DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
You wouldn't.How would I describe at?
example : Δu=(+1)-(+1) at c ~1/a
c ~ 1/a is a continuum, infinitely long, so "at" doesn't make sense.
You could say when.
You wouldn't.How would I describe at?
example : Δu=(+1)-(+1) at c ~1/a
I am trying to explain a burst of energy/flash of light , I would of thought the energy/light would travel at c ?You wouldn't.
c ~ 1/a is a continuum, infinitely long, so "at" doesn't make sense.
You could say when.
You've got the cart before the horse.I am trying to explain a burst of energy/flash of light , I would of thought the energy/light would travel at c ?
Appear then in a split second vanish at c.
Well if I can learn the math for this particular matrix, then I may be able learn lots more. I understand I get to the end without a beginning or a middle and you are correct , I need to learn more. Every time I get an answer, I learn more. I have learnt quite a bit in the last few days, as with my example you can see I am learning. I even understand , in example : [-2,4] they are coordinates .You've got the cart before the horse.
Don't try to do it with math if you haven't learned the math.
Then please help me.Indeed not.
No, Theorist, it would be worse than teaching chemistry to river. (I tried it once.)Then please help me.
is [0,0,0] dead centre? Using a matrix coordinate system.
This theorist you keep mentioning does not exist. Please help me learn some of this particular math.No, Theorist, it would be worse than teaching chemistry to river. (I tried it once.)
You cannot jump into matrix math without any knowledge to build from and hope to understand what is going on.Then please help me.
is [0,0,0] dead centre? Using a matrix coordinate system.
Thank you very much origin, you will not regret learning me.You cannot jump into matrix math without any knowledge to build from and hope to understand what is going on.
There is no such thing as a matrix coordinate system.
If your matrix is describing a Cartesian coordinate system then (0,0,0) is the origin.
Let's cut to the chase then, are you the same person as theorist-constant12345This theorist you keep mentioning does not exist. Please help me learn some of this particular math.
Oh for crying out loud, NO.And is this calculus?
I doubt that...Thank you very much origin, you will not regret learning me.
Look up Cartesian coordinate on google, it is very clear.What do ''we'' mean by Cartesian?
Would Cartesian be our present use or classical use?
Am I the same person as a character , a performance artist, an alias on a forum?Let's cut to the chase then, are you the same person as theorist-constant12345
Oh for crying out loud, NO.
I doubt that...
You don't learn someone, you teach someone.
Look up Cartesian coordinate on google, it is very clear.
You don't learn someone, you teach someone.
To clarify my understanding, if we used a Cartesian coordinate system and defined the matrix to be a 8*8*8 , we could have a really good game of 3d chess? Using the system to make our moves of the pieces.I think you have a bottomless well whatifer
I don't do mathematics in any size / shape / form and the closest I have come to Cartesian is reading the odd headline about KardashianTo clarify my understanding, if we used a Cartesian coordinate system and defined the matrix to be a 8*8*8 , we could have a really good game of 3d chess? Using the system to make our moves of the pieces.
Lol, thank you for replying. I think the Cartesian coordinate system is easy enough to understand, it is basically just different points inside of a box. It seemingly gives the dead centre of the box a 0 position value (the observer) , then minus and plus vector values ''expand'' from this point.I don't do mathematics in any size / shape / form and the closest I have come to Cartesian is reading the odd headline about Kardashian
But imI guessing they are not the same