Muslim cultural center near 9/11 site causes distress

In 10 seconds on gut feeling I'd go somewhat like this:

Shinto Shrine
Buddhist Temple
Hindu Temple
Scientology Temple
Church
Mosque
Synagogue

Where I live there is a mosque down the block on one side, a Jain temple on the other side, a Buddhist temple behind, and a gurdwara in the lane behind. There is also a church one and a half block down the road. We barely notice the adhan, the prayer meetings in the Gurdwara or the puja in the temples. Sometimes we hear the church bells on a clear and quiet morning. I don't have any opinions one way or the other. People going to pray regardless of mode or destination, are all one and the same.
 
Don't be daft Bells there are mosques all over NY, so if you want to show that new yorkers don't want mosques you are going to have to show that they are against all mosques not one in Ground Zero that is to open on 9/11 to 'commemorate' the event.

I'm sorry, I don't think I'm the one being daft about this.

Look at the bigotted and racist vitriol coming out over this.. And you call me daft for pointing out that the reaction to this is based on racism and bigotry? How many mosques have been built in NYC since 9/11?

And it isn't "in Ground Zero" but a few blocks away.

You can call me daft all you want Lucy. It still doesn't take away the very simple fact that the the reaction to this is racist and bigotted.

Like I said would you have thought it okay to build a museum in her majesties name highlighting the british monarchy in the Bogside area of Derry? Answer the question. Should the Irish catholics in that area have been miffed over something as 'benign' as the symbolic value of the area. What if they built it right next to the Bloody Sunday Memorial? If you can see why that would be an eyebrow raiser then maybe you can see why the location of this mosque is provoking for some people.
Again, do you think the feelings that were prevalent in Ireland between the Catholics and the Protestants is something that should be encouraged in the US, against Islam? Because that's exactly what is happening and your use of that example is a perfect representation of that. The anger over this mosque is based on hatred and bigotry. That you don't see that is really quite astounding.

Do I think they should be "miffed"? No. You'll excuse me for not supporting hateful racist and bigotted political agendas that breed fear into communities.
 
May I remind you that Muslims are not a race so reaction against the Mosque is not racist. The planners are being deliberately inflamatory and disrespectful to all those who lost their lives. How would like BP to open up a string of BP Gas stations around the Gulf of Mexico. I guess you would find no problem with that.
 
A little out of hand?

This argument is starting to go off the rails a little. Let's bring it home, people.

And why do they find it inappropriate? Because the terrorists were Muslims. And yet, no one batted an eyelid when the Catholic Church erected a statue of Jesus weeping right near the site of the Oklahoma bombing.

This is getting out of hand: first off, that's a memorial, just down the street from a church destroyed in the Oklahoma bombing. It's just not the same comparison, unless the "facepalm Jesus" is going to be delivering sermons on how to become a Roman Catholic or handing out hate literature. (And yes, I don't know that the mosque is actually going to do that, but based on the funding and the builders it's a fair guess.)

What kind of message does this send to the Muslims who live in New York?

There's a lot of questions there: i) which Muslims? Suleyman Schwartz and Zuhdi Jasser, who represent] [URL="http://www.islamicpluralism.org/"]democratic] Islamic organizations in the US, object to the mosque using that darned "insensitive" word. Presumably Bells means a bad message is being sent. But to who, then? To [url="www.cair.com"]these guys? Well...good. That's great. And I've no doubt they're really, really pissed off about it.

Personally I think the whole site should be made into a park with trees planted to mark the number of people who died on the site. But that's just me.

This would be a much more acceptable usage.

The objection to this is based solely on the fact that it will be a mosque.. an area assigned to mostly Muslims or anyone who wishes to visit the centre.. If it was a church of any other denomination, there would be no problems at all. And that is the telling factor.

Well, of course. It wasn't church goers, but mosque goers, that were responsible for the attack. That doesn't mean all Muslims are responsible for it, but it is - as the argument has been - hugely insensitive. Would it be fair to put a German cultural centre at the gates to Dachau or Auschwitz? Of course not.

9/11 was a result of US policies of more than 60 years duration. Maybe its time there was a Muslim cultural center which explored US policies in the Muslim world.

Well, there are those in abundance. To continue your line of thought, it might be a good place for a cultural centre exploring the results of Islamic politics on humanity, both domestically and internationally.

It still seems like you want to condemn all Islam for one particular interpretation of it. Some interpretations of Christianity are violent, but it doesn't follow that all versions of it should be suppressed. It certainly doesn't follow that there should be no Christian churches in the Middle East because it's insulting to the victims of the Crusades.

No; but right on the spot of a contemporary massacre? That's a bit much. If we were to take the ME-church comparison you use, there wouldn't be a church or a mosque for a thousand miles around the ME in any direction. That might not be a bad thing, as a reminder of the foibles of organized religion in that region, although that's another issue. The victims of the Christian Crusades and Islamic Jihads are a bit less fresh, and the edifices a bit older, so it's not as profitable to pass judgement on those.

What you may not understand is that there are lots of Muslims in New York, living and even worshiping peaceably, and we are very much used to them. They may freak you out, I suppose, but I don't think they don't freak out most New Yorkers, or most people for that matter. I don't see any solid evidence that this is really a radical Islamic plot to gloat over Ground Zero, I do see rhetoric that suggests a lot of closet bigots are showing their true colors (not necessarily you, but you are on their side--on the side of discriminating against people based on their religion).

Well, I actually understand the issue a little better than you suspect. Some people in that protest - like people in any protest - might be closet bigots. But there's also a tradition of the purse-strings of mosques in this country often being controlled by radical interests. The backers of this shindig do have a connection to a number of less-than-savoury memes, as Walid Shoebat outlines here (see also here. He seems like a Pat Robertson-style reactionary, confusing the religious with the political, if you follow me. Maybe not the best person to lead this venture. "Religions do not dialogue". Oh, really? Well, neither do we, Pat. :shrug:

Now, do you think someone from the "Stop Islamization of America" is complaining about the insensitivity of the issue? Or is she attacking the religion itself?

Well, I would ask myself which mosque erection she's complaining about. SIOA has a larger point, when they look at the rights of non-Muslims in some Muslim countries, like [URL="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_countries"/]these ones[/url].

That is what is being said about the "insensitive" choice of building it there. Now tell me it's not about religious bigotry?

Bells, Bells, Bells: a religious racist and bigot is trying to erect a triumphal monument on the site of 9/11, and you're worried about some chanting and opinions? You weren't so sanguine about words during the Mavi Marmara incident. This is about intent; and the intent is pretty clear. This issue doesn't really parallel Protestant/Catholic sentiment, unless Catholics and Protestants were erecting triumphal monuments - and not even monuments, but centres for prosetylization - on a pile of the corpses of each other. (Similarly, the Orangemen parade is a hugely bad idea.) It speaks volumes about the intent of some of the people supporting this insensitive monument.

For everyone: examine the links. (Bells and Sam will dismiss them without reading, I assume, but I think everyone else will get something out of them.) Maybe - like the Orangemen's parade mentioned above - it would be better to allow the injured parties their space, rather than letting an extremist attempt to jam an insultingly concieved idea down everyone's throat; in fact, I suspect that the more controversy created here, the happier he'd be. Let's not give him that.
 
Last edited:
So, you wouldn't say you "like" or "dislike" Islam? Right in the middle on this one?

If you HAD to rank the following faiths from top to bottom on their being built near your home - how would you rank them based on your initial gut feeling?

Church
Buddhist Temple
Shinto Shrine
Synagogue
Mosque
Scientology Temple
Hindu Temple

I'd equally rank all (even Scientology) so long as their leadership was really ecumenical (and not just pretending to be) and moral. But that's the trick, isn't it? The adult choice.
 
Racist and bigoted or Racist or Bigoted?

Look at the bigotted and racist vitriol coming...the reaction to this is based on racism and bigotry...the the reaction to this is racist and bigotted...not supporting hateful racist and bigotted political agendas

Just Curious raises a good point here: what race is Islam, again? Is it also fair to call Islamic extremism 'racist'?
 
Just Curious raises a good point here: what race is Islam, again? Is it also fair to call Islamic extremism 'racist'?

Hmm... let's see... Islam is a religion and is practiced by many different peoples of many different ethnic and cultural backgrounds.

(I know that was the point of your post, but considering that people on this forum need things spelled out for them I thought I'd ante up some help.)

Another thing I'm surprised about is that nobody seems to have quoted, or even acknowledged one of my earlier posts... let's bring that back to the spotlight for just a quick second.

Just realized something too... aren't they naming the Mosque Cordoba House or something?

Hasn't it occurred to anybody to maybe google that name? If you did, you would realize that Cordoba is the name of the first Western City conquered by Muslims.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Córdoba,_Spain#History

Talk about a slap in the face.

Spoilers (for those who don't get it): They're trying to suggest that Ground Zero is a conquest of Islam. The fact that nobody decided to even acknowledge it suggests to me that it was ignored because nobody could think of anything good to rebuke the statement with. Better to cop-out and ignore it and let the statement fade from memory rather than show how much of a hypocrite you are.
 
Last edited:
Lets have a look at Ms Gellar in action about this mosque, shall we?

We've heard arguments about how this is about being sensitive to the victims. How sensitive are we being to all the victims? How sensitive is she being to all the victims and to all Muslims when she makes such comments about this particular mosque:

The Jihadi terrorist attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on 9/11, the attack on the USS Cole, the destruction of the Marine Barracks in Beirut, the bombing of the American Embassy in Kenya, the beheading of Wall Street Journalist Daniel Pearl in Pakistan, the killing of schoolchildren in Israel, and the bombing in London, Mumbai, Rome, Madrid, Paris, as well as death and destruction caused by Islamic Jihadis in different parts of the world, are the continuation of Islamic brutality stretching back to the time when Mohamed led Muslims in the first Jihad.

The Islamic prime Minister of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdogan clearly and loudly said: “The Mosques are our barracks, the Domes are helmets, the Minarets are Bayonets and the faithful are soldiers.” Erdogan’s vision of Islam is the same as that of Bin Laden, Colonel Khadafy, Mullah Omar, Imam Yavalaki, Al-Zawahiri, Ayatollah Khomeini, and the Saudi King who awarded Erdogan “The King Faisal International prize for service to Islam.”

The purpose of the construction of an Islamic barracks in the heart of America is to train jihadis, perhaps violent as well as non-violent, for the next phase of the Islamic invasion of America. For the Islamic Mosque will train Muslims in the way of Islam. Since the days of Mohamed, the way of Islam is jihad. Mosques will ensure that newly converted Muslims become reliable jihadis, advancing the rule of Islamic law by various means.

The issues at stake will certainly affect the heart of American freedom, democracy, cultural values and tolerance. America is a tolerant country that allows for the free worship of all its citizens. But our tolerance has limits. Do we have to tolerate the intolerant Islamic ideology, and Muslims who preach intolerant Islam and want to annihilate or subjugate all infidels?

Until we question our assumptions about Islam, Muslims trained in Mosques by hate-preaching Mullahs will attack us with a vengeance. Islam is a controlled paradigm, a 7th century Arabian political dogma paraded as a religion. Islam tolerates no dissent, will of the people, freedom, coexistence, pluralism, secularism or religious tolerance.

-----------------------------------------

Islam teaches that Jihad in the name of Allah would ensure every Muslim a secure place in the world and happiness and luxury in the Islamic abode where Allah resides. Islamic mosques and religious centers serve as distribution points for hate literature. American Mosques are not products of our thought system. Mosques are not for preaching spirituality, ethics, civics, and coexistence. Do we have to allow construction of mosques that are breeding grounds for future terrorists? Mosques also serve as a vital links in the communications chain with Islamic terrorist groups around the world. The hate preaching Imams are on a collision course with American democracy, positive values and secularism.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/05/atlas-exclusive-babu-suseelan-.html

It is racist because the majority of Muslims in America are not white anglo saxon. They are of ME or Asian descent. I should not have to point out why it is bigotted. You'd have to be a brain dead numbskull or a bigot yourself to not get that.

Now, if such comments were made about a Synagogue for example? What would the reaction be? It would be correctly described as anti-semitism and rightly and justly shot down instantly. But about a mosque? Well.. 'people died there and the people who killed them were Muslims after all'... And apparently using that kind of dialogue is acceptable when it applies to Muslims, but not anyone else.

Apparently, according to Lucy, the likes of Pamela would have no issues with a Mosque being built anywhere in New York.. Sure seems that way, doesn't it. :rolleyes:
 
Why would you continue to quote Walid Shoebet after he has already been exposed as a liar?

And he's lying here? How do you know? How do I know the allegations against him are even true? Sour grapes always spells truth?

Lets have a look at Ms Gellar in action about this mosque, shall we?

We've heard arguments about how this is about being sensitive to the victims. How sensitive are we being to all the victims? How sensitive is she being to all the victims and to all Muslims when she makes such comments about this particular mosque:

You'll note she's in fact citing the Turkish Prime Minister there. So, given that most Muslims are of a different race, why is Erdogan then such an enormous racist? Surely he can't be some kind of islamophobe, can he?

It is racist because the majority of Muslims in America are not white anglo saxon. They are of ME or Asian descent. I should not have to point out why it is bigotted. You'd have to be a brain dead numbskull or a bigot yourself to not get that.

Interesting. So when people propose pro-Islamic arguments, they, too, are racists? I mean, not to accept that argument would mean you were brain-dead or a racist yourself.

Now, if such comments were made about a Synagogue for example? What would the reaction be?

Wait, I know the answer to this one: it would be characterized as a happy-go-lucky "singalong" and promptly dismissed. Right? :rolleyes:

The man is defending the likes of Gellar. What kind of credibility do you think he has?

I don't know. More than you, a classical example of a racist hypocrite? Or less?
 
GeoffP:

Congratulations. You're a Zionist. There will be no future expectation of integrity, honesty, morality or logic from you.
 
GeoffP:

Congratulations. You're a Zionist. There will be no future expectation of integrity, honesty, morality or logic from you.

Well, as this is the nth such declaration about me from you, you'll forgive me if I take it with some disinterest.
 
GeoffP:

Congratulations. You're a Zionist. There will be no future expectation of integrity, honesty, morality or logic from you.

I'm surprised you had any expectations from him in that regard in the first place to be honest. Again, the man defends the likes of Geller:

Jihadis consider America as a great Satan. For Muslims, Jihad means battle against Satan. Through the Mosque, Muslims want to continue jihad war against infidel America. America is a battleground where jihadis can fight against Satan and his friends. The mission of the Islamic community in America is to spread Islamic sharia law, making all infidels into dhimmis. Muslims consider that it is a Muslim’s duty to wage war against infidels. To die in the battle against infidels is the highest form of witness to Allah. Do we want to allow Muslims to create more suicide bombers and murders on our soil?

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/05/atlas-exclusive-babu-suseelan-.html

He's even parotting her:

"He says he advocates for tolerance, but in his book he advocates for Sharia law which is radically intolerant," said Pamela Gellar, who leads the organization Stop Islamization of America. "We have no idea where the funding is coming from. We know his father built an Islamic Center on 96th street and was funded by 49 Muslim countries. Who's funding this $50 million monster? We want to know."

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/

Sound familiar?

Apparently a religious centre is a "monster". Ah wait, it's because it is an Islamic religious centre..

MG_0129.jpg


From Geller's site.

Give it a few minutes. There will probably come a statement from him about how much he deplores that kind of bigotry as a general rule. And then it will be followed by a "but".. It's like a nightmarish version of deja vu.
 
I guess I overestimated his ability to think. I don't know. Either I was mistaken, he is self delusional or he's hit a very deep abysmal low in his ability to process information.

Apart from spidergoat, he is only other person to disappoint me in this regard
 
Some more from the anti-Islamic kook:

It is an insult to the memory of the glorious dead. How dare they build a shrine to the ideology that inspired the attacks on the power centers of the West -- the WTC, financial center of the world; the Pentagon, military super power of the world; and the White House, power center of the world.

1. Where is the sensitivity to the victims? This is an insult and a kick in the gut. Where is the tolerance, mutual understanding and mutual respect? Opening on September 11, 2011, as they plan to do, shows they hold us in complete contempt.

2. This is part of their historic Islamic pattern: build mosques on the cherished sites of conquered people.

3. Cordoba House group has not been honest -- it's not a mosque, it's a prayer space, it's a mosque.

4. Where's the money coming from? Is it terror-funded, like Feisal's jihad genocidal "flotilla"?

5. They say they're for tolerance, but Rauf is on record calling for Sharia, which is radically intolerant.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/

Hmmm..

I'm seeing a lot of handwringing going on..

You look through that site and dear god.. This woman should not be allowed to roam the streets..:bawl:

You should read what she has to say about Obama. I don't know whether to laugh or to see about having her committed.

And Geoff, I'm breaking the silence.. But this is the woman and the ideology you're defending? And using pretty much the exact same argument she is? I mean WTF?

Let's assess this latest bombshell consistent with Obama's lifelong anti-semitism. The White House is linked to the jihad convoy (flotilla) latest act of war by jihadists and their leftist tools. Obama's great pals and sponsors, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn -- vile anti-semites and domestic terrorists -- are behind the flotilla, as is Ground Zero mega mosque Imam Faisal, and seditionist (codepink) Jodie Evans. All are O-pals and part of the funding and operation of the genocidal "Free Gaza."

These are Obama's friends, all visitors to the White House according to the visitors logs. The enemies of America, enemies of Israel, are all active supporters and abettors of the jihadist movement. This is the White House.

Dude..

Geoff..

WTF?

The rest of it is even worse. She is a hatemonger and a liar. And you're not only defending her but you're using her arguments in this thread.. Again.. WTF?:bugeye:
 
I'm sorry, I don't think I'm the one being daft about this.

Look at the bigotted and racist vitriol coming out over this.. And you call me daft for pointing out that the reaction to this is based on racism and bigotry? How many mosques have been built in NYC since 9/11?

And it isn't "in Ground Zero" but a few blocks away.

You can call me daft all you want Lucy. It still doesn't take away the very simple fact that the the reaction to this is racist and bigotted.


Again, do you think the feelings that were prevalent in Ireland between the Catholics and the Protestants is something that should be encouraged in the US, against Islam? Because that's exactly what is happening and your use of that example is a perfect representation of that. The anger over this mosque is based on hatred and bigotry. That you don't see that is really quite astounding.

Do I think they should be "miffed"? No. You'll excuse me for not supporting hateful racist and bigotted political agendas that breed fear into communities.

No Bells Ground Zero is the entire area affected by the tower collapse not just the tower sites themselves. I'm sure you don't know that for a long time after the fact 'Broadway-Nassau', the name of the subway station near the WTC, was referred to as 'ground zero' by the train conductor for quite a while after the event. Its a few blocks away. Its not just the twin towers that amount to what we call 'ground zero'. The mosque is only two blocks away from the WTC site.

LOL! How many mosques have been built in the entire NYC area since 9/11? Probably the same as the amount of Churches and Synagogues. Don't be ridiculous! Mosques and churches of course are built in communities where there is a need for them. The problem with this project is not that it is a mosque, its the location.

You miss my point, its not about the sentiments between catholics and protestants Bells. Its whether you think it would have been appropriate to build a museum next to the site of what is known as the Bloody Sunday massacre dedicated to history of her majesty and the british monarchy!!! How about a protestant church built next to the memorial? The obvious answer is no Bells because its INSENSITIVE. Only the dull minded wouldn't understand that!!! It wouldn't be that the Irish catholics of Derry have a problem with churches or museums, its that it shouldn't be positioned in a location where its symbolism would be hurtful.

Now the following is to enlighten you about NYC and its mosques. There are enough that someone even decided to write a book about them:

The corner of 96th Street and 3rd Avenue on the Upper East side of Manhattan hosts an architectural and religious icon that has grown from a beacon for Muslim New Yorkers to a symbol of the proud, peaceful and friendly nature of Islam in a city still somewhat wary women in a scarves or mean wearing beards. The Islamic Cultural Center, with it’s smooth dome, delicate minarets and sleek, modern design marries old with new, a fitting emblem of what New York City has become.

But the Center, which often figures largely in any news or photographic piece, is one of many mosques in the city - some street front types hidden between New York delis and discount clothing stores; others beautiful, inspirational edifices that seem to strongly declare: “Come in and worship Allah here.” The mosques of this diverse city rarely receive any attention for their sheer numbers and variety of architectural designs, which add a unique character to the history of New York City scenery.

Now a new book boldly ventures to grasp the transformation of New York mosques from the mere eight or nine spread out among the five boroughs in the early 1990s to the more than 90 here today. New York Masjid: The Mosques of New York City by Jerrilynn D. Dodds and Edward Grazda is a thorough, intelligent photographical and written study of New York’s mosques from an architectural standpoint.

Between the World Trade Center bombings in 1993 and the horrific events of September 11th, 2001, the mosques of New York City have traveled an eight-year path of redemption and growth to proudly stand among the elite of religious architecture. Dodds, a professor of architecture at the City College of New York, neatly dissects the history and growth of the city’s mosques by addressing how they were built, the importance of arches and domes versus a vision where architecture has no meaning in lieu of tradition and faith.

Dodds’ eloquent yet simple text supplements Grazda’s beautiful black-and-white photographs, which gives the book a taste of elegance sharpened by the fascinating subject matter. This is truly a fabulous coffee table books for Muslims, and others, to own.

An introductory paragraph encapsulates why Dodds embarked on the project:

We entered into this study … with the idea of bearing witness to some of the dozens of communities of New Yorkers who practice Islam, through the architecture which serves them as collectives within the city. This creation of shared space, this building up of neighborhoods seemed to answer the destructive and exploitative image the World Trade Center bombing of 1993 spawned.

There are nearly 800,000 Muslims in New York City, Dodds writes, with numerous mosques spread throughout the boroughs: 28 in Queens, 27 in Brooklyn, nearly 20 in Manhattan and in the Bronx and at least 8 in Staten Island. Most mosques are converted stores and buildings. The first newly built mosque - Masjid Alfalah -led to the construction of the “grand, visible” Islamic Culture Center.

Yet many New Yorkers are unaware of the sheer quantity of mosques because many are in basements of buildings or hidden behind demure street signs. But increasingly, various New York neighborhoods with large Muslim populations are latching onto mosque construction as a way of making Islam more visible and improving the neighborhood.

http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/...73&pagename=Zone-English-ArtCulture/ACELayout

Like I said to Michael there are numerous mosques all over the place and New Yorkers don't seem to give a shit about any of them.

The WTC is not the right location for this unless you care nothing for what it represents to New Yorkers. What insensitive dolt would use 9/11 as the date to open a mosque in ground zero and then have the audacity to call it 'the cordoba'? I think you understand the issue and are simply playing games of argument. What's next? Open a US embassy on the site of My Lai in vietnam? How about having a Turkish cultural center in Armenia? How about you place it Gyumri? I'm sure they would be tickled pink!

Yes Bells I call you daft. Dull as well as daft.

I mean you would have to be for you not to understand that the issue is the location and not the building of a mosque. Had it ever occurred to you that insisting on a mosque on that site would breed resentment among many New Yorkers? A resentment that didn't exist before? Like I said 'dull'.

So now that we see that they are building mosques all over NY you can put it in your pipe and smoke it.
 
Last edited:
I'm surprised you had any expectations from him in that regard in the first place to be honest. Again, the man defends the likes of Geller:

He's even parotting her:

Classically, you misunderstand. I don't parrot her. I point out that the mosque planner appears to be an extremist. (One would think that such an important, humanitarian structure could have been founded by an actual Sufi.) But if we're to speak of birds, Sam parrots racists like Nasrullah. Yet, this doesn't offend your admiration of your new friend. :D It's sweet.

Give it a few minutes. There will probably come a statement from him about how much he deplores that kind of bigotry as a general rule. And then it will be followed by a "but".. It's like a nightmarish version of deja vu.

No. Only the extraordinarily foolish would characterize me in that way. I will, however, leave that to you.
 
Hmmm..

I'm seeing a lot of handwringing going on..

You know, it's really dawned on me that you haven't the slightest idea what "handwringing" really means.

Now, as to those points: whether or not you like the woman, Bells, maybe you could address the ideas. Pick any one point you like to start with. Do you think you could manage that?

And Geoff, I'm breaking the silence.. But this is the woman and the ideology you're defending?

You're astoundingly ignorant. I do share some of those questions, but her sharing them with me doesn't make them illegitimate questions, Bells, which I hope you would understand. (I'd also be interested in seeing my explicit statement of support for Geller...compared to your documented passive acknowledgement of genocidal impulses.) But let's have some actual answers from you now, instead of just demonizing the opposition, shall we? Pick one of the points of hers you listed, and let's discuss it. Or you could troll some more; ad hominem, etc etc. Why, you could even insult my wife and family!
 
Yes Bells I call you daft. Dull as well as daft.

I mean you would have to be for you not to understand that the issue is the location and not the building of a mosque. Had it ever occurred to you that insisting on a mosque on that site would breed resentment among many New Yorkers? A resentment that didn't exist before? Like I said 'dull'.

So now that we see that they are building mosques all over NY you can put it in your pipe and smoke it.
Thank you Lucy, for your very adult response.

The reaction to this Mosque has brought out something very ugly in the US. And frankly the reaction points out to why it probably needs to be built. That is what you are not quite getting.

You don't get that your reaction, your pointing out that it is insensitive to have a Mosque built there, is basically saying that the religion is somehow at fault. There were Muslim victims from the 9/11 attacks. Something people seem to forget. People are so obsessed with the religion of the terrorists, while ignoring their personal ideology, that they forget that the Mosque could be a representation of the Muslim victims who died and a way to educate prople about Islam.. Read the reports coming out about the protest movement against this Mosque. Little of it deals with the sensitive nature. Most of it deals with anti-Islamic sentiments.

As the poster boy for abortion points out with his little placard which was posted above.. He learned all about Islam from 9/11. Now, do you think 9/11 is a correct representation of all Muslims in New York or around the world? Because by ranting on and on about the insenstivity of the building site for it, that is what is being represented..
 
Back
Top