The person in the particular video in question has been shown to be a total "unknown" fraudster, and u tube is known to be open to those sorts of people.
Certainly, I have two reputable u tube videos of two recognised mainstream scientists on this thread myself!
Certainly, I have two reputable u tube videos of two recognised mainstream scientists on this thread myself!
But just as the nature of the Internet itself, leaves it open to all the nuts, god botherers and conspiracy pushers that find it as the only outlet to push their nonsense, so to has the u tube video become a similar tool of spreading nonsensical claims etc.
Most here though, certainly know what exchemist was referring to.
Generally yes....but when u tube videos are continually being posted by certain individuals, and the usual unscientific outlandish claims being made, such as per river's video that magnetism/electricity is the prime initiator of the universe we inhabit, or that Aliens have conducted nuclear wars on Mars, then one can use reasonable logic with regards to any video by that person.
Can't you? Of course you can! and I make no apologies for that...Oh and btw, I did watch the first 10 minutes which was enough for me.When they are exclusively pushed on u tube by virtually unknowns, who are unqualified, uncredentialed, or on forums such as this, and open to any Tom, Dick and Harry.
Not at all. I could easily get such a u tube confirmed by other reputable citation and/or link.....easy peasy!
Yes, I could.
Einstein's theories were confirmed by observation, experimentation and their predictability, not on u tube, that you obviously chose to spread your gospel. Which is evidence of crackpottery.
Sorry MR my old friend...I stopped at the second name on your list, and of course your usual nonsensical blanket crticism of science in general.
That says it all, and highlights the general overall untrue claim of your article and of course yourself. Galileo of course was around before science as we know it, had any chance to get a foothold, as humanity at that time was ruled by superstition, paranormal and supernatural nonsense and the church in general.
So much for your ignorance, that you failed to note my "science as we know it" relevance. Lol!
So much for your ignorance, that you failed to note my "science as we know it" relevance. Lol!
You certainly like living in ignorance, and bliss!
Science was born the first time someone observed a regular natural pattern and asked ...why ?
Don't be so dishonestly obtuse MR.......
Well, it depends on the context of the question, when was the first symbolic representation of an observed pattern recorded on a cave wall, or formalizing a pattern into symbolic language or equation as did Galilei.