"Intelligent Design" Trying to Jump on the AI Bandwagon?

Really? Are these ID proponentsists or just regular YECs and OECs? Do you have a link with more about this?
More info. The incident was 2020, poster called "Rawmatt" A fabricated paper with the PLOS logo on it.

There is a 12 minute YouTube video, "that time a creationist faked a paper and why it matters."

I found out via Gutsick Gibbon but her videos are very long.
 
More info. The incident was 2020, poster called "Rawmatt" A fabricated paper with the PLOS logo on it.

There is a 12 minute YouTube video, "that time a creationist faked a paper and why it matters."

I found out via Gutsick Gibbon but her videos are very long.
RawMatt may be this nutter: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Matt-Nailor

An "ordained minister", allegedly, resemblance to Marilyn Manson notwithstanding........-_O

No sign he is associated with the Disco 'Tute however.
 
I am just trying to point out that faking and cheating are not limited to one group.
Two wrongs don't make a right. You shouldn't be saying "Well, let's just ignore that this paper, which was written by a guy whose views I'm sympathetic to, was faked. Let's change the subject and talk about some unrelated paper written by somebody else (maybe somebody who I don't like as much), and just forget all about my guy's fraud."
 
Two wrongs don't make a right. You shouldn't be saying "Well, let's just ignore that this paper, which was written by a guy whose views I'm sympathetic to, was faked. Let's change the subject and talk about some unrelated paper written by somebody else (maybe somebody who I don't like as much), and just forget all about my guy's fraud."
I am not saying ignore anything.I am not sympathetic to his views. Once again you misjudge me without knowing anything about me. It's just another attack the messenger if you don't like the message. Your description of my views is more of your egotistical bullshit.
 
I am not saying ignore anything.I am not sympathetic to his views. Once again you misjudge me without knowing anything about me. It's just another attack the messenger if you don't like the message. Your description of my views is more of your egotistical bullshit.
Then what was the "purpose" of you pointing out the obvious that "Creationists are not the only ones who fake results and papers"?
To what purpose are you saying "It is good to point out when you are focusing on one group."?

Either it is whataboutism, or an effort to derail the thread, or maybe an attempt to implicate bias in the treatment of people who believe certain crazy-ass shit - and by implication all other crazy-ass shit. Or maybe you really were just stating the bleedin' obvious.

Whatever the reason, please stop derailing the thread further, because even if not your intention, it is what your inanity is doing.

I thank you for your attention to this matter.
 
Back
Top