Is there zero connection between String Theory and the paranormal?

Does String Theory help to explain... but not necessarily debunk some aspects of the paranormal?

  • No

    Votes: 2 66.7%
  • Yes

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • Maybe?????

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3
Namely our whole interaction in: http://sciforums.com/threads/are-we-made-in-gods-image.163113/
Where I tried to educate you that something you called merely a microtubule was in fact an organism, and even according to a video you cited.
I am sorry to say that you are wholly uninformed and completely wrong in your understanding of microtubules. Everyone who has even paid cursory attention to my posts knows that microtubules are not organisms but organelles that make up the heart of neural axons in the entire neural network, in addition to a host of other functional processes of data transfer, such as mitosis, and the cellular cytoskeleton including muscle movement, and cilia found in you lungs, respiratory tract and middle ear and of course the flagella that allows your sperm to swim a long way towards the egg for fertilization.

To save you further embarrasement, I'll let you do your own research, unless you wish to remain ignorant on that important subject. You know the sub-forum where to find the info.

If you had engaged me nicely, I would have been happy to provide you with anything you wanted to know about microtubules.
The paranormal? Yes. I'm a paranormal atheist. Show me actual evidence and I'll consider believing it.
Apparently you have not understood that I also do not believe in paranormal phenomena. I believe all observable and unobservable phenomena are natural phenomena. I just try to be more diplomatic in my answers to serious inquirers.
Where have you been all this time?
I completely agree. There is no productivity to be found interacting with a person who lacks the necessary wherewithal. Hence my past wasted efforts with you.
Again I beg to differ. There is at least one part we engaged in and I was able to correct your utter misunderstanding of microtubules. For that alone I consider this a productive exchange......... :cool:
 
Last edited:
I am sorry to say that you are wholly uninformed and completely wrong in your understanding of microtubules. Everyone who has even paid cursory attention to my posts knows that microtubules are not organisms but organelles that make up the heart of neural axons in the entire neural network, in addition to a host of other functional processes of data transfer, such as mitosis, and the cellular cytoskeleton including muscle movement, and cilia found in you lungs, respiratory tract and middle ear and of course the flagella that allows your sperm to swim a long way towards the egg for fertilization.

To save you further embarrasement, I'll let you do your own research, unless you wish to remain ignorant on that important subject. You know the sub-forum where to find the info.

If you had engaged me nicely, I would have been happy to provide you with anything you wanted to know about microtubules.
I didn't say microtubules were organisms. I said you confused an organism for a microtubule. See, you can't even follow simple sentences.

Where have you been all this time?
Bored of people like you.

Again I beg to differ. There is at least one part we engaged in and I was able to correct your utter misunderstanding of microtubules. For that alone I consider this a productive exchange.........
Only in your head. I guess that's enough for you.


Since you're likely too lazy to go look, here's where you claimed an organism was a microtubule: http://sciforums.com/threads/are-we-made-in-gods-image.163113/page-18#post-3640400

And no doubt you'll claim it again, proving you can't be taught, even with your own sources.
 
Last edited:
is Dennis on holiday ?
I am sorry to say that you are wholly uninformed and completely wrong in your understanding of microtubules.

FYI this subject would be better credited to keep inside your thread on the subject to avoid trollers trolling it

i have watched electron microscope video of what your thread is about
its F_cking AMAZING

and kinda blew my mind

like a child walking in to see a big top circus in full show performance for the first time

i suggest you may be wasting your time bothering to reply to some people and in other threads
 
I didn't say microtubules were organisms. I said you confused an organism for a microtubule. See, you can't even follow simple sentences.
Oh man, you are so far out in left field this is becoming hilarious. You are your own victim of an overly aggressive imagination. I never claimed microtubules are are alive. I was falsely accused of that by other posters in ill-considered jest.

Those other posters, you know who you are!

97 pages of microtubule descriptions and their functions and not one of them advances the idea that microtubules are alive or conscious. And then comes Vociferous and is going to set things straight once and for all time.

Stop digging yourself deeper into an already deep hole .
 
Last edited:
Back in the 1990's I read an article in an encyclopaedia on science that had a photo of Stephen Hawking Ph. D. at the beginning of the article and I was given the impression that he collaborated with the author of the article or perhaps even wrote most of it himself.

Several paragraphs jumped out at me on String Theory that reminded me of what I was hearing from near death experiencers about what they saw during their out of the body experience.



Basic String Theory, to my thinking, hints at a very different origin for intelligence than the traditional Darwinian model of Evolution postulated.

In my opinion.... a true "Theory of Everything" will offer a logical explanation for certain types of paranormal phenomena that does not exactly discredit them.​
''Paranormal activity'' can't be proven by using repeatable experiments. We can't ''recreate'' the conditions that would be necessary to prove paranormal activity firstly, let alone that it would have any connection to String Theory. How might you test your ''opinion?'' (Sorry if this has been asked, I didn't scroll through the entire thread.)
 
Oh man, you are so far out in left field this is becoming hilarious. You are your own victim of an overly aggressive imagination. I never claimed microtubules are are alive. I was falsely accused of that by other posters in ill-considered jest.

Those other posters, you know who you are!

97 pages of microtubule descriptions and their functions and not one of them advances the idea that microtubules are alive or conscious. And then comes Vociferous and is going to set things straight once and for all time.

Stop digging yourself deeper into an already deep hole .

Again, learn how to read simple English. I never said you claimed microtubules are alive. I said you conflated them with a living organism, here:
E nucleofilum is not an organisms but a microtubule?
E nucleofilum is an organism. But thanks for once again proving you're incapable of learning fairly simple science.

And you must realize that, otherwise you wouldn't feel the need for all the defensive posturing.
 
Last edited:
Again, learn how to read simple English. I never said you claimed microtubules are alive. I said you conflated them with a living organism, here:
write4u said; E nucleofilum is not an organisms but a microtubule?
Vociferous said; E nucleofilum is an organism.
But thanks for once again proving you're incapable of learning fairly simple science.
Deeper and deeper we go into the hole. Do you understand the meaning of this symbol "?" at the end of a sentence?
The question mark ? (also known as interrogation point, query, or eroteme in journalism) is a punctuation mark that indicates an interrogative clause or phrase in many languages.
Perhaps it is you who needs to learn some English.
Enough of this drivel. You are becoming boring.
 
Last edited:
''Paranormal activity'' can't be proven by using repeatable experiments. We can't ''recreate'' the conditions that would be necessary to prove paranormal activity firstly, let alone that it would have any connection to String Theory. How might you test your ''opinion?'' (Sorry if this has been asked, I didn't scroll through the entire thread.)

On the other hand the word "prove" is a rather strong term and the phrase "offer evidence for" allows for a much less strict set of expectations.
 
is Dennis on holiday ?


FYI this subject would be better credited to keep inside your thread on the subject to avoid trollers trolling it

i have watched electron microscope video of what your thread is about
its F_cking AMAZING

and kinda blew my mind

like a child walking in to see a big top circus in full show performance for the first time

i suggest you may be wasting your time bothering to reply to some people and in other threads


Yes..... there are days and even weeks when it is nearly impossible for me to spend any serious amount of time online on discussion forums ......
(one of those time periods is when I am setting up another possible campaign for public office here in Canada)??????

For the record....I personally love it when a discussion goes off in a direction that some posters might discern as "thread hijacking"...... it is nearly impossible to give me the impression that somebody who is passionate about a somewhat related topic has hijacked any discussion that I began.

(I am at work at the moment so I am technically am not supposed to be here for more than fifteen minutes...... but at least I can show up and toss in a quick reply or two or three)!

In my opinion... the ability to be AMAZED... is a sign of truly understanding and comprehending the universe / multiverse that we are privileged to be alive within!

Dr. Albert Einstein made statements about IMAGINATION that proved that he had an awesome grasp of living life in a state of continual amazement and curiosity!
 
So you admit that E nucleofilum is an organism?


Yes.... I admit it.... E nucleofilum is by definition an "organism"....
but my definition for the word "organism" applies not only here in four dimensional space - time where electromagnetism, gravity, weak and strong nuclear force are separate from each other but........

... has some sort of validity in fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth dimensional space time as well!


 
You could be a defense attorney. ;)

That is certainly one of the nicest things that I was told this week...... Gracias!

Oh... my somewhat similar reply in post number seventy five.... refers back to the quotation from page one post number one.


Yes.... I admit it.... E nucleofilum is by definition an "organism"....
but my definition for the word "organism" applies not only here in four dimensional space - time where electromagnetism, gravity, weak and strong nuclear force are separate from each other but........

... has some sort of validity in fifth, sixth, seventh and eighth dimensional space time as well!


 
Five centuries ago was 1521. Magellan was sailing around the Earth at that time. Everyone thought he would make it back; no one thought he would "fall off the edge." His expedition returned the following year, in 1522, as everyone thought it would.

Where do you get this stuff?

Excellent point... I should have written five point three or five point four centuries.... and linked to the attempts by a number of people to talk Columbus out of on embarking on his expedition!

(I think that it is relevant that in the year 1480 or so it is possible for one Pope with a dogmatic flat earth belief......
to scare aspiring explorers like Colombus if.......
the writings of Colombus or the intellectuals who agreed with him about the earth being round.......
might be arrested)?!


https://www.encyclopedia.com/people...d-conquerors-biographies/christopher-columbus

Born in Genoa, Italy, Columbus began his career as a sailor on merchant and war ships in the Mediterranean. In 1476 he went to Lisbon, Portugal, where he learned mathematics and astronomy (study of the stars), subjects that were vital for navigation. He made several voyages, including one to Iceland (an island between the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans) with other explorers. In the early 1480s Columbus sought a sponsor for his own voyage of exploration. He wanted to prove his theory that China and the East Indies could be reached more easily by sailing west across the Atlantic Ocean than by going around Africa to the Indian Ocean. If he succeeded, he would also confirm a long-held European belief that the world was round. Educated Europeans of the fifteenth century knew the Earth was a sphere, but no one had yet determined its size. Columbus also contended that by taking the Atlantic route, he could make an accurate measurement of the distance between Europe and China.

For several years Columbus had failed in his attempts to enlist the king of Portugal in this quest, primarily because Portuguese explorer Bartolomeu Dias (c.1450–1500) had found the sea passage from Europe to India, which was considered the best route at the time. Not to be discouraged, Columbus decided to try his luck in Spain. He first met with Queen Isabella I (1451–1504) in 1486, but it wasn't until April 1492, that Isabella and her husband, King Ferdinand V (1452–1516) agreed to finance an expedition. As part of the deal, Columbus would be named admiral, become governor of any territory he discovered, and receive a share of any riches he found.

What percentage of Europeans were "educated?"

I submit a very, very, very ,very small percentage of Europeans were "educated" and back in those days it was pretty easy to get fifty or a hundred uneducated people together to organize a burning at the stake...... or something in some ways even worse perhaps .


The following information was not well known for another century or two:

Ecuador
Written byRabbi Marvin TokayerPosted inTribes


Intensified attention to the subject took place in the 17th century in England. It was all due to the writings of Manasseh Ben Israel, an Amsterdam Rabbi, who convinced Oliver Cromwell to allow the Jews to Return to England after their banishment from that country four centuries previously.

Manasseh was fully convinced of the authenticity of the Sambatyon legend. He wrote in his book that all think that the Ten Tribes dwelled beyond this Sabbatical river. He cites many authorities in support of his belief including the statement of Josephus that Titus himself had seen the river. Later on, after his meetings with a remarkable missionary, the Marrano Jew (Jew who was forced to convert to Christianity in Spain and Portugal), Antonio de Montezinus, he became fully convinced that the American Indians constituted some of the Ten Lost Tribes of Israel.

Manasseh heard a very remarkable thing from Montezinus that in 1642 when Montezinus was deep into the mountainous wilderness of Ecuador, he met with four Indians who greeted him with "Shema Israel" which is the traditional creed of Israelites beginning with "Hear, O Israel: The Lord our God, the Lord is one!" (Deuteronomy 6:4). He claimed that he spoke with them in Hebrew and claimed they were from the Lost Tribe of Reuben and Levi.

Through the conversation with Montezinus, Rabbi Manase Ben Israel was convinced that the American Indians were from several tribes of the Lost Tribes of Israel. He wrote on Dec. 23, 1649, in a letter to John Drury, the Puritan divine, "I think the Ten Tribes lived not only there in America, but also in other lands scattered everywhere, these never did come back to the second temple, and they keep to this day still the Jewish religion seeing that all the prophecies which speak of the bringing back into their native soil must be fulfilled."

Menorah Was Found in South America

As for the Indians in South America and the Lost Tribes of Israel, there was an interesting article in a newspaper published in Israel (Maariv, Dec 31, 1974) as follows:

In 1587, a Jesuit Nicholas Delttsu was sent to South America by the king of Spain to convert the Indians. In Argentina, he found a tribe with Hebrew names, Abraham, David, Moshe, etc.. When he asked them if they were circumcised, they answered, "Yes, just as our ancestors." In the same area were found knives of stone used for circumcision. Sharpened stone knives are cited in the Bible as used for circumcision.

Of equal interest is the recent find of a tribe in Argentina related to the Incas of Peru. On a stone tablet were found 3 commandments - "Do not steal." "Do not lie." and "Do not murder." Scholars concluded that these commandments come from the Ten Commandments of Moses but existed hundreds of years before the Spaniards arrived.

And in 1974 in the same area, round stones were found with Hebrew Menorah (candlestick with 7 arms of ancient Israel) on the stone, and on the side is written in Aramaic, Pascha (Passover). Aramaic is an ancient language which ancient Israelites used and this itself means very old.
A few meters away was found a long stone in the shape of a brick with an engraving of a boat (the emblem of Zevulun is ship) with the word Tzipora (the same name as the wife of Moses and one of names of Israelites. The name of the ship?) written on it. Does this mean that they came here on boat? Scholars believe it is 3000 years old.

This article is relevant because not everybody in Europe wanted to prepare a way for an Exodus of Jews from Europe at the time when the Spanish Inquisition on the Jewish people would begin to ramp up to full intensity.
 
Excellent point... I should have written five point three or five point four centuries.... and linked to the attempts by a number of people to talk Columbus out of on embarking on his expedition!
(I think that it is relevant that in the year 1480 or so it is possible for one Pope with a dogmatic flat earth belief.
Plato, 480BC: "My conviction is that the Earth is a round body."
Aristotle in 360BC proved the Earth was round by showing that Southern constellations become more visible as you travel South, and the Earth's shadow on the Moon during a lunar eclipse is round.
Archimedes around 240BC wrote that "The surface of any fluid at rest is the surface of a sphere whose centre is the same as that of the Earth."

So you're off by about 2000 years.
I submit a very, very, very ,very small percentage of Europeans were "educated" and back in those days it was pretty easy to get fifty or a hundred uneducated people together to organize a burning at the stake......
1) "Burnings at the stake" were organized by governments, and thus were commanded by the more educated people of the time - judges and clerics.
2) Today you could get 50 or 100 people in the US to say that the Earth is flat. There are plenty of examples of this. Being able to find 100 people who believe an outlandish thing means next to nothing,
 
Plato, 480BC: "My conviction is that the Earth is a round body."
Aristotle in 360BC proved the Earth was round by showing that Southern constellations become more visible as you travel South, and the Earth's shadow on the Moon during a lunar eclipse is round.
Archimedes around 240BC wrote that "The surface of any fluid at rest is the surface of a sphere whose centre is the same as that of the Earth."

So you're off by about 2000 years.

1) "Burnings at the stake" were organized by governments, and thus were commanded by the more educated people of the time - judges and clerics.
2) Today you could get 50 or 100 people in the US to say that the Earth is flat. There are plenty of examples of this. Being able to find 100 people who believe an outlandish thing means next to nothing,


Good points... thank you for that post ..... but....... were the Jewish people of the decade before Colombus sailed toward the "West Indies" at all worried that the time might come when they might need to make another "Exodus" out of Roman Catholic Europe?

Was Colombus, (a Jew)... somewhat motivated to find a faster route to the "West Indies?"

Was his level of motivation sufficient to overcome what might have been a valid fear of what some people would want to do to him even before he and his crew sailed.
 
Back
Top