Less sex please, we're geeks!

S.A.M.

S.A.M.

uniquely dreadful
Valued Senior Member
High-school age adolescents with higher IQs and extremely low IQs were less likely to have had first intercourse than those with average to below average intelligence. (i.e. for males with IQs under 70, 63.3% were still virgins, for those with IQs between 70-90 only 50.2% were virgin, 58.6% were virgins with IQs between 90-110, and 70.3% with IQs over 110 were virgins)
Click to expand...

virgins.jpg

​
Another study

Smart teens don't have sex (or kiss much either).

Picture-2-750736.png


Picture-1-720552.png

​
http://scienceblogs.com/gnxp/2006/12/virginity_as_a_function_of_iq.php


Comments?
 
Could it be that the people with low iqs and the people with high iqs were
1. More likely to be living at home.
2. Have less money. The more intelligent would not be earning a full wage while at college.
 
Unless you are gifted with way above average good looks and physical attributes then being attractive to the opposite sex is something you have to work at.

Smart kids are smart mostly because they work at it much harder, many have resigned themselves to not being popular with the opposite sex so they excell in other areas.

That is only during HS because the one who worked hard get the women when they get older but the 'cool' kids are pumping gas. So all the nerds should sit tight.
 
I just meant that it is yet another sex thread, and one talking about how many people get it.... so in reference to that I said "god help me, god..." as to imply I'm forever screwed (though not by a women).
 
Higher IQ types are generally less attractive, hence their stronger desire to show their importance through concentration on academics. Less attractive people are less likely to have sex. Really dumb people are also less attractive - not physically - but mentally.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top