

An ad-hom start...

''''If you don't want to change your image then your present path will lead to a separation between you and this site.''

Suggesting that i will inexoraby get myself banned from this site.

Followed by an incorrect interpretation (separation is just often self-chosen... like the times you claimed to leave).

So i said:

''What makes you think i care? ''

Hallelujah, you really did say that.

So it has nothing to do with what you said and thought.

I thik that's enough for tonight with you.

Only in Bizarro land again.
 
And to follow up with the committment made in my last post:

Definition of 'lie' said:
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1) - Cite This Source - Share This
lie1 /laɪ/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[lahy] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation noun, verb, lied, ly·ing.
–noun 1. a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood.
2. something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture: His flashy car was a lie that deceived no one.
3. an inaccurate or false statement.
4. the charge or accusation of lying: He flung the lie back at his accusers.
–verb (used without object) 5. to speak falsely or utter untruth knowingly, as with intent to deceive.
6. to express what is false; convey a false impression.
–verb (used with object) 7. to bring about or affect by lying (often used reflexively): to lie oneself out of a difficulty; accustomed to lying his way out of difficulties.
—Idioms8. give the lie to, a. to accuse of lying; contradict.
b. to prove or imply the falsity of; belie: His poor work gives the lie to his claims of experience.

9. lie in one's throat or teeth, to lie grossly or maliciously: If she told you exactly the opposite of what she told me, she must be lying in her teeth. Also, lie through one's teeth.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Origin: bef. 900; (n.) ME; OE lyge; c. G Lüge, ON lygi; akin to Goth liugn; (v.) ME lien, OE léogan (intransit.); c. G lügen, ON ljūga, Goth liugan]


—Synonyms 1. prevarication, falsification. See falsehood. 5. prevaricate, fib.
—Antonyms 1. truth.
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.


Followed by examples (a very tiny subset) of you (Reiku) lying.

Reiku said:
*Energy is temperature. This is well known

*Potential energy is in fact embedded into the Vacuum, which itself has an temperature...

*Energy has a temperature

*...gravity is curvature, is mass, and therefore, energy.

*Then in that case - Goodbye... and good riddance.

*If antimatter was created in equal proportion, then there could have been a very early antimatter-matter collision

*Light cones describe every possible future of a physical object in spacetime, given a current measurement during the present time.
 
Lol. So—we're suppose to change our images now, to conform with your specifications, to appease your sensibilities, to indulge your regard? Isn't that being a bit demanding?

If one wants to be part of a group -that is, get membership status, recognition and appreciation from other members-, then one actually has to be part of a group -that is, one actually has to get membership status, be such that other members recognize and appreciate one-.
That's how social groups work.

Wanting to belong to a group, but also wanting the group to conform to oneself - this is precarious. Anyone wanting the group to conform to oneself should be ready for unfavorable treatment or expulsion.
 
Christ on a stick. I thought the guy said his goodbye's already.

We gotta come up with a new policy: if anyone creates a goodbye thread, they get 24 hrs to post in that thread alone and then they're banned for 6 months.
 
Crunchy Cat:
Crunchy Cat said:
When I used the word 'your' it referred to Reiku (not you).
Yet, when you refer to Reiku, you also refer to the whole of Sciforums, and to Sciforums' science community, and to Sciforums' science, and to the global science community, and to the faculty of science, and to the history of science, and to the honor and integrity placed upon science by yours truly. Look, I'm not so much defending Reiku on this issue, but it seems you're vying for science as a demoiselle in distress. What? is she so petite? not pretty enough to flaunt the latest fashions? Or is it that she's too delicate to be seen outside her ivory tower escorted by an eccentric gentleman friend from the wrong side of the tracks?
 
Last edited:
Christ on a stick. I thought the guy said his goodbye's already.

We gotta come up with a new policy: if anyone creates a goodbye thread, they get 24 hrs to post in that thread alone and then they're banned for 6 months.

I like it.
 
Crunchy Cat:Yet, when you refer to Reiku, you also refer to the whole of Sciforums, and to Sciforums' science community, and to Sciforums' science, and to the global science community, and to the faculty of science, and to the history of science, and to the honor and integrity placed upon science by yours truly. Look, I'm not so much defending Reiku on this issue, but it seems you're vying for science as a demoiselle in distress. What? is she so petite? not pretty enough to flout the latest fashions? Or is it that she's too delicate to be seen outside her ivory tower escorted by an eccentric gentleman friend from the wrong side of the tracks?

Ripley -

You want flair and chutzpah to be accepted in science?
And that those participating in science would hold themselves to the standard of being fluent on all levels of the Bloom Hierarchy?
And that they would strive for integrity and maintain it?


Wonderful. :)
 
We gotta come up with a new policy: if anyone creates a goodbye thread, they get 24 hrs to post in that thread alone and then they're banned for 6 months.

I've... I've never read anything so beautiful! :worship:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top