Is there zero connection between String Theory and the paranormal?

Does String Theory help to explain... but not necessarily debunk some aspects of the paranormal?

  • No

    Votes: 2 66.7%
  • Yes

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • Maybe?????

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    3

Dennis Tate

Banned
Back in the 1990's I read an article in an encyclopaedia on science that had a photo of Stephen Hawking Ph. D. at the beginning of the article and I was given the impression that he collaborated with the author of the article or perhaps even wrote most of it himself.

Several paragraphs jumped out at me on String Theory that reminded me of what I was hearing from near death experiencers about what they saw during their out of the body experience.

"It was not until 1920 that the idea of linking electromagnetism and
gravity resurfaced. At that time a new theory of gravitation had been proposed by Albert Einstein (1879-1955), called the general theory of relativity. It was a replacement of Newton's theory, which had stood unchallenged since 1687. Inspired by Einstein's work, a young German mathematician named Theodore Kaluza was seized by a curious idea. The theory of relativity links space an time together to form a four-dimensional space-time continuum. What would happen, mused Kaluza, if general relativity were formulated in five rather than four dimensions? This is what Kaluza did, and to everyone's astonishment it was discovered that five-dimensional gravity obeys the same laws as
four-dimensional gravity as well as Maxwell's laws for the electromagnetic field. In other words, gravitation and electromagnetism are automatically unified in five dimensions, where electromagnetism is merely a component of gravity!"


The only drawback of the theory concerns the extra dimension. Why
don't we see it?
An ingenious answer was provided by Oskar Klein. A
hosepipe viewed from afar looks like a wiggly line, i.e. one- dimensional.
However, on closer inspection it can be seen as a narrow tube. It is, in fact,
two-dimensional, and what was taken to be a point on the line is actually a
little circle going around the tube. In the same way, reasoned Klein, what we normally regard as a point in three dimensional space could in reality be a little circle going around a fourth space dimension. Thus Kaluza's extra
dimension might well exist, but be impossible to detect because it is closed
(circular) and rolled up to a very small circumference. In spite of
these bizarre overtones, it seems probable that in future a "theory of everything" will make use of the idea of unseen higher dimensions."
.
...

"Although nature manifests four distinct forces, physicists believe that
each may be part of a smaller number of more primitive forces. At high energy, the electromagnetic and weak forces appear to merge into a single "electroweak" force. Some "grand unified theories" suggest that a further amalgamation takes place between the electroweak and strong forces at as yet unattained energies. The most ambitious unification schemes envisage an amalgamation of all four forces into a single "superforce" at ultra-high levels of energy."...
"The real burden in the next three centuries will not be the development of fancy mathematics, but the experimental testing of these ambitious theories. All current thinking about total unification assumes that the effects of linking all the forces and particles together will only become manifest at energies that are some trillion times greater than those currently attainable in particle accelerators. Probably we shall never reach such energies directly" ( A Theory of Everything" Volume 21 of "The World of Science)



Basic String Theory, to my thinking, hints at a very different origin for intelligence than the traditional Darwinian model of Evolution postulated.

In my opinion.... a true "Theory of Everything" will offer a logical explanation for certain types of paranormal phenomena that does not exactly discredit them.​
 
Chapter thirteen of Stephen Hawking's Universe is entitled The Anthropic Principle. In that chapter he explains an Atheistic or Agnostic version of the Cyclic Model of the Universe but......
strangely enough.... a near death experiencer wrote something very similar on many levels after his brush with death.

https://www.near-death.com/experiences/exceptional/mellen-thomas-benedict.html#a05

I was in pre creation, before the Big Bang. I had crossed over the beginning of time / the First Word / the First vibration. I was in the Eye of Creation. I felt as if I was touching the Face of God. It was not a religious feeling. Simply, I was at one with Absolute Life and Consciousness. When I say that I could see or perceive forever, I mean that I could experience all of creation generating itself. It was without beginning and without end. That’s a mind-expanding thought, isn’t it? Scientists perceive the Big Bang as a single event that created the Universe. I saw during my life after death experience that the Big Bang is only one of an infinite number of Big Bangs creating Universes endlessly and simultaneously. The only images that even come close in human terms would be those created by super computers using fractal geometry equations.

The ancients knew of this. They said God had periodically created new Universes by breathing out, and recreated other Universes by breathing in. These epochs were called Yugas. Modern science called this the Big Bang. I was in absolute, pure consciousness. I could see or perceive all the Big Bangs or Yugas creating and recreating themselves. Instantly I entered into them all simultaneously. I saw that each and every little piece of creation has the power to create. It is very difficult to try to explain this. I am still speechless about this.

It took me years after I returned from my near-death experience to assimilate any words at all for the Void experience. I can tell you this now: the Void is less than nothing, yet more than everything that is! The Void is absolute zero; chaos forming all possibilities. It is Absolute Consciousness; much more than even Universal Intelligence. The Void is the vacuum or nothingness between all physical manifestations. The SPACE between atoms and their components. Modern science has begun to study this space between everything. They call it Zero point. Whenever they try to measure it, their instruments go off the scale, or to infinity, so to speak. They have no way, as of yet, to measure infinity accurately. There is more of the zero space in your own body and the Universe than anything else!

Am I a total idiot to find that this reminds me of the idea of Energy from Quantum Vacuum????
 
Is there any evidence of String Theory in the first place?
Just read up the Reader's Digest version of string theory

My take - I haven't got one

Anyone talking about string theory needs to be standing in front of whatever passes for a 5 metres wide X 2 metres high chalkboard today. Board needs to be covered in exotic symbols and the talk composed of exotic mathematical language

Several paragraphs jumped out at me on String Theory that reminded me of what I was hearing from near death experiencers about what they saw during their out of the body experience.

The above is more akin to the book written by god "How to Create a Human with a Handfull of Mud and no Mathematics"

:)
 
Given that the "paranormal" doesn't exist, then... take a guess as to the answer.
Several paragraphs jumped out at me on String Theory that reminded me of what I was hearing from near death experiencers about what they saw during their out of the body experience.
Confirmation bias.
Am I a total idiot to find that this reminds me of the idea of Energy from Quantum Vacuum????
What it reminds you of is due to your personal experiences/ knowledge. If you're asking if there's a genuine connection then: No, there isn't.
 
Is there any evidence of String Theory in the first place?

If you take the time to wade through the following testimonies I believe that you will be hearing
about what Applied String Theory looks like.

You of course may disagree.

https://www.near-death.com/psychology/triggers.html

 
Just read up the Reader's Digest version of string theory

My take - I haven't got one

Anyone talking about string theory needs to be standing in front of whatever passes for a 5 metres wide X 2 metres high chalkboard today. Board needs to be covered in exotic symbols and the talk composed of exotic mathematical language



The above is more akin to the book written by god "How to Create a Human with a Handfull of Mud and no Mathematics"

:)

I disagree.. I believe that some of the basic implications of String Theory but......
THEY SCARE US!!!!!

So we prefer to not deeply think about what is implied by String Theory.
 
Given that the "paranormal" doesn't exist, then... take a guess as to the answer.

Confirmation bias.

What it reminds you of is due to your personal experiences/ knowledge. If you're asking if there's a genuine connection then: No, there isn't.

Thank you for replying to this topic..... but if you would like to know more....
see the testimonies in post number six.
 
Oh, you contend that claims made without evidence are more than anecdotes?

Your definition of "without evidence" is a choice that you are free to make....
and I can consider evidence very seriously that you may reject....
that is up to you and I.

My impression at this time is that intelligent people fear the implications of String Theory much as gifted people of five centuries ago feared the implications of a round earth.
 
Your definition of "without evidence" is a choice that you are free to make....
So you're saying that you consider anecdotes to be evidence?
My impression at this time is that intelligent people fear the implications of String Theory much as gifted people of five centuries ago feared the implications of a round earth.
Oh dear... the fact that the world is round has been known and accepted for about two and half thousand years so your contention that "gifted people of five centuries ago feared the implications" is in error.
 
So you're saying that you consider anecdotes to be evidence?

Oh dear... the fact that the world is round has been known and accepted for about two and half thousand years so your contention that "gifted people of five centuries ago feared the implications" is in error.

But... the idea of "Invisible higher dimensions operating at higher and higher levels of energy" would still tend to scare people.....
In my opinion, in our own way we are almost as "religious" as the people of five centuries ago would were stuck on belief of a flat earth.
 
Giving permission for some person to do or not to do something over which you have no control is mildly

S T R A N G E
:)

I don't feel that I have to convince anybody to agree with me but.....
there is a segment of the population who have been studying near death experience accounts who are willing to research this and other related phenomena a great deal. When they do this... I do believe that they will end up with a vastly more accurate view of their place in the universe than would somebody who would cling to the simplistic version of Evolutionary theory that I was taught back in elementary school during the '60's.
 
But... the idea of "Invisible higher dimensions operating at higher and higher levels of energy" would still tend to scare people.....
Rubbish.
In my opinion, in our own way we are almost as "religious" as the people of five centuries ago would were stuck on belief of a flat earth.
What?
One more time: NO ONE (other than the completely ignorant[1]) believed that the Earth was flat 500 years ago.

1 Given that we have bozos today who persist in that false belief.
 
Rubbish.

What?
One more time: NO ONE (other than the completely ignorant[1]) believed that the Earth was flat 500 years ago.

1 Given that we have bozos today who persist in that false belief.

And in my opinion thirty years from now our kids and grandchildren will probably laugh at the
exaggerated skepticism of our time period toward very good information such as what was given to us by
three year and ten month old near death experiencer Colton Burpo.
 
And in my opinion thirty years from now our kids and grandchildren will probably laugh at the
exaggerated skepticism of our time period toward very good information such as what was given to us by
three year and ten month old near death experiencer Colton Burpo.
There was/ is no information from Burpo.
(And it would appear the child, or, more likely, his father who wrote the book/ claims, was lying: e.g. no medical evidence that the boy was clinically dead and the fact that his story is so similar to a prior book/ claim that has been since admitted to be a fabrication).

And I fail to understand how the content of your post relates to me pointing out, for the second time, that you are wrong in thinking people thought the Earth was flat 500 years ago.
 
There was/ is no information from Burpo.
(And it would appear the child, or, more likely, his father who wrote the book/ claims, was lying: e.g. no medical evidence that the boy was clinically dead and the fact that his story is so similar to a prior book/ claim that has been since admitted to be a fabrication).

And I fail to understand how the content of your post relates to me pointing out, for the second time, that you are wrong in thinking people thought the Earth was flat 500 years ago.


I think that you are incorrect....
and my guess is that you are fearful of what little Colton Burpo reveals about one of the higher invisible dimensions of space and time.

To my thinking your fears are a little bit like the fears of people five centuries ago who believed in a flat earth and were fearful of the evidence for a round earth.... but.... I am biased due to my own beliefs.
 
Back
Top