manipulating electrons and quarks to negate gravity

yes again its not negating gravity
So the first sentence of your opening post was incorrect? OK.

it is using the resonance of the atoms inner workings
What resonance are you referring to exactly?

to slow or stop an electrons multi spacial properties
What are "multi spatial properties"?

in between oscilations of the field
The oscillations of what field exactly?

the electron goes about being an electron meanwhile you have most of the mass exited to the same frequency
How can mass be excited to a frequency?

when the electron winks out
Again, what does "winking out" mean?

it exerts a force on the rest of the atomic structure not negating gravity
Aha, so it is producing a force to counter gravity, not to remove the force of gravity. Got it.

How does this force know which direction gravity is operating in? All forces relevant at the atomic scale I know of do not couple with gravity in this way.

its using time to hoodwink gravity
What does it mean to "hoodwink gravity"?

by slipping the mass a millisecond out of said time
What does it mean to "slip a mass a millisecond out of time"?

All of this is starting to sound more and more like word-salad. Perhaps this thread should be moved into the fringe-subsection of this forum. (And it seems exchemist agrees.)

not einstine
(That is not my nickname; please type it correctly.)

do you think this could be the electrons being manipulated but the labour is done by electron quasiparticle entrophic entangelment einstines spooky theory at work?
Since "electron quasiparticle entrophic entangelment einstines spooky theory at work" is gibberish and thus doesn't exist, no, I don't think that has anything to do with it.

the electrons are constantly vibrating to some degree and if you want to get technical evrything has a resonate frequency and its pseudo quasiparticle entangelment via entropic electron and bozeon

it means the electron goes back to its normal state of evrywhere and nowhere now and anytime inside the atom thats its spacial anomoly r you fucking with me or testing me because i will eat shit to learn but not if your making light you have to know this is big

i dont care when i get the nobel i wont even thik of you two i can explain this to anyone with a 100 iq you arent going to teach me shit are ya

the electrons are constantly vibrating to some degree
If you are talking about the thermal vibrations, then yes (when not at absolute zero temperature), that's correct.

and if you want to get technical evrything has a resonate frequency
Everything solid, sure.

and its pseudo quasiparticle entangelment via entropic electron and bozeon
That is gibberish; you appear to just be stringing words together, resulting in a meaningless word-salad.

it means the electron goes back to its normal state of evrywhere and nowhere now and anytime inside the atom
The normal state of an electron doesn't say that the electron is everywhere, nor that is it nowhere (and how can it be both at the same time anyway?), nor that it is anytime.

thats its spacial anomaly
If that's the normal state, it's not an anomaly. Also, if it's "now and anytime", wouldn't it be a temporal anomaly too?

r you fucking with me
No, I'm not f*cking with you; either there is a language barrier, or you appear to be using words and terminology differently than mainstream science. I'm just trying to understand what you mean; no need to get insulting.

or testing me because i will eat shit to learn

but not if your making light you have to know this is big
I am not; I'm just trying to understand what you are saying.

i dont care
You should; if other people cannot understand what you are saying, you are not going to convince other people of the correctness of your claims.

when i get the nobel
If you are merely following the work of Edward Leedskalnin, I think the Nobel Prize would be awarded to him. However, the Nobel Prize isn't awarded posthumously, so that's not going to happen either, I'm afraid.

i wont even thik of you two
Good, letting things go is an important skill to have.

i can explain this to anyone with a 100 iq
I suppose that could be contrived to be an insult of my intelligence... Good thing you don't know my actual IQ, so your statement clearly doesn't refer to me.

you arent going to teach me shit are ya
(Again, please watch your language.) I'm not trying to teach you anything; I'm trying to get you to teach me.

I have been to coral castle along us1 south of Miami many years ago.

It is interesting but not a feat requiring new science.

It was built with pulleys, levers, inclined planes, etc. that were available to builders and engineers at the time.

No mystery to a structural engineer but worth the price of admission.

I have been to coral castle along us1 south of Miami many years ago.

It is interesting but not a feat requiring new science.

It was built with pulleys, levers, inclined planes, etc. that were available to builders and engineers at the time.

No mystery to a structural engineer but worth the price of admission.

Hmm...

Yet nobody saw any evidence of any of these devices .

Yet nobody saw any evidence of any of these devices .
There is no evidence of any devices used to construct or erect the Statue of Liberty, Hmm

If you remove the protons and neutrons from an atom, there's no atom any more. Is there?

just guessing here but if you apply an anti matter force that ocilates a wave function to form a cantilever force that pushes back against gravity, then E=MC2 is not butt hurt.

... kinda like gravitational lensing with magnets

but i am just postulising

*magnets being a harmonic field resonance generator of some variety

just guessing here but if you apply an anti matter force
What is an "anti matter force"?

that ocilates a wave function
Is the wave function oscillating, or is the force causing an oscillation of the wave function?

to form a cantilever force that pushes back against gravity,
What does gravity have to do with this? Gravity is an insignificant force at this scale, compared to the electromagnetic and strong interaction forces.

then E=MC2 is not butt hurt.
Why would anything violate \$\$E=mc^2\$\$ in the first place?

... kinda like gravitational lensing with magnets
How is an anti matter force similar to the magnetic force?

but i am just postulising
Honestly, it looks more like word-salad to me...

*magnets being a harmonic field resonance generator of some variety
In what way are magnets "harmonic field generators of some variety"?

i dont care when i get the nobel i wont even thik of you two i can explain this to anyone with a 100 iq you arent going to teach me shit are ya
(penny drops)

99.99999% have absolutely NO intention of teaching you anything.

there is haggling
there is shouting
there is teaching

chance of #3 is around 0.00001%

Where have I said that?
here.

Honestly, it looks more like word-salad to me...
thus everything above what you have just labelled as honest,
all content from before the point you started being honest

How is an anti matter force similar to the magnetic force?
Why would anything violate E=mc2E=mc^2 in the first place?
What does gravity have to do with this? Gravity is an insignificant force at this scale, compared to the electromagnetic and strong interaction forces.
Is the wave function oscillating, or is the force causing an oscillation of the wave function?
What is an "anti matter force"?

here.
thus everything above what you have just labelled as honest,
all content from before the point you started being honest
Ah, I see where your confusion is coming from. In English, it's a sort of short-hand for "In my honest opinion" (at least, that's how I've been taught it). I prefaced that sentence to make it explicitly clear that I was just giving my opinion at the time.

I see you've chosen to ignore my other questions? What is your opinion on the "intellectual honesty" of a person doing that?

Ah, I see where your confusion is coming from. In English, it's a sort of short-hand for "In my honest opinion" (at least, that's how I've been taught it). I prefaced that sentence to make it explicitly clear that I was just giving my opinion at the time.

I see you've chosen to ignore my other questions? What is your opinion on the "intellectual honesty" of a person doing that?

realising the importance of the use of language in scientific terms you have decided to flog a dead horse that you lead to water then shot because it asked if there was a different flavour water availible.

the "flogging" part of your post is "shouting" the same thing "etherial honesty" as a metaphor to subframe the debate into a pre coded version of what you intend to pull out of it.

So the first sentence of your opening post was incorrect? OK.

Kevin paul wood said:
yes again its not negating gravity
So the first sentence of your opening post was incorrect? OK.

the application of the technical specificity is important ?

thus injecting the term "honesty" should suddenly be translated into something else ?
In what way are magnets "harmonic field generators of some variety"?
... ?

of "any" variety ?

intellectualy honest ?

you appear to be trolling.
i look forward to you proving me wrong.

Last edited:
you are not usualy honest ?
Polite people try not to be too honest when it comes to criticizing. Reticence is the better part of manners.

All of NE's comments were polite, but the one about word salad was his reticence cracking, and having to criticize KPW's comment.
A perfectly legitimate use of the word 'honestly'.

you appear to be trolling.
NE is doing what can only be described as the very opposite of trolling.
He is patiently, and politely attempting to get KPW's to explain his comments so that he can address them.

KPW is indeed using words and phrases that are, to be generous, scientifically ambiguous.

KPW should be encouraged to nurture his interest in science, but should also be encouraged to learn that the way to a Nobel prize is by educating himself in the area of his interest, so as to meaningfully ask questions.

If anyone could be accused the trolling, it might be you, for trying to take the conversation toward attacking another member who is engaged in a discussion. Don't be that guy.

NE is doing what can only be described as the very opposite of trolling.
He is patiently, and politely attempting to get KPW's to explain his comments so that he can address them.

KPW is indeed using words and phrases that are, to be generous, scientifically ambiguous.

KPW should be encouraged to nurture his interest in science, but should also be encouraged to learn that the way to a Nobel prize is by educating himself in the area of his interest, so as to meaningfully ask questions.

If anyone could be accused the trolling, it might be you, for trying to take the conversation toward attacking another member who is engaged in a discussion. Don't be that guy.

i conceed your points to err on my ignorance while accepting your greater comprehention of NE's meanings.
noting some subjects are off limits...
suffice to say the magic of magnets & harmonic reasonance production manipulation etc is quite a fringe science.

having lightly read on the coral castle it could have been built by mexican slave labour for all we know.
noting if it were possible to produce gravity, thus it possible to produce a gravity field(of some type)
"Gravity" being quite the scientific mystery box etc... bosons etc... is harmonic reasonance subject to gravitational influence & vice versa
right out on the fringe for an example were it possible to produce cold fusion in a cell phone size machine it might open up mechanics of things that currently appear outside the known range of newtonian physics.

how long did it take for the global corporate science department to decide cell phone towers were probably not too awfully bad for anyone as long as they dont put one in the CEOs' back yard...