Do you read the introduction or preface when undertaking a work of non-fiction?
Background of the question: I, personally, became notorious for not reading introductions because, as a child, I was mostly subject to literary prefaces aimed mostly at telling us what a genius the author was, or the vague and useless introductions of large-survey textbooks (usually hardcover). In my theological studies, I've found that many introductions or prefaces are like literary prefaces, which merely expound on the genius of this or that guru.
However, in many--perhaps most--works of nonfiction, the introduction does help put the rest of the book into context. To read, for instance, Trout's Eastern Seeds, Western Soil, one finds that the introduction specifies the focus of the survey, so that one might be able to set aside certain conflicts that come up during reading ("But ... this person said this, and I don't see it included in that portion of the text, where it seems it should be.") Trout's book, for instance, is hardly comprehensive, but is meant as a general overview of the post-Hindu phenomenon that has so subtly affected American culture. Or, to read Basham's The Origins and Development of Classical Hinduism, we see a roadmap:
thanx,
Tiassa
Background of the question: I, personally, became notorious for not reading introductions because, as a child, I was mostly subject to literary prefaces aimed mostly at telling us what a genius the author was, or the vague and useless introductions of large-survey textbooks (usually hardcover). In my theological studies, I've found that many introductions or prefaces are like literary prefaces, which merely expound on the genius of this or that guru.
However, in many--perhaps most--works of nonfiction, the introduction does help put the rest of the book into context. To read, for instance, Trout's Eastern Seeds, Western Soil, one finds that the introduction specifies the focus of the survey, so that one might be able to set aside certain conflicts that come up during reading ("But ... this person said this, and I don't see it included in that portion of the text, where it seems it should be.") Trout's book, for instance, is hardly comprehensive, but is meant as a general overview of the post-Hindu phenomenon that has so subtly affected American culture. Or, to read Basham's The Origins and Development of Classical Hinduism, we see a roadmap:
So, anyway, who reads introductions or prefaces these days?The first chapter begins with an examination of the prehistorical religion of South Asia which dates from about 2700 to 1700 BCE. It is based principally on informed speculation from archaeological reports ....
Chapter 2 uses the latest, or tenth, book of the Rg-veda and the Atharva-veda, a somewhat later Vedic text, to launch into a discussion of hinduism's attempts to explain the origin of the world ....
Chapter 3 focuses on the further development of Hindu philosophical thought in the speculative literature of the Aranyakas and Upanisads .... (Basham, xiii)
thanx,
Tiassa