Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370

This mystery has been solved long time ago.
It won't be solved until the main body of the aircraft is located. And maybe not even then.
watch Green dot aviation chanel
How about you give us a link to where the green dot aviation channel has posted the solution to the mystery?
Spoiler Capitan kiled all on board and himself too.
How did the Green dot aviation channel determine that?
Investigators found his home computer plan practice on how to do it.
As far as I am aware, the captain of the aircraft had a home flight simulator setup, which is not uncommon among airline pilots. One of the routes programmed into the simulator was similar to the route that it is thought that MH370 probably flew. But how many routes in total were programmed into that simulator?

It wouldn't be an unusual occurrence for somebody to crash a plane into an ocean on a flight simulator. Would it?
 
No. I'm not going to watch a 1 hour 13 minute video.

Give me the time stamps for where the proof is that the Captain is responsible and I'll watch that part.
The evidence is compelling, I watched it all and a similar video previously with the same points.

Topping up the air pressure for cock pit O2.
The flight path, timing.
The disabling of the transponder and satellite communication system.
Switching the system on again inadvertently.
Captain's home flight simulator data.

These details are spread out a little James. I will find the exact stamp of a couple once in in work.
 
From 12 minutes on is where he switches the transponder off, the settings on the dial give a picture.

14.20 ACARS and SatCom disabled manually.

44.20 SDU Arcs inadvertently created when he rebooted the systems to cool the computer. James R
 
Last edited:
From 12 minutes on is where he switches the transponder off, the settings on the dial give a picture.

14.20 ACARS and SatCom disabled manually.

44.20 SDU Arcs inadvertently created when he rebooted the systems to cool the computer. James R
Can you summarise the proposed scenario and the evidence they have for it?
 
Just curious: would a trained pilot need to use a simulator to figure out how to dump his jet in the ocean. I'm not the world's foremost expert on aviation but don't you just push the stick/yoke forward? So... we'd need the FDR, wouldn't we?
 
Just curious: would a trained pilot need to use a simulator to figure out how to dump his jet in the ocean. I'm not the world's foremost expert on aviation but don't you just push the stick/yoke forward? So... we'd need the FDR, wouldn't we?
The route he took yes, he had to hit the correct air space and turn off the kit at the precise time.
This needed practice.

Why won't anyone watch the bloody video!? It is not flowery or glossy, it is succinct, technical where it needs to be and the narrator has a very relaxing Irish accent.
 
Can you summarise the proposed scenario and the evidence they have for it?
All the things I cited were logged by sat comms and flight tower data.
Also the maintenance log had the O2 top up request.
Flight path was logged till he turned off the transponder, the exact moment he turned the generator that powers the ACARS and SatCom com was logged.
The intermediate settings were logged.
The hourly SDU Arcs were all logged by satellite.
The flight attendants phone connecting to last tower was logged.
All the flight simulator data was logged.

The theory is that this was a planned hijack by this lone pilot, he hid the plane from the tower after leaving Malaysian air space as this was the small window he could do this.
He timed leaving one air space, and entering another, Vietnamese, to disable the planes communication capacity to air traffic contro making the plane invisible.
By the time the plane did not check in, he had already gone 100s of miles off course eventually heading out towards the Indian Ocean.
Air traffic control made attempts to contact the plane but these calls were ignored.
The planes path was logged and an experienced pilot must have been involved to choose that flight path and time all the tech.
 
Guys I get it, posting a video is not cricket. However in this case I recommend you at least listen from 10.20, my summary simply does not do this justice.

In terms of speculation there is some here, the second pilot either had to be complicit or had to be removed from the picture. The theory assumes he is put out of the picture along with the 200 plus passengers.

The data is the data though.
 
Guys I get it, posting a video is not cricket. However in this case I recommend you at least listen from 10.20, my summary simply does not do this justice.

In terms of speculation there is some here, the second pilot either had to be complicit or had to be removed from the picture. The theory assumes he is put out of the picture along with the 200 plus passengers.

The data is the data though.
Yes, but the data doesn’t really point to this scenario, though it is consistent with it. What do they think about intention and motive? Is there any evidence about that?
 
Yes, but the data doesn’t really point to this scenario, though it is consistent with it. What do they think about intention and motive? Is there any evidence about that?
Nothing about that.
It fits the terrorist narrative in one way but not in others.

He killed 240 people, check.
No one is sure what actually happened, or if he did it. Not check.
Terrorism is meant to send a message, to cause terror.
This was confusion, mystery.

Was he depressed, wife went off with another guy, drug addiction, bankruptcy?
None of that was mentioned, if any of those issues were uncovered I think they would have been mentioned.
Both pilots came under huge scrutiny following the incident.
 
"44.20 SDU Arcs inadvertently created when he rebooted the systems to cool the computer."

I'm way out of the loop and may not even be talking about the same incident but the system rebooted when main power failed and the ram generator kicked in.
 
The route he took yes, he had to hit the correct air space and turn off the kit at the precise time.
This needed practice.
Thanks. I will look at the bloody video, at 10:20, as time permits. :)


A new search expedition launched just today.
Yes, I posted on this impending search three weeks ago - that was the necropost which resurrected this thread after its eleven year hibernation. Hope they find FDR (the box, not the remains of the former US president).
 
The video Scorp posted does assemble some compelling evidence. The evasions do seem carefully orchestrated, and I can see the motivation to conceal actions such that the pilot's family is spared shame and horror. The pilot missing some knowledge of SDU and Inmarsat interaction I am still trying to understand, but seems like it makes sense. I might have to review some sections of the video.

Seems like real closure would be to uncover the pilot's mental state. It suggests it's possible to have an extended psychosis where one seems outwardly normal and functional, and yet capable of mass murder. I would wonder if there were patterns in Zaharie's life that would be congruent with some mass shooters. That mystery is so confounding because mass shooters are usually not highly respected individuals whose job is to protect the lives of hundreds of people. That type seems more likely to fall on their own sword than take out others. When I look at investigation into Zaharie, I don't see a lot of telltales. He seemed to have a penchant for political rants that raised eyebrows, but so do many people. The rest I'm seeing is rumours that for me just don't add up to much.
 
The video Scorp posted does assemble some compelling evidence. The evasions do seem carefully orchestrated, and I can see the motivation to conceal actions such that the pilot's family is spared shame and horror
You watched all of it?

The Oxygen top up data, simulator data, flight path, satellite data and air traffic control data is factual.

Everything else is speculation but you have to ask, who could have planned and carried this out? To this level of precision?
 
Back
Top