DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Exactly. That is racist, exclusive and segregationist.As a comparison, it is certainly true that a big club that doesn't allow any blacks is a "choice" the members can make.
Exactly. That is racist, exclusive and segregationist.As a comparison, it is certainly true that a big club that doesn't allow any blacks is a "choice" the members can make.
If you insist.Right, and they are doing that more and more often. Good to see the old misogynist religions failing - but they are still misogynist.
I simply wouldn't join their big club. That would be my personal choice.As a comparison, it is certainly true that a big club that doesn't allow any blacks is a "choice" the members can make. I am still glad they have almost completely died out.
That's funny.You still don't see the problem with sexism and segregation.
Boys: "Let's make the living room a Boys Only Club."
Girls: "That's not fair. You can't deny us access based on our sex."
Boys: "Look, there's a whole dining room. Why don't you make it a Girls Only Club? That's fair, right?'"
Girls: "No it's not. We don't want to be equally sexist. We want to eliminate sexism!"
No need to insist; it's pretty much the definition.If you insist.
Nor would I. But I am very glad that that kind of racism is disappearing. Excluding people based on their skin color is pretty odious.I simply wouldn't join their big club. That would be my personal choice.
But do you see the problem?That's funny.
Male authority is hatred of women? So, if I have a women supervisor, that is mysandry?No need to insist; it's pretty much the definition.
Agreed. But I'm not in a position nor do I want to have the authority to deny them their right to Free AssociationNor would I. But I am very glad that that kind of racism is disappearing. Excluding people based on their skin color is pretty odious.
Male authority (with female authority being banned by edict) is an ingrained predudice against women. From Merriam Webster:Male authority is hatred of women?
If you have a woman supervisor, and you are forever banned from promotion to her position because you are male, then yes - that is misandry.So, if I have a women supervisor, that is mysandry?
Read that again carefully, bill. Certainly it exists in our world, but it's not a blanket statement for everyone you dislike. You might also consider that women can be respected and appreciated for being women, not for being mendislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women.
?? Right. There are plenty of people I don't like who aren't misogynists. It is merely a blanket statement for people who have an ingrained prejudice against women doing what men can do.Read that again carefully, bill. Certainly it exists in our world, but it's not a blanket statement for everyone you dislike.
Sure. If someone is a great mother, that's a worthy accomplishment. And if you want to honor women who are exceptional nurses, or queens, or engineers, again - great.You might also consider that women can be respected and appreciated for being women, not for being men
Are we allowed to have a Boys Only Club? I promise they can have a Girls Only Club. What if we have a club that allows girls but stipulates they can't lead the gathering? I promise they can have the same club where the roles are reversed. Are people allowed choices in our society, bill?Just don't tell them they can't be engineers, and they should be happy to be respected and appreciated as nurses.
If you like. I wouldn't want to join it, but if it floats your boat . . . .Are we allowed to have a Boys Only Club? I promise they can have a Girls Only Club.
Again, if it floats your boat, go for it. I would consider that a misogynist (or to Wegs' point, a sexist) club.What if we have a club that allows girls but stipulates they can't lead the gathering?
Of course. You have the freedom to join a misogynist club. Others have the right to call you a misogynist. Women can decide to join that club, or not, or to make their own club, or to have an abortion, or not have one. Ain't freedom great?I promise they can have the same club where the roles are reversed. Are people allowed choices in our society, bill?
This is my third time asking:Are we allowed to have a Boys Only Club? I promise they can have a Girls Only Club. What if we have a club that allows girls but stipulates they can't lead the gathering? I promise they can have the same club where the roles are reversed. Are people allowed choices in our society, bill?
This is my third time asking:
Do you see the problem with exclusive clubs and their relationship to segregation?
Great. Now, do you see the problem with exclusive clubs (white-only for example) and their relationship to segregation?In short, I've never been a member of an exclusive club.
Would the same problem exist for Black-only, Latin-only, Asian-only, etc.? Should I have a problem with Jews hanging out with each other? Where does it begin and end, Bob?Great. Now, do you see the problem with exclusive clubs (white-only for example) and their relationship to segregation?
Surprisingly, it works. Not too many people harass nuns.I just stumbled on a thread here, from a few years ago, whereby the OP (male) suggests for all women to wear burkas in order to not ''inspire'' men to touch and harass them.
And that would be an example of misogyny, everyone.