Here's lets make this simple:
This is an incident that did not happen, however, I roundly condemn it since the validity of the story does not matter.
It must refer to the noun preceding it. Which in this case is
incident. The incident in question is the command to murder the singing girl. Ergo, you are condemning the actions of Mohammad in the story. Which is to say you think that in this story his actions are immoral. So, no, I didn't misquote you SAMual. You were probably trying to have
It refer to the
story, but, alas that's not what you wrote.
now all you have to do is hope Allah doesn't send you to hell for thinking Mohammad's actions (and hence his puppet master - Allah's actions) were immoral. You see, it was Allah that told Mohammad what to do - isn't that right?
Let's hope, for the sake of the singing-slave girl,
and your soul, your hunch is correct and the story is just more Islamic myth making. Like the Islamic Golden Age
What I find sad is that you had to backtrack and check to make sure you were satisfied that the story is more Islamic myth then history. Think about the implications that has on society and you'll soon come to realize the root cause of much of the problems in the ME has little to do with "Western" people or "America".
It'll also dawn on you just why this molester tried to hide behind being a conservative Muslim. THAT'S really sad isn't it? Think about that for a minute.
Michael
PS: At least we agree the "
incident" was worthy of "
condemnation". Which is to say, if said incident is historically valid, said protagonist's God has been pronounced
guilty of immorality.
So hey, we agree again!
I'm looking forward to working with you in the future!
