Luchito vs evolution

L

Luchito

Registered Senior Member
DaveC426913 said:
So ... what are we saying here? That red light I blew through yesterday because I didn't see it, that will be passed on as "information" to my children by way of my genes?

Is this how we science now?
Click to expand...
I discovered it 25years ago when I found how it happens. in those years biologists confronted weird scenarios, the common one when we "share" genes with other species and even with vegetables.

I was in the middle of a debate challenging silly evolutionists how it comes micro-organisms became macro-organisms.

It was laughable all their answers. Until today deluded evolutionists can't find a solid answer to it. I gave them the answer that, of course, they rejected, even when in those days for the first time the gene human map was shown, and I told them that such map backs up my discovery. One of them started to think about it and telling the others I might be in the right path.

Of course, just because I was against their stupid theory, they rejected it and they still can't find the process. Theory of evolution is a complete stupidity; nature doesn't behave the way they predicted.

Did I say I'm the master's in science? well, modesty apart, yes, I am. Mua mua (kissing my cheek) mua mua mua

Leave the stupidity of Evolution theory and you will find the answer.
 
Luchito said:
Did I say I'm the master's in science? well, modesty apart, yes, I am. Mua mua (kissing my cheek) mua mua mua
Click to expand...
Clearly, you're just another religious moron trolling a forum to deny science. Not a braincell in your head.
Luchito said:
Theory of evolution is a complete stupidity; nature doesn't behave the way they predicted.
Click to expand...
Mr. Anti-Science denies yet another scientific theory. What a dipshit.
 
Luchito said:
Leave the stupidity of Evolution theory and you will find the answer.
Click to expand...
Another one of the most tested, if not THE most tested and verified theories in science.
Pretty much accepted by the science community within about 15 years of publication, so by the 1870s.
You have some catching up to do mate.
 
Pinball1970 said:
Another one of the most tested, if not THE most tested and verified theories in science.
Pretty much accepted by the science community within about 15 years of publication, so by the 1870s.
You have some catching up to do mate.
Click to expand...
It is not by "age" but knowledge, and there is no biology knowledge in Evolution theory.

Darwin inherited his ideas from the common acceptance of an evolutionary process, a process that included the idea that humans are descendants of apes. Plus, those evolution of species theory wasn't born from scientific knowledge but from silly philosophical ideas. In those years philosophy and science were married, but science divorced philosophy when science demanded "evidence". The theory of evolution was born without single scientific evidence but philosophy alone. So, do a favor to yourself, remove evolution theory from science shelves and put it on philosophy stands. Do the right thing.

By the way, if today the new doctrines of the evolution theory say that humans are not descendants of apes, then such is a new theory, by any means is not the 1870 theory, because the arguments of today are opposite, contrary, one against the another from the old theory.

You must understand that one thing is "update/upgrade" and a different scenario is changing the old doctrines by new ones. The evolution theory was not updated but changed. And even with the new changes, still is wrong because when a tree grows up crooked....
 
Luchito said:
It is not by "age" but knowledge, and there is no biology knowledge in Evolution theory.

Darwin inherited his ideas from the common acceptance of an evolutionary process, a process that included the idea that humans are descendants of apes. Plus, those evolution of species theory wasn't born from scientific knowledge but from silly philosophical ideas. In those years philosophy and science were married, but science divorced philosophy when science demanded "evidence". The theory of evolution was born without single scientific evidence but philosophy alone. So, do a favor to yourself, remove evolution theory from science shelves and put it on philosophy stands. Do the right thing.

By the way, if today the new doctrines of the evolution theory say that humans are not descendants of apes, then such is a new theory, by any means is not the 1870 theory, because the arguments of today are opposite, contrary, one against the another from the old theory.

You must understand that one thing is "update/upgrade" and a different scenario is changing the old doctrines by new ones. The evolution theory was not updated but changed. And even with the new changes, still is wrong because when a tree grows up crooked....
Click to expand...
I think this is a separate thread. James R
 
DaveC426913 said:
What you actually said was:

So I'm asking, a third time:

How does information not noticed by the brain become storage in the genes?
Click to expand...
Oh, my bad. you are right. I will slow my reading of other posts.

How much have you paid for learning science? How much books or magazines of science have cost you?

You notice that nothing is for free.

On the other hand, you can ask the same question to theories or discoveries that have been published and have obtained profit for it and have not provided the whole information.

But when it comes from private investigation and has not been released and recovered the investment, you can only receive "the leak".

I didn't come here to make profit, I am participating to show that there are other angles of view to understand science, and that many of the current theories of science are obsolete by lack of evidence.
 
Luchito said:
Did I say I'm the master's in science? well, modesty apart, yes, I am.
Click to expand...
Did I mention that I'm the world's greatest Formula 1 driver? Well, modesty apart, yes, I am. Mua!

(I think that was about as convincing as your silly claim. Don't you?)
 
billvon said:
First off, it is of course a mistake to ask anything of Luchito that requires an intelligent answer.
Click to expand...
Oh absolutely. I've had him on Iggy since his last bout of silliness.

I ask the question, not for him, but for the benefit of the rest of our readers.
 
Luchito said:
How much have you paid for learning science?
Click to expand...
About $150K over the years, going back to 1983. That includes formal education (undergraduate and graduate) trade shows, online courses, professional development courses and books/society memberships. Does not include the people who have mentored me, or the people I apprenticed to.
I didn't come here to make profit, I am participating to show that there are other angles of view to understand science, and that many of the current theories of science are obsolete by lack of evidence.
Click to expand...

No, you came here to stroke your own ego and to try to convince yourself that you are an intelligent free thinker, and not a failure who cannot do basic science or math.
 
Luchito said:
How much have you paid for learning science? How much books or magazines of science have cost you?

You notice that nothing is for free.
Click to expand...
This has nothing to do with the topic. I don't care about your views on the politics of learning.

If you want to obseve evolution in action, feel free to visit any pet store that has puppies or guppies.


Luchito said:
...there are other angles of view to understand science, and that many of the current theories of science are obsolete by lack of evidence.
Click to expand...
What you are showing is that you do not understand science at all. You deny general relativity and yet I have given you examples of time dilation being observed. That's not "other angles of view"; that's straight up denial.

I can insist that I am able to fly - all I have to do is deny the observational evidence that my feet are still on the ground.

You cannot expect to be taken seriously about anything science-related as long as you are in denial about things we actually see happening.


For your edification, as well as interested readers, this guy did an experiment in the back of his camper on a famly trip to Mt. Ranier. You can't get much more "grass roots" than this.

http://www.leapsecond.com/great2005/
http://leapsecond.com/great2005/tour/

Here is his data:
1759426641982.png
His results:

"...the time dilation was somewhere in the 20 to 30 ns range. The number we expected was 23 ns so I'm very pleased with the result."

In case anyone wonders where the expected value versus the observed value is: I have added it to the chart.

This is what we expect if we account for general relativity:
1759427248129.png
 
Last edited:
billvon said:
First off, it is of course a mistake to ask anything of Luchito that requires an intelligent answer.

Secondly, DNA methylation (which deactivates some DNA in some cases) can also be stored in the genome, although not technically stored in the DNA itself. It plays an important role in development. The study of this is called epigenetics.

It can - VERY rarely - be heritable across generations. There is weak evidence, for example, that an aversion to a smell can be inherited in mice. More commonly, epimutations can affect future generations and act much more quickly than normal genetic mutations.
Click to expand...
Definitively you have no idea of what you are made of.
 
James R said:
Did I mention that I'm the world's greatest Formula 1 driver? Well, modesty apart, yes, I am. Mua!

(I think that was about as convincing as your silly claim. Don't you?)
Click to expand...
Congratulations, especially when knowing that you learned how to drive a car after hitting two street poles and running over a dog.
 
Luchito said:
Definitively you have no idea of what you are made of.
Click to expand...
Oh I have a pretty good idea. The human body is fascinating when you can approach it from a position of knowledge rather than a position of "it's all a conspiracy theory and no one knows that better than I do!"

you are making the ridiculous.
Click to expand...

When you try to insult someone, it pays to be able to actually spell the insult correctly. Otherwise you come off looking pretty silly yourself.
 
billvon said:
Oh I have a pretty good idea. The human body is fascinating when you can approach it from a position of knowledge rather than a position of "it's all a conspiracy theory and no one knows that better than I do!"



When you try to insult someone, it pays to be able to actually spell the insult correctly. Otherwise you come off looking pretty silly yourself.
Click to expand...
Well, actually I don't do theories, I test, I compare data, I follow evidence and connect the dots.

Then, from what is found, the conclusions will be obtained from what evidence shows.

If you say species evolve, then I will look for evidence.

For example, if I found a physical and or functional characteristic that doesn't agree with the theory in question, of course I won't buy the metaphorical expressions like "evolution going backwards", no way, I will state what it is in plain English what have happened and provide the correct terms.

The branch of knowledge called science must be respected, and evolutionists are just ignorant who don't know what they are talking about. Such ignorance becomes disrespect towards science when they use their theory as a flag to follow blindly rather than accepting their errors and start anew.

Evolution theory was born from philosophical thoughts from people who like Einstein, imagined a lot but had no knowledge about nature. That is the origin of Evolution theory.

As an almost medieval theory, no wonder its doctrines are full of witches, spells, black magic, dragons, etc.

Face it, we don't need such an ambiguous inheritance anymore. We mus grow in accord to new discoveries and knowledge. Evolutionists are way behind of the new advances in science because they want to relate nature to an obsolete theory.
 
Pinball1970 said:
keep spamming the silly on multiple threads and I will start reporting you.
Click to expand...
I have received even direct insults from other posters, and no complaints from my part.

The joke of mine that you don't like is not even about you, it was directed to another poster and was in reference to a sarcasm of his.

In the bar I used to have drinks with friends, when a fight started we didn't stop playing cards until one of the fighters touched our table, otherwise we didn't care at all about the fight.

Your table wasn't touched, peace.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top