Luminiferous Aether Exists!

[gravitational_aether]

"Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter IS gravity."

You are saying that pressure is gravity... Absolutly Wrong..Just think about this air puts pressure on you.. Your body puts opposite pressure.IT cancels out... According to your theory Gravity is distributed equally around the object..Which is very wrong.. You will find that gravity well in space-time is more at the center...Just look the image of gravity well in internet...Gravity well that is highest is near to straight aligning towards the center..In your theory,Pressure is what creates gravity.So it is distributed equally around the object..You cannot create variable pressure...In your case pressure is arising outside..In space-time case,it is right from center as it is understood as deep gravity well is created straight aligning towards center...If pressure varies,You will say gravity varies which is not the case.SO YOUR THEORY IS WRONG.....

Check out the second part of my response here for articles which refer to the pressure of the aether being responsible for gravity and other articles which refer to dark matter as aether.

'An Extended Dynamical Equation of Motion, Phase Dependency and Inertial Backreaction'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3458

"We hypothesize that space itself resists such surges according to a kind of induction law (related to inertia); additionally, we provide further evidence of the “fluidic” nature of space itself."

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid, a supersolid, which is described in the article as the 'fluidic' nature of space itself. The 'back-reaction' described in the article is the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the matter.

 

[ash64449]

Gravitational waves are massive waves moving through space.

'Surprise! IBEX Finds No Bow ‘Shock’ Outside our Solar System'
http://www.universetoday.com/95094/surprise-ibex-finds-no-bow-shock-outside-our-solar-system/

'“While bow shocks certainly exist ahead of many other stars, we’re finding that our Sun’s interaction doesn’t reach the critical threshold to form a shock,” said Dr. David McComas, principal investigator of the IBEX mission, “so a wave is a more accurate depiction of what’s happening ahead of our heliosphere — much like the wave made by the bow of a boat as it glides through the water.”'

The wave ahead of our heliosphere is an aether displacement wave. This is evidence of a moving 'particle', the solar system, having an associated aether wave.

'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter'
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html

"Astronomers using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark mater, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water."

The 'pond' consists of aether. The moving 'particles' are the galaxy clusters. The ripple is an aether displacement wave. The ripple is a gravitational wave. This is also evidence of a moving 'particle', the galaxy clusters, having an associated aether wave.

'Giant black hole kicked out of home galaxy'
http://www.astronomy.com/en/News-Ob...ant black hole kicked out of home galaxy.aspx

"But these new data support the idea that gravitational waves — ripples in the fabric of space first predicted by Albert Einstein but never detected directly — can exert an extremely powerful force."

The fabric of space is the aether.

Gravitational waves are ripples in the aether.

What ripples when galaxy clusters collide is what waves in a double slit experiment; the aether.

Einstein's gravitational wave is the same physical phenomenon as de Broglie's pilot-wave. They are both waves in the aether.

Gravitational waves are caused by massive objects moving through and displacing the aether. Light waves are photon 'particles' which have an associated wave in the aether.

So, there are similarities. However, I don't think you would say the wave created by a huge asteroid crashing into the ocean is the same wave at the same frequency as a peeble of sand tossed into the ocean.

YOu haven't explained to what i have said that pressure is gravity is totally wrong..Answer to that one....

 

[gravitational_aether]

YOu haven't explained to what i have said that pressure is gravity is totally wrong..Answer to that one....

See the articles in the second part of my response here.

There is also the following.

'An Extended Dynamical Equation of Motion, Phase Dependency and Inertial Backreaction'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3458

"We hypothesize that space itself resists such surges according to a kind of induction law (related to inertia); additionally, we provide further evidence of the “fluidic” nature of space itself."

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid, a supersolid, which is described in the article as the 'fluidic' nature of space itself. The 'back-reaction' described in the article is the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the matter.

 

[ash64449]

See the articles in the second part of my response here.

There is also the following.

'An Extended Dynamical Equation of Motion, Phase Dependency and Inertial Backreaction'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3458

"We hypothesize that space itself resists such surges according to a kind of induction law (related to inertia); additionally, we provide further evidence of the “fluidic” nature of space itself."

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid, a supersolid, which is described in the article as the 'fluidic' nature of space itself. The 'back-reaction' described in the article is the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the matter.

In This article: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.5654v2.pdf

I found this:

Following [20], the action of the nonminimal aether-modified gravity looks like
S = A
Z
d
D
x
p
|g|(
1
2
R + αgu
a
u
b
Rab + Lmat), (6)
with A is a constant whose dimension and value depends on the dimension of the spacetime,

 

[ash64449]

See the articles in the second part of my response here.

There is also the following.

'An Extended Dynamical Equation of Motion, Phase Dependency and Inertial Backreaction'
http://arxiv.org/abs/1208.3458

"We hypothesize that space itself resists such surges according to a kind of induction law (related to inertia); additionally, we provide further evidence of the “fluidic” nature of space itself."

The aether is, or behaves similar to, a superfluid with properties of a solid, a supersolid, which is described in the article as the 'fluidic' nature of space itself. The 'back-reaction' described in the article is the displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the matter.

In One of your given articles,I found this:
Following [20], the action of the nonminimal aether-modified gravity looks like

THAT EQUATION

with A is a constant whose dimension and value depends on the dimension of the spacetime,

What has dimensions to do with the aether?

 

[gravitational_aether]

In This article: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1109.5654v2.pdf

I found this:

Following [20], the action of the nonminimal aether-modified gravity looks like
S = A
Z
d
D
x
p
|g|(
1
2
R + αgu
a
u
b
Rab + Lmat), (6)
with A is a constant whose dimension and value depends on the dimension of the spacetime,

There is also the following from the same article.

"We have showed the compatibility of the G ̈del metric with the nonminimal aether-modified gravity. It turns out to be that if Lorentz breaking is enough small, the matter providing this compatibility is usual (neither ghost nor phantom one) although its energy-momentum tensor differs from that one in the case of the usual gravity by terms of the first order in the parameter of aether coupling αg . Another key conclusion is that the Lorentz symmetry breaking in the form of the nonminimal aether modification, for the usual matter, at least for small Lorentz breaking does not make obstacles to the existence of the closed timelike curves (CTCs) whose existence is characteristic for the G ̈del metric."

There aether is described as matter. Meaning, aether has mass.

 

[gravitational_aether]

In One of your given articles,I found this:
Following [20], the action of the nonminimal aether-modified gravity looks like

THAT EQUATION

with A is a constant whose dimension and value depends on the dimension of the spacetime,

What has dimensions to do with the aether?

I'm guessing they are using the term 'dimension' to refer to size or volume occupied by the aether.

 

[origin]

You have said that "The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether".

What do you mean by that?

 

[gravitational_aether]

You have said that "The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether".

What do you mean by that?

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

What they detected in the following article is the effect the aether displaced by the Milky Way, which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the Milky Way, has on the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy.

'Milky Way's halo more squished than spherical'
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3473567...ys-halo-more-squished-spherical/#.TjkpbmDmE2c

"The scientists used measurements of the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy, one of the largest of the small galaxies circling the Milky Way."

Non-baryonic dark matter has been shown not to be anchored to matter. This means matter moves through and displaces the aether.

The following image respresents the state of displacement of the aether.

http://www.crystalinks.com/darkmatterpur.jpg

(image from this article: http://www.crystalinks.com/darkmatter.html)

 

[origin]

Why does the 'displaced aether' form a halo around the galaxy? Is the 'displaced aether' somehow different than 'regular aether'? Doesn't a well defined halo mean that gravity (if caused by your displaced aether) would not follow the $$ \frac{1}{r^2} $$ rule? Perhaps this could be used as a test of your idea.

 

[ash64449]

I'm guessing they are using the term 'dimension' to refer to size or volume occupied by the aether.

Nope!!! I found that in your article.What has "Dimensions have to do with aether"?????

 

[ash64449]

Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... disregarding the causes which condition its state."

The state of the aether at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether.

What they detected in the following article is the effect the aether displaced by the Milky Way, which is pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward the Milky Way, has on the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy.

'Milky Way's halo more squished than spherical'
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3473567...ys-halo-more-squished-spherical/#.TjkpbmDmE2c

"The scientists used measurements of the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy, one of the largest of the small galaxies circling the Milky Way."

Non-baryonic dark matter has been shown not to be anchored to matter. This means matter moves through and displaces the aether.

The following image respresents the state of displacement of the aether.

http://www.crystalinks.com/darkmatterpur.jpg

(image from this article: http://www.crystalinks.com/darkmatter.html)

Oh!! You are referring Dark matter as that?? The you should explain how aether can explain the " missing mass ".....
You are referring Gravity as putting inward pressure???!! Well you said photons are particles that moves in aether... SO PHOTONS DISPLACES AETHER WHICH MEANS IT HAS TINY TINY TINY MASS... That means photons can
fall in the presence of gravity.. You know the equation to calculate it. GMm/d2."M" mass of earth and m pass of photon according to your thoery. So light will fall towards earth just like ordinary matter.. I know Light gets deflected by gravity..but you have ensure that it is indirect because Gravity actually bends space-time as a result it falls.I.e change in configuration of MEDIUM of light caused it.... I think you have understood what i said.I.e light doesn't create any curvature on space-time.But ordinary matter do.According to your Theory(Space-time as aether) It can displace space-time(aether) Which is totally wrong..I hope u have understood it.. I am sure somewhere you mentioned that photon is a particle that moves through aether.... And also Your pressure thing is wrong... Just imagine take a small object which has same mass as larger object.Well attraction power of both are same because they have same mass..But according to your aether theory,it is proportional not to mass but circumference..Larger circumference will displace more.So according to your theory larger object can exert more gravity which is also totally wrong.I am sure that these proofs are enough....

I said it will displace because larger circumference object needs to occupy "space".So larger displacement. This is enough to prove your theory is incorrect...

 

[gravitational_aether]

Why does the 'displaced aether' form a halo around the galaxy?

Because it is displaced by the matter the Milky Way consists of. It's not a halo in the sense that it is traveling with the Milky Way. What is referred to as the halo is the state of displacement of the aether. The Milky Way is moving through the aether. As the matter the Milky Way consists of moves through the aether it is displacing the aether.

You really need to understand the concept that particles of matter move through and displace the aether. You don't have to agree with it, however, if you can't understand it and are going to insist what the 'halo' physically consists of is somehow traveling with the Milky Way then you are completely missing the point.

Is the 'displaced aether' somehow different than 'regular aether'?

Only in that it is being displaced by the matter.

Doesn't a well defined halo mean that gravity (if caused by your displaced aether) would not follow the $$ \frac{1}{r^2} $$ rule? Perhaps this could be used as a test of your idea.

Maybe the following will help you understand how aether is displaced by matter.

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

The offset is due to the galaxy clusters moving through the aether. The analogy is a submarine moving through the water. You are under water. Two miles away from you are many lights. Moving between you and the lights one mile away is a submarine. The submarine displaces the water. The state of displacement of the water causes the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water to be offset from the center of the submarine itself. The offset between the center of the lensing of the light propagating through the water displaced by the submarine and the center of the submarine itself is going to remain the same as the submarine moves through the water. The submarine continually displaces different regions of the water. The state of the water connected to and neighboring the submarine remains the same as the submarine moves through the water even though it is not the same water the submarine continually displaces. This is what is occurring physically in nature as the galaxy clusters move through and displace the aether.

 

[gravitational_aether]

Nope!!! I found that in your article.What has "Dimensions have to do with aether"?????

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dimension

"di·men·sion
1. A measure of spatial extent, especially width, height, or length."

I think they are referring to the spatial extent of the aether.

 

[gravitational_aether]

Oh!! You are referring Dark matter as that?? The you should explain how aether can explain the " missing mass ".....

Aether is the missing mass. There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

 

[origin]

Because it is displaced by the matter the Milky Way consists of. It's not a halo in the sense that it is traveling with the Milky Way. What is referred to as the halo is the state of displacement of the aether. The Milky Way is moving through the aether. As the matter the Milky Way consists of moves through the aether it is displacing the aether.

But you have said space is made up of aether. You have also said that the density or concentration of aether is constant. It follows that there should be no halo. If we look at some region of space, according to your idea, it is made up of aether that has mass, as a galaxy passes through that region of space it displaces the aether, however based on what you have said the aether around the galaxy will not change, except that we can call the aether around the galaxy 'displaced'. The density and concentration of the aether has not changed so what is the halo?

You really need to understand the concept that particles of matter move through and displace the aether. You don't have to agree with it, however, if you can't understand it and are going to insist what the 'halo' physically consists of is somehow traveling with the Milky Way then you are completely missing the point.

Think I got it. It is not traveling with the galaxy, the question remains why is it detectable?

'Offset between dark matter and ordinary matter: evidence from a sample of 38 lensing clusters of galaxies'
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1004/1004.1475v1.pdf

"Our data strongly support the idea that the gravitational potential in clusters is mainly due to a non-baryonic fluid, and any exotic field in gravitational theory must resemble that of CDM fields very closely."

Unfortunately the article does not appear to support your conjecture because they talk about a concentration of dark matter (you would say aether), but this violates your assumption that density and concentrarion of the aether is constant.

 

[gravitational_aether]

But you have said space is made up of aether. You have also said that the density or concentration of aether is constant. It follows that there should be no halo. If we look at some region of space, according to your idea, it is made up of aether that has mass, as a galaxy passes through that region of space it displaces the aether, however based on what you have said the aether around the galaxy will not change, except that we can call the aether around the galaxy 'displaced'. The density and concentration of the aether has not changed so what is the halo?

The state of displacement of the aether. The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid.

Think I got it. It is not traveling with the galaxy, the question remains why is it detectable?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casimir_effect#Vacuum_energy

"In a simplified view, a "field" in physics may be envisioned as if space were filled with interconnected vibrating balls and springs, and the strength of the field can be visualized as the displacement of a ball from its rest position."

A 'field' in physics is space filled with aether and the strength of the field is the displacement of the aether from its rest position.

The aether which exists in the center of the Earth is being displaced by the particles of matter the Earth consists of. This aether is more displaced then the aether which is 10 light years away from the Earth. If the only object which existed in the universe were the Earth then the aether 10 light years away from the Earth would be more at rest than the aether connected to and neighboring the particles of matter the Earth consists of.

Unfortunately the article does not appear to support your conjecture because they talk about a concentration of dark matter (you would say aether), but this violates your assumption that density and concentrarion of the aether is constant.

There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter so to discuss its concentation is nonsense. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

The writers of the article probably think non-baryonic dark matter is anchored to the galaxy clusters. Non-baryonic dark matter has been shown to NOT be anchored to matter. So, any discussion about the concentration of the dark matter is nonsense because the notion non-baryonic dark matter travels with matter is nonsense.

There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. What is postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is the aether. Aether has mass. Non-baryonic dark matter is NOT anchored to matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether. Non-baryonic dark matter is not concentrated on the Milky Way because there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter.

What they are mistaking for a concentration of non-baryonic dark matter is the state of displacement of the aether.

 

[origin]

But you have said space is made up of aether. You have also said that the density or concentration of aether is constant. It follows that there should be no halo. If we look at some region of space, according to your idea, it is made up of aether that has mass, as a galaxy passes through that region of space it displaces the aether, however based on what you have said the aether around the galaxy will not change, except that we can call the aether around the galaxy 'displaced'. The density and concentration of the aether has not changed so what is the halo?

The state of displacement of the aether. The aether is, or behaves similar to, a supersolid.

That in no way answers my questions.

The aether which exists in the center of the Earth is being displaced by the particles of matter the Earth consists of. This aether is more displaced then the aether which is 10 light years away from the Earth. If the only object which existed in the universe were the Earth then the aether 10 light years away from the Earth would be more at rest than the aether connected to and neighboring the particles of matter the Earth consists of.

What do you mean 'at rest'? Is the aether moving near the earth in this scenario?

There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter so to discuss its concentation is nonsense. Matter moves through and displaces the aether.

The writers of the article probably think non-baryonic dark matter is anchored to the Milky Way. Non-baryonic dark matter has been shown to NOT be anchored to matter. So, any discussion about the concentration of the dark matter is nonsense because the notion non-baryonic dark matter travels with matter is nonsense.

There is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter. What is postulated as non-baryonic dark matter is the aether. Aether has mass. Non-baryonic dark matter is NOT anchored to matter. Matter moves through and displaces the aether. Non-baryonic dark matter is not concentrated on the Milky Way because there is no such thing as non-baryonic dark matter.

What they are mistaking for a concentration of non-baryonic dark matter is the state of displacement of the aether.

Then it was probably not very useful to use that article to support your case...

 

[gravitational_aether]

That in no way answers my questions.




What do you mean 'at rest'? Is the aether moving near the earth in this scenario?

Einstein defined motion in terms of the aether as the aether does not consist of individual particles which can be separately tracked through time.

The aether is DISPLACED by the earth.

Then it was probably not very useful to use that article to support your case...

I was using the article to explain why there is an offset between the light lensing through the space neighboring the galaxy clusters and the galaxy clusters themselves. The reason for the offset is the galaxy clusters are moving through and displacing the aether.

 

[origin]

The aether is DISPLACED by the earth.

Yes, I understand that your idea is that the aether is displaced by a mass. That still does not seem to answer my questions. It could be that there is something about displaced aether that you are implying and I am missing. Instead of just capitalizing the word displacement you could go just a bit into depth why displaced aether is so important realtive to regular aether.

Here are the questions again.
You have said space is made up of aether. You have also said that the density or concentration of aether is constant. It follows that there should be no halo. If we look at some region of space, according to your idea, it is made up of aether that has mass, as a galaxy passes through that region of space it displaces the aether, however based on what you have said the aether around the galaxy will not change, except that we can call the aether around the galaxy 'displaced'. The density and concentration of the aether has not changed so what is the halo?