Sderot is Arab lands?
The classic "land" argument. Can we please move away from this? Land belongs to no one. It belongs to Earth.
Israeli air strike on Syria
- Thread starter S.A.M.
- Start date
The classic "land" argument. Can we please move away from this? Land belongs to no one. It belongs to Earth.
Sderot is Arab lands?
Read the whole thread Geoff:bugeye:
Syria is:
- harboring and supportin the leadership of Hamas
- a conduit point of weapons & cash to Hizballah
- stockpiling Iranian weapons which are aimed at Israeli population centers
- according to this new report is building nuke installations that the North Koreans are selling & building for them
Israel has done what it's done for one or a combination of the following reasons:
- take out the long-range Iranian missiles aimed at Israeli towns
- take out the nuke facilities being built by the North Koreans (why else has NK's regime responded? they have never done that before... maybe one of their engineers has been killed in the strike)
- testing a flight corridor towards Iran if the time comes to bomb their nuke reactors
EDIT:
another reason is to test the capabilities of the advanced new Russian anti-air-craft systems that Putin so kindly sold to Syria
You have inside information?
A link perhaps? Some evidence?
Why is it that all the attacks are INITIATED by Israel?
If it was an attack, I think it is interesting Syria said nothing about the attack or the damage.
Hamas and Hesbollah are resistance factions, which I am glad that Syria is supporting. We have the right to own weapons if the Israelis do
Israel is:
-aiming at Arab civilian population centers
-supporting and flexing terrorism
- murdering innocent people
-developing weapons*
* see how stupid that sounds?
But you said it was only the Israelis attacking things. "All the attacks are carried out by Israel", you said.
They have nuclear weapons; they are illegally occupying another people since 40 years.
Frankly until they stop their occupation AND make restitution, they have no right to complain about what their prisoners do in self defense or to free themselves.
It would be like holding the holocaust victims accountable for wanting to put the Nazis on trial.
Does that include hiding behind them, or firing off a few rounds/rockets like Hezbollah did, then ducking into civilian domiciles before the Israelis can get to you with airstrikes?
Using civilians as shields/cover IMO is just the same as killing them.
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
What do you think of Israel attacking a country for capturing two soldiers close to their border? The two soldiers are alive and well while everyone knows what has happened in Lebanon. What do you also think of the fact that if not for the Hezbollah, Israel would still be illegally occupying Lebanon (which it did for 18 years) and that it was Israel who initiated military strikes in both instances as now in Syria?
So its acceptable for Hezbollah to throw a million cluster bombs in Israel and refuse to give the locations, so that innocent children and civilians fall victim to them? Destroy hospitals and bridges, displace a million plus people, kill a thousand more? After all, if the Hezbollah have two soldiers, Israel has a thousand plus people including children in captivity.
http://www.palestinemonitor.org/spip/spip.php?article9
In case you want a source from Israel:
http://www.hamoked.org/
http://www.btselem.org/English/Beating_and_Abuse/
Another source, the article written by Justin Podur
http://fromoccupiedpalestine.org/node/1122
A "preemptive" attack by Israel is a joke in the light of these continued, unchecked and ongoing atrocities.
Last edited:
What do YOU think about Hezbollah's stubborn refusal to return those soldiers.
What do I think? I don't care. Even though I'm not very religious, Israel doesn't belong to the Arabs. It belonged to the Jews before the Arabs took it and it was rightfully given back to them in the 1940s. You can cry foul all you want, Israel is in the hands of the rightful owners.
If Israel found that Syria is supplying Hezbollah (who initiated the rocket strikes last year, or were you in a coma during those three weeks?), then more power to them.
Hezbollah started that shit last year. What part of that do you not understand? Is it the "Hezbollah" part or the "started that shit" part? Help me understand why the blatantly obvious seems to escape your NARROW perception. Please!
let the demagoguery begin...
if Syria and all that crap you said are morally justified, how come Hamas and Syria are isolated, even by the Arab League? the only countries aligned with them are North Korea and Iran. the former is a hermit kingdom which is the most isolated country on earth, and the latter is being increasingly isolated with increasing sanctions by the Security Council, and is facing a very real possibility of bombing which would be sanctioned (publically and privately) by the entire world -- especially the Gulf countries.
in other words - when you have so little supporters, and the ones you have are fanatics that no one wants to be friends with, your claim of righteousness sort of falls flat.
now i won't get into the details about the larger conflict and philosophy and all that, bc this thread will go to hell, and is largely irrelevant. what is relevant, is that Syria has been responsible, directly and indirectly, for attacks on Israel, for decades. and if the Israeli gov't sent planes to destroy threats, then it was necessary. i assure you, no pizzerias or bus stations were blown up, and no toddlers were sniped in the process.
if Syria and all that crap you said are morally justified, how come Hamas and Syria are isolated, even by the Arab League? the only countries aligned with them are North Korea and Iran. the former is a hermit kingdom which is the most isolated country on earth, and the latter is being increasingly isolated with increasing sanctions by the Security Council, and is facing a very real possibility of bombing which would be sanctioned (publically and privately) by the entire world -- especially the Gulf countries.
in other words - when you have so little supporters, and the ones you have are fanatics that no one wants to be friends with, your claim of righteousness sort of falls flat.
now i won't get into the details about the larger conflict and philosophy and all that, bc this thread will go to hell, and is largely irrelevant. what is relevant, is that Syria has been responsible, directly and indirectly, for attacks on Israel, for decades. and if the Israeli gov't sent planes to destroy threats, then it was necessary. i assure you, no pizzerias or bus stations were blown up, and no toddlers were sniped in the process.
Not to mention secret prisons without oversight or accountability
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/...&subContrassID=14&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
What a crock of shit.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/...&subContrassID=14&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y
What a crock of shit.
Like the Jews who were sent back to Germany from the UK and US during the Nazi atrocities.
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose
Secret detention camps holding people including children without evidence, disproportionate and violent retribution, torture, detention of mothers and their children, children imprisoned along with adults, severe occupation, separation wall, checkpoints, starvation, people dying at checkpoints for lack of medical care, sonic booms, daily military insurgencies.....
You'd have to be pretty much in denial anyway to think this is right. Ideological fantasies are not a prerogative of Germans who think they are justified in protecting their pure race any which way. Even if it means demonising the people they are intent on wiping out.
You'd have to be pretty much in denial anyway to think this is right. Ideological fantasies are not a prerogative of Germans who think they are justified in protecting their pure race any which way. Even if it means demonising the people they are intent on wiping out.
Rofl. Stereotype more, please.