The only way to throw something is by application of force. There is no such west-east force. If there were there would be all kinds of problems which do not exist. A ball on a flat level surface would not remain stationary. All of our science projects and experiments would go out the window. Literally. That's just for starters. You seem to have a vague sense of how a centrifuge works, except of course you are applying the force in the wrong direction. Worst of all you are denying the gravitational attraction that exists regardless of whether an object is in motion or not.
Only from the static gravitational field which is a function the two masses under the inverse-square law. You are stuck with this law, and couldn't repeal it, even if you were God.
There is no collision, and the mass of the Earth has nothing to do with what you said.
If this were remotely true, aircraft couldn't fall from the sky. You would see problems exactly the opposite of crashes. There would be nothing to bring them down, in fact. They would need to fire their engines opposite of the way the Osprey does, just to land. Plus, everything that hops would remain airborne indefinitely. The sky would be littered with orbiting kangaroo carcasses. By now they would have evolved into ground hugging forms with suction cups, like all other creatures. Everything kicked up by the wind would remain in the sky indefinitely. The air would be incredibly thick with debris from all past volcanism, etc. There would be no visible light in the sky. I presume it would be hotter than hell. Come to think of it, there could be no life on Earth, so forget the orbiting kangaroos. It would just be a dark hot hell with no one to discover the universal law of gravitation. And no Sci to post dingbat ideas. No ding, no bat, no ideas. Nada.
Incorrect. The amount of particles in the vicinity of the centroid of mass during accretion are all that matters.
None of that is true. Existing particles accrete due to gravity.
Incorrect. Anything that "sticks" to a planet does so according to the Law of Gravity.
Not on Earth. Meteors burn during their descent due to friction, and what's left gets buried in water of land. Of course there can be no collisions, inelastic or elastic once you repeal the law of gravity. All of physics breaks. Everything ends up in the sky and it's curtains.
Incorrect. Momentum arises from the kinetic energy of the particles that formed the planet. It's a question of conservation of energy - another law you want to overturn. Can't be done. Not even in a dead world.
Here is how to find the angular momentum of a planet.
Mass would make no difference, only the question of whether the object ever left the surface. The entire top of Mt St Helens would be floating in the sky, along with Pinatubo and every other eruption ever. Leaves would separate from trees and just hang there. Of course none of them would actually exist so that's a stretch. Water is massive but it would be stuck up in the sky. Make that a dark, hot parched earth with no dust. A rock with mud suspended above it. Also the atmosphere would have a lot carbon and nitrogen (probably methane- ammonia). Yeah, Hell on Earth.
Wait there's more - without gravitational attraction Earth could not form. No Sun, no planets, no galaxies - and no center of the galaxy at all. So wow the whole thing completely falls apart.
A clue perhaps? Are you Pincho. That's my guess. I'd like the free Sci T shirt given for being first to nail ya. :spank:
Yes, but it's entirely wrong.
The question is, do you see it the way actually Nature does it?
What is your game anyway, pard?
