Rather, yours.
Using your form of debate, even less so being Indian.
There are far beyond Lal and Gauthier - neither of which you have rebutted here, to be honest - but given your new, modified terms of debate, I see little reason to bring them up either, since you cannot give them an honest treatment. This is not unusual to your case, of course. I shall therefore continue on as I have been. You also need to illustrate my - as a non-theist - bias, while I have ample illustration of your own.
Not really all of these "histories" are linked in some way to the VHP. However, I studied history over 15 years ago, before the Hindu nationalist movement gained a foothold, so my sources were more accurate. You can believe it or not.