That's a real phenomenon.When hit over the head you are supposed to see stars, in the funnies anyway,
That's a real phenomenon.When hit over the head you are supposed to see stars, in the funnies anyway,
There is a new article in NEW SCIENTIST about weirder realities than Quantum Mechanics, but I do not think your idea is in that category.Thus it would be the very Being of the universe, our own minds are CounterSpheres, trapped in pockets of our own local time, the sphere the godwave.
yea, ask the NFL.That's a real phenomenon.
Link please.There is a new article in NEW SCIENTIST about weirder realities than Quantum Mechanics, but I do not think your idea is in that category.
K I'm guessing this is the link. https://www.newscientist.com/articl...ave-hints-of-a-theory-beyond-quantum-physics/feature article June 13 2018
We have hints of a theory beyond quantum physics
If you think our best theory of reality is weird you ain't seen nothing yet, says physicist Ciarán Lee – it could be a fuzzy version of something bigger
sorry this is the headline, can not link.
born 1930, if I told you other statistic you would not believe it, but hey, I have those brain children too. (see 'equal velocity" thread.And by the way are you really 87 because that is what your profile says.
What is this statistic that I would not believe?born 1930, if I told you other statistic you would not believe it, but hey, I have those brain children too. (see 'equal velocity" thread.
Also, can't find the equal velocity thread.
if your just going to copy verbatim quotes from evangelists then your preaching.time is the water in the infinite
if your just going to copy verbatim quotes from evangelists then your preaching.
We are approaching another Holiday to some, the summer northern solstice.Time (a favourite topic of mine) is a great CONCEPT. However, by virtue of being a concept, it is NOT real. It has NO physicality. So it is a big big big mistake to compare it with something, water, which is real and does have physicality
True, if you talk about the universe, us. Our past does not exist any more, the future not yet. But in the model proposed here, the pond, through which we travel as a wave, exists, no matter what radius the wave has at any given moment.2/ The past does not exist
3/ The future does not exist
We are approaching another Holiday to some, the summer northern solstice.
So here is to look at this experimental model again, where time is taken to be the first dimension existing before the start of the universe, modelled in this case as the water of a pond. Dirac used a similar concept.
Why cant we have an experimental model like that, to see what would develop?
The Energy traveling outward from the pebble point would be kind of a rotary, cycloid motion, actually momentarily have zero velocity at the bottom, similar to walking where the soles of your feet are at rest with any surface. (not talking about walking on water here, the subject of mythology) as you move on.
The Idea is: the Universe is moving through time, since the start, expanding in the process. Here in a model not as a sphere, but a circle.
K I'm guessing this is the link. https://www.newscientist.com/articl...ave-hints-of-a-theory-beyond-quantum-physics/
And by the way are you really 87 because that is what your profile says.
underline added.How does time exist without the three dimensions of , height ( depth ) , breadth and length ( all which exist together ) ? Physical reality and space , simultaneously exist . Not separate from each other .
That is understood. The idea, that the universe is a form of energy moving through time as a wave as a model allows for room to accommodate such distortion, this is a thought experiment after all.Clearly from galaxies , quasars , suns and planets etc . The Universe is three dimensional . All have spherical depth .
I like the wave in question to be thought of to be just perfect, but as a concept in a thought experiment it could be without measurable thickness.That there is a world , smaller that the quantum.
↑
you are giving time a physical dimension .
yes I do in the sense that I remove one of the 3 space dimensions and assign its picture to time. and What prompts me to do that, is the thoughts now advanced by the likes of Penrose, Kraus, Carroll, that time is not confined to the universe and does not exists only since the Big Beginning Bang.
Right. Time is the consequence of existence. and since energy is un-created, un-destroyable, Time is as an adjunct to an Ur-energy that must have always been.-Time is not an energy form solely on its own .
Right. Time is the consequence of existence. and since energy is un-created, un-destroyable, Time is as an adjunct to an Ur-energy that must have always been.-
Even prior to the movement of matter that started with the "Big bang". The Drop of the Pebble, in this model.
Time exists whether a wave moves through it or not.
Strangely, the wave seems to pick up "dark" energy as is moves out, expands.
How does a wave move " through " time ? ( high lighted ) Explain further