Kiwi123 and Brian Foley
- Thread starter James R
- Start date
- Status
redarmy11 said:
either that, or the voter doesnt read the world events or politics subforums.
Well the deadline has passed, they have not been banned, any further word from you James re this topic?
Last edited:
brian is back to using the politics world section to throw ad homs around. why isnt he banned strictly because of this?
By all means, ban them. Make sure Kiwi is IP-banned, because he has a habit of making sock puppets.
This is actually Bullshit , it is only aimed at me , Kiwi123 is being used here as a sacraficial lamb to add some veneer of even handiness and a facade fairness of judgement to this action . This is a clear indication of James immaturity to moderate and deal with criticism of Israel and Zionist Judaism . His option of locking up posts and deleting posts is vandalism of free expression and speech .James R said:
This is deliberately deceptive in an attempt to portray me as obsessed with Jews . The fact is the last 4 weeks has seen the world political stage dominated by Israels attack on Palestine and Lebanon , I am just posting as events unfold thats what current events is . If you look at the last 20 threads and realise that those about Israel concern the current ramapge in Lebanon which is a crisis . These threads have been taken strategically in that bunch and used deceptively to portray an obsession .James R said:
However I will give sciforums members a true picture and account of my thread subjects :
As of Thursday August 3 2006 I have authoured 287 threads on sciforums since 2004 of these :
64 threads concern Israel , Palestine and Jews worldwide thats 22%
The rest are non related to Jews or Palestinians
37 threads concern Iraq and its occupation 12.8%
34 threads concern Iran 11.8%
22 threads concern 9/11 , Al Qaeda 7.6%
30 threads concerning North Korea , China , Indonesia , Australia 10.5%
16 threads concern American domestic politics 5.6%
16 threads concern Syria / Saudia Arabia various other Arab nations 5.6%
17 threads concern Christianity in the religion forum 5.9%
16 threads concern European/War history in the history forum 5.6%
16 threads concerning humour in the Freethoughts forum 5.6%
15 threads concerning economics in the business and economics forum 5.2%
1 thread in the General Sciece
2 threads in the Human Sciences
1 Thread in the General Philosophy
TOTAL 287 Threads I have created
78% of my posting history on Sciforums concern non-Jewish and non-Israeli topics . This hardly qualifies for an accusation of an obsession with Jews .
A glance at a thread serach of my threads will show that my threads do indeed generate discussion by the amount of posting traffic a thread I created some days ago has generate almost 400 replies of debate . None of my posts are cut and paste newsarticles all are constructed by my own thinking and are authored with my own words . This is to my credit and as other posters here can verify I do argue on all other posts .James R said:
As for Kiwi123 he has everyright to post on sciforums as he is a resident Israel he adds to the debate I have no problem with him .James R said:
There's little point in me arguing with you, Brian. As for Kiwi, he hasn't even bothered to post in this thread.
The poll results are evenly balanced. So, my decision at the current time is to allow you both to continue posting here.
However, with approximately 50% of people who cared enough to respond to this thread being in favour of your banning, I hope this prompts you to think about the style and content of your posts.
Also, note that this result is not an endorsement of you by the members. Nor does it give you some kind of special licence to break the site rules regarding posting in the future.
The poll results are evenly balanced. So, my decision at the current time is to allow you both to continue posting here.
However, with approximately 50% of people who cared enough to respond to this thread being in favour of your banning, I hope this prompts you to think about the style and content of your posts.
Also, note that this result is not an endorsement of you by the members. Nor does it give you some kind of special licence to break the site rules regarding posting in the future.
Im not arguing with you , I dont want to either , I put my defence up for the other sciforum posters to see . I proved to them your accusations were utterly baseless , thats all that matters to me .James R said:
And on behalf of me and kiwi123 , who due to religious commitments was unable to attend , I thank you so much .James R said:
50% , lets look at it in a more honest perspective James , 11 posters on sciforums voted to have me banned with 5 others not caring either way . sciforums with how many active members ? This poll should of been closed due to lack of member interest , your thread was a disaster , it was ignored .James R said:
Good now that is out of the way , you can now concentrate your energies on that certain poster we talked about who is harassing me , again , and is now beginning a campaign of harassment against Buffalo , look into it , Im not joking this guy is a nut .James R said:
i didnt know that i wasnt allowed to respond to you, foley. i guess your unprovoked ad hom attacks on me when i make a post counts as me harrassing?
pay attention to what james has said. he is a smart guy.
pay attention to what james has said. he is a smart guy.
Im sorry to remind you but you voluntarily put me on your ignore list .The Devil Inside said:
And after your greener pastures farewell , you have come backThe Devil Inside said:
and you gone right back to harassing me again .No this is another LIE , after returning to sciforums you fell back into your old stalking pattern of following everyone of my posts , hoping for an excuse to make a complaint .The Devil Inside said:
I ignored you and didnt bother answering any of your posts to me until this threat was issued . I have not provoked you any manner nor have I offered any ad hom attack on you .The Devil Inside said:
I think it is wise to inform JamesR that you have begun a campaign of harassment similar to the campaign you prosecuted against me towards Buffalo Roam :
The Devil Inside said:
You , your whole attention is fixated on personalities , and you carry your grudges off with you when you leave sciforums , you seriously need some form of psychiatric attention .The Devil Inside said:
Where I differ from you is when I turn on my computer and log into sciforums you all come to life , and I do my 2.76 posts and leave , and when I am finished I log out of sciforums and you all disappear . I get banned I get banned its as simple as that , I come here do my standard 2.76 posts per day .
What a fucking cry baby.
Jesus , amazing an actual supporter of the Devil inside , sciforums ought to have him stuffed .SkinWalker said:
That you commit the logical fallacy of assuming that because I accuse you of being a fucking crybaby implies that I support another member is testament to your overall ignorance.
I don't know devil inside. But you're a fucking crybaby.
I don't know devil inside. But you're a fucking crybaby.
And I have no idea who you are , so I did a thread search on you , and I can say thank God he doesnt know you .SkinWalker said:
I came across this thread you authored , yeah , really illuminating .SkinWalker said:
A 40 year old men and UFO's , any photos of Sasquatch ?
- Status