Jesus is back

foghorn said:
But, you can’t prove it’s not, that is, it’s possible right???
Remember Jesus is now a god backed spirit.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure I need to prove anything.

My question was: isn't this fraud? Claiming to be someone you're not for the purpose of manipulating others. I guess it depends on how fraud is interpreted and prosecuted.

"It was God who was at the wheel when the car ran over that little old lady" is not a valid defense. At best, it would put the defendant in the position of having to prove the car was operated by God.

We know the chatbot is a computer-based program - something that can be proven with sufficient investigation. And those servers are owned by some corporation.

I think the onus would be on the corporation to prove it's Jesus.

In 'Murica, you can sue anyone (presumably, this can transcend international borders). They would be on-the-spot proving they are not acting fraudulently.
 
Dave
Have you seen evidence a god created the universe?
It is possible right??

That god was also at the wheel of the car that run the little lady over, then vanished.
It’s possible right??

Jesus most probably will not be seen driving a car or doing other earthly human things.

By Jesus bot, Jesus again just ‘speaks’, it’s a new one for the list of his miracles, you know things humans can’t do.

It’s customarily to look down on folks who say a god or Jesus talks to them.
 
I get your point. I dont see it as addressing anything I've said.

It "possible" God took the wheel of my car and mowed down that little old lady. But thats not a legal defense. No jury will buy that God or Jesus inhabited a machine.

It follows then that someone could sue the owners of that chabot for fraud, and they would be on the hook to prove they are NOT misrepresenting themselves.
 
Blessed are the cheesemakers.

Well, obviously, this is not meant to be taken literally; it refers to any manufacturers of dairy products.
 
DaveC426913 said:
I get your point. I dont see it as addressing anything I've said.
It "possible" God took the wheel of my car and mowed down that little old lady. But thats not a legal defense. No jury will buy that God or Jesus inhabited a machine.
It follows then that someone could sue the owners of that chabot for fraud, and they would be on the hook to prove they are NOT misrepresenting themselves.
Click to expand...
my bold
That just means, the god believing jurists in the jury, are putting a limit on their own god’s powers.
Yet, those same jurists are still willing to believe, without evidence, their god created a universe and the miracles of Jesus.

Ask those god believing jurists to prove a god or Jesus can’t drive a car, or prove a god or Jesus cannot speak via a god bot.
What’s new about the contradictory ways of the ardent believer?

Some ancient authors write about some events, before their own times, those writings get put into book form, and two thousand years later people are believing those authors writings as literal.
Of course, It’s all possible.
 
Last edited:
TheVat said:
Blessed are the cheesemakers.
Well, obviously, this is not meant to be taken literally; it refers to any manufacturers of dairy products.
Click to expand...
Cheesemakers are cheesemakers, gods are gods and can do a little more than make cheese.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top