do not use "we" when you alone decide to embark on a particular course of action as if you have the backing of the staff. it is dishonest and yes when bebelina open a thread in sf asking why her thread was locked, logic demands that you answer in the same thread. you instead go to the locked thread and make a post giving reasons bumping it in the process. a post that has been subsequently removed because apparently some here feel it inappropriate as well.
Wrong:
This message has been deleted by James R. Reason: irrelevant since the offending posts have been deleted
Deleted because it is no longer relevant... maybe my idea of "inappropriate" is different from yours, but the post is irrelevant, not inappropriate. Also, I was not the one to initially lock the thread, so you would do well to get your facts straight.
first "i" then "we"? take responsibility for your own idiotic actions instead of attempting to tar your colleagues
As stated above - I added the post to explain why it was locked. It was decided by the moderation team to leave it locked while other matters were discussed (thus, we). Again, it would serve you well to get your facts straight.
stop lying. the timeline easily establishes the sequence of events. that thread was sans your explanation until a query was made with regards to its status in new thread in sf
And I wasn't even aware of the query in a new thread at the time - you ARE aware that there is a moderators-only forum in which moderation/administration staff can discuss things, correct? And that sometimes discussions there result in changes to things you can see... or are you so blinded by your personal agenda that you think your view on things is the only possibility? However, if you MUST have proof, I will ask the other moderators if I may screenshot the discussion in the moderators forum to show you.
You are acting like, well, an irate pre-teen... instead of stopping and thinking for a moment about what is going on, you are charging headlong into a fight that, honestly, doesn't even need to exist. Just like a hormone-charged pre-teen who thinks someone insulted him.
man up and admit your mistake
My only "mistake" there was bothering to reply to your private message... oh, and thinking I was the only one that received it - I wasn't aware it was sent to others when I replied. That and letting you get under my skin, but that's another thing entirely :shrug:
bite me. you warn me for alleged illogic? that i have a different account of events? whats next, a ban?
No, the warning is just for being an incredible arse - I wouldn't ban someone for that alone.
i am warning you. stick to moderating your forum. you lack the brains to do anything else
Heh, whatever you say Gustav... whatever you say.
Oh, and by the way - good show dragging something you started via private messages into public view... seems to be your standard modus operandi if I'm not mistaken.
For the record though, I do apologize to all if my note in that thread was unclear. I will endeavor to make sure I am more succinct in the future.
