Mathematical theory of everything

Waiter_2001 said:
0+1=1
1+2=3
3+3=6
6+4=10
10+5=15
15+6=21
21+7=28
28+8=36
36+9=45

The calculator I use is not set to a shorter number of decimal places: some calculations produce more decimal places but this calculation does not.
Click to expand...
Your claim was (and I quote from the OP) "here is another calculation computers cannot fully grasp:
0+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9=45"
You were shown that a computer is quite capable of doing such a calculation.
As for the above: it's irrelevant. And so is your mention of decimal places.
 
Waiter_2001 said:
The equation in reference was:
((((45*45)+1)/46)-1)
Click to expand...
Which has
A) nothing to do with 0+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9=45 (and you STILL haven't explained why that's supposedly "another calculation computers cannot fully grasp", nor addressed the fact that it has been shown to NOT be so).
B) Been shown to be calculable by a computer.
 
Then set your processing to a greater number of decimal places please! I'm quite certain the cumpter will still not present the correct value...you must calculate the equation manually. Are you aware of how to do long-division???
 
Waiter_2001 said:
Then set your processing to a greater number of decimal places please! I'm quite certain the cumpter will still not present the correct value...you must calculate the equation manually.
Click to expand...
Don't be ridiculous.
A computer will work to any precision required. And do so faster than a human.
I note that, yet again, you have failed to address the failure of your claim "another calculation computers cannot fully grasp: 0+1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9=45".
Off to the ignore list...
 
You have not quoted correctly! You missed a quotation mark at the beginning. Off to the ignore list!

...and you put the full-stop in the wrong place!
 
Well it had to happen sooner or later.

On a forum so plagued with pseudoscientists, it was only a matter of time until we got a pseudomathematician.
 
Waiter_2001 said:
Then set your processing to a greater number of decimal places please! I'm quite certain the cumpter will still not present the correct value...you must calculate the equation manually. Are you aware of how to do long-division???
Click to expand...
The clean answer is 990/23. The decimal answer is 43.[0434782608695652173913], where the portion in brackets is infinitely repeated. Since the decimal representation does not terminate, a basic calculator will only be able to approximate it, but Wolfram Alpha found it exactly in about three seconds. I'm morbidly curious where you're going with this.
 
Waiter:

You have been shown that computers can and do give the correct answer to both of the calculations you posted.

Please post your admission that you were wrong. It would be good if you could also apologise to our members for wasting their time.
 
This is also everything:

(10*10)(/1/(10*10))

4 operators:*//*

or:

100/0.01

=(100/0.01)*100

=10000/1

=10000

Words can be used with operators i.e.

Paper*100/(Paper/100)

=Paper00/Pap.er

=Paper0000/Paper

=10000

:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top