That marijuana led anyone to tobacco or alcohol is actually irrelevant, because they are legal drugs. I want to know whether m leads people to other illegal drugs.
When a drug becomes illegal, the only people who use that drug are criminals. Err, something like that. And criminals are bad bad people, we all know.
The only other "illegal" drug I've ever used besides C. Sativa would be psilocybin mushrooms. I could definitely say that having used marijuana many many times made me more willing to try something like that, but it was equally
curiousity in something like that which would influence me. Mushrooms have a shamanic, spiritual quality, and have been used that way (along with similar substances) probably since the dawn of civilization. My mild interest in that kind of thing is probably more of a contributor to my trying them than anything else.
A close relative of mine, who has used many more drugs than I have, started smoking I believe before he was in high school. And I also do believe that tobacco was probably the first substance he ever used regularly.
And later on, he started powdering his prescription Ritalin tablets (for ADD) and snuffing them up the nose for what he still considers (though he doesn't use them anymore) one of the best highs ever! How awesome is that? His mommy and daddy payed for "medicine" that he was simply taking to get a high from.
And on tobacco, I also can recall that many of the so-called problem or "troubled" students I knew in school were smoking and drinking at a considerably younger age than most other people.
Overall, I don't think marijuana by itself can influence people to do harder drugs, if you want to call them that. I think there's usually a secondary factor.
I believe I have heard that its relative overall harmlessness is one reason people might think that it's a gateway. They may be lulled into thinking that every drug they've been warned away from will be just as harmless. But that's really weak reasoning, and that's not just my opinion.
The drug czars and propagandists, from what I can gather, want to simply call marijuana a harmful drug for vague reasons (like calling it a
gateway, which is pretty vague if you ask me!), link it with other, much more harmful drugs (crack, heroin) in one huge, terrifying, "pedophile"-like category, and hopefully keep the debate frozen. After all, who wants to support child-raping??!?!?!
What else can you expect from people who trumpet record-levels of drug arrests as a victory in the mostly fraudulent
war on drugs (if I remember correctly, Clinton did just that), instead of just an indication that either there are more users, or more users getting arrested? Or that an alcoholic who lives near a public school needs treatment, but a casual marijuana user who lives in the same neighborhood may just get a very serious jail sentence, just for living in a so-called drug-free zone? Apparently being a gateway drug with an absurdly low mortality rate is more serious than a legal drug with one of the deadliest track records in recorded history.
Some examples of "GATEWAYS":
Getting into a car is a
gateway for fatal accidents and vehicular homicide.
Eating at a restaurant (especially Taco Bell) is a
gateway to food poisoning.
Eating fast food of any kind is a
gateway to clogged arteries.
Taking FDA-approved anti-depressants (according to some) is a
gateway to possible suicide.
Owning a gun is a
gateway to someone getting killed with that gun.
Being a woman on a date is a
gateway to date-rape.
Being born is a
gateway to eventually dying, at some point.
Are those silly examples? Anyone have ideas for some other gateways, real or imagined, serious or silly?
Sorry for my long ramble. Goodbye.