Is this real maths or somebody winding me up?

amber said:
I have quoted the above, an empty matrix has 0 dimensions , every element is 0 in the empty matrix.
Click to expand...
Do you understand that the page you linked, from mathworks, is talking about a data type?
Do you know what MATLAB is? Do you understand anything else on the page you linked, or you just saw "empty matrix" and thought "aha!"
I believe I have the answer to gravity mechanism, are you as scientists really going to just ignore this because I am not as well educated as you?
Click to expand...
Congratulations for having the answer. If you can't explain your answer though, that's your tough luck (life's like that).
In the mean time does anyone know how to transpose a=[] t0 a=[n] in a split second, in maths terms?
Click to expand...
You've asked this question or one very like it a few times now.
I don't think anyone understands the question, I know I don't.
 
DaveC426913 said:
No it doesn't.

Go back and read post 153.
The OP is replying to origin, claiming origin thinks he's smarter.
My comment simply corrected that: origin is not (necessarily) smarter, merely more informed.
Click to expand...
Got it but hope you understand my confusion

Anyway I would contend if we had a brain damage ant it could be considered smarter than orange tree sap

Even if it was trapped inside it

Cheers

:)
 
arfa brane said:
Do you understand that the page you linked, from mathworks, is talking about a data type?
Do you know what MATLAB is? Do you understand anything else on the page you linked, or you just saw "empty matrix" and thought "aha!"
Congratulations for having the answer. If you can't explain your answer though, that's your tough luck (life's like that).
You've asked this question or one very like it a few times now.
I don't think anyone understands the question, I know I don't.
Click to expand...
I think Matlab would be computer programming software. I understood bits of the page. Isn't a Matrix a matrix in any description?


In the mean time does anyone know how to transpose a=[] t0 a=[n] in a split second, in maths terms?
Click to expand...


How can nobody understand the question, it is in English and is not difficult to understand?



does anyone know how to?


In maths form?


Know how to explain?

An empty Matrix?

Expanding at c?

To become a n-dimensional Matrix?


f(x) = nx? .

The individual items in an m × n matrix A, often denoted by ai,j, where max i = m and max j = n,
Click to expand...


n * n matrix?
min i=0

min j = 0

max i=n

max j=n

an,n ?

(n*n) c³?


n=nc²?

0³=n³?


n*n+1=0³= 1

0*0+1=0³=1

Based on >0=1

A 0 point adjoined to a 0 point = 1x

By stating 0 + 0 , we are stating there is two 0 points



I will keep practising until you say yes that looks correct. Then I know I am doing right.
 
Last edited:
I think this one is pretty close to being correct in explaining

The individual items in an m × n matrix A

Δ i * j = ΔE where E is energy and i and j are vectors?

But I would have to put n × n matrix A ?

I am using this link and your explanation thus far to try and do the maths required.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_(mathematics)

ƒ:i,j=n?

I also think this map is now correct?
 
Last edited:
DaveC426913 said:
And then ... you will ... teach us the secret of gravity.

That's the 2-step plan, is it?
Click to expand...
Well gravity is simple

N→←N

Which is neutral is attracted to neutral, neutral is ostensible.


N1→←N2

It is not a secret, it is elementary and based on present information.

(a.b)→←(a.b)

(a.b)←→(a.b)


a.b being the dot product of two merged matrices.
 
Last edited:
This painful to watch.

And that's generously assuming you're not just "winding us up".

:unsubscribe:
 
Last edited:
→
E (A) = negative polarity

→
E (B) = positive polarity

A.B = dot product

(a.b)→←(a.b)

(a.b)←→(a.b)

Abstract:

ƒ: x=(a→←b) = ƒ:R³=ƒ:xyz=ƒ:(a.b)=ƒ:(a.b)→←(a.b)=ƒ:(a.b)←→(a.b) = gravity
 
Last edited:
amber said:
I have explained it in simplicity and your failure to understand is not my failure to explain.
Click to expand...
Like a catatonic schizophrenic might "explain" their dreams, and blame others for not "understanding".

Your failure is that you are - in the words of Wolfgang Pauli — "Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!" — "That is not only not right, it is not even wrong!") t
 
DaveC426913 said:
Like a catatonic schizophrenic might "explain" their dreams, and blame others for not "understanding".

Your failure is that you are - in the words of Wolfgang Pauli — "Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!" — "That is not only not right, it is not even wrong!") t
Click to expand...
Well ! when I have learnt the correct maths, you may just eat your words. Why not look at my gravity equation and try to read it if you don't understand, try even asking questions about it , that is what we call a discussion.
 
Matrix A = []

Matrix B = []

A + B = [a.b]

0+0=1


Defining polarity as a 0 point space of attraction or repulsion.
 
Try adding a thousand more monkeys with a thousand more typewriters.


BTW, what's the PVC (Personal Victory Condition) here?
Are you going for maximum post count (how long you can keep people responding in a single thread) or is it number of distinct members that get involved? It's usually one or the other.
 
Last edited:
DaveC426913 said:
Try adding a thousand more monkeys with a thousand more typewriters.


BTW, what's the PVC (Personal Victory Condition) here?
Are you going for maximum post count (how long you can keep people responding in a single thread) or is it number of distinct members that get involved? It's usually one or the other.
Click to expand...
My personal victory would be a page on Wiki in my own name.
 
Mod Hat — Xfer

So, lots of notes coming in about this thread. We'll go ahead and move this over to Alternative Theories.

Meanwhile, just to consider a particular aspect:

DaveC426913 said:
BTW, what's the PVC (Personal Victory Condition) here?
Are you going for maximum post count (how long you can keep people responding in a single thread) or is it number of distinct members that get involved? It's usually one or the other.
Click to expand...

Well, yeah, okay. But still, something about the way this point of inquiry functions seems recursive self-inflicted curiously ... er ... yeah. Something about nine pages in.

Nor would I actually complain about the point; it's just, yeah, if one is asking the question nine pages in, what, precisely is the question about how the thread ran nine pages?

There is also this:

arfa brane said:
Do you understand anything else on the page you linked, or you just saw "empty matrix" and thought "aha!"
Click to expand...

In truth, I just need to remember this point for some future occasion; it's a personal thing, as it perfectly encapsulates something I was trying to make clear to someone once upon a time in another discussion about a different subject.
 
Tiassa said:
Well, yeah, okay. But still, something about the way this point of inquiry functions seems recursive self-inflicted curiously ... er ... yeah. Something about nine pages in.
Click to expand...
For my part, I started off trying to help. Even ignoring whether or not he was not a sock (and it costs me nothing to proceed as if he is not) - as long as he's asking sincere questions, I'm happy to answer. After all, he's not the only reader.
One should have a certain amount of patience to draw an ostensibly inquisitive type back to asking rather than telling.
I guess nine pages is the limit of my patience.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top