DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Ah OK. The two thoughts kind of got mashed together.
I was stating that losing fat, on average, is mainly about burning more calories
Yea, exactly. “Counting calories” alone isn’t the sum total of fitness, but it is strongly advisable if one is interested in losing, gaining or maintaining weight.i follow this idea strictly 24/7
have done for the last 7 or soo years.
people say dont count calories
but thats only if you cant identify what is quality food and what is calorie burning or have a very distinct eating disorder or serious disease or recovering from an operation where you have lost weight from being sick and in hospital.
You think diabetics don't have the same daily struggle as anybody else? Diabetes can happen to people who love food, take comfort in food, cook and appreciate food. Only they can't go cold turkey, like smokers and alcoholics. You can't simply quit food. You can't even yo-yo diet.not if your diabetic
then chocolate syrup is fatal lol
i have been doing a bit of readingDiabetes
Acta Physiol Hung. 2011 Jun;98(2):177-88. doi: 10.1556/APhysiol.98.2011.2.9.
Monosodium glutamate versus diet induced obesity in pregnant rats and their offspring.
Afifi MM1, Abbas AM.
Author information
1
Department of Biochemistry, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
We aim at determining the role of monosodium glutamate (MSG) compared with high caloric chow(HCC) in development of obesity in pregnant rats and their offspring.
METHODS:
Ninety pregnant rats were divided into 3 groups, control, MSG and HCC fed. We determined energy intake, body weight (BW), abdominal fat, fat to body weight ratio, serum glucose, insulin, leptin, lipid profile, ob and leptin receptor-b gene expressions in pregnant rats and ob and leptin receptor-b gene expressions, serum insulin,glucose, leptin, triacylglycerides (TAG), total lipids (TL) and BW in offspring.
RESULTS:
Although daily energy intake and BW of MSG treated rats were lower than those of HCC fed rats, their abdominal fat and fat body weight ratio were higher. MSG or HCC increased Ob gene expression, leptin, insulin,LDL, cholesterol, total lipids (TL), glucose and decreased leptin receptor-b gene expression. In offspring of MSG treated rats, BW, serum glucose, insulin, leptin, TAG, TL and Ob gene expression increased and leptin receptor-b gene expression decreased whereas in offspring of HCC fed rats, serum insulin, leptin, Ob and leptin receptor-b gene expression increased but serum glucose, TAG, TL or BW did not change.
CONCLUSION:
We conclude that in pregnant rats, MSG, in spite of mild hypophagia, caused severe increase in fat body weight ratio, via leptin resistance, whereas, HCC increased BW and fat body weight ratio, due to hyperphagia with consequent leptin resistance. Moreover, maternal obesity in pregnancy, caused by MSG, has greater impact on offspring metabolism and BW than that induced by HCC.
PMID:
21616776
DOI:
10.1556/APhysiol.98.2011.2.9
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
In this form, yes. But there has been controversy for decades: lots of negative press, so thatyou heard it here first
There is just too much stuff in there you can't control that can control you.It's completely impossible on commercial processed foods - which is what brought on the Type II epidemic in the first place.
I am a Type III Diabetic.You think diabetics don't have the same daily struggle as anybody else?
Better order it soon; they need six months notice.I'll have something like that engraved on my tombstone.
Unfortunately not an option I can implement.It might be cost-effective to make the term 'keto' a banned topic of conversation on SciFo, and then make a script that finds any mention of the word and simply delete the thread.
![]()
Unfortunately not an option I can implement.
What I am doing is gradually banning the IP address ranges that this spam is coming from. It all originates from India - New Delhi to be precise. The ISPs there seem to have huge ranges of IP addresses available, presumably to cater for a very large number of internet users. The problem is that the spammers take advantage of that and use lots of more-or-less random IPs. The problem with banning ranges of addresses that are too large is that we risk cutting off access to the forum from legitimate Indian users. Not that we have many of those, as far as I am aware.