indignation (skinwalker)

O

outlandish

smoki'n.......
Registered Senior Member
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=1629550#post1629550

this is ridiculous.
i start a perfectly acceptable thread with the honest intention to have a proper,informative debate.
i right my previous wrongs, and include context/comments with the link, yet i suffer 2 points,a wrap on the knuckles for some moron's ignorance and persistance to flame.

but what hurts me most is the closure of the thread.

skin, i'll take the points, no worries, but for god's sake delete the flame posts but keep the thread open. theres nothing stopping you from doing that.
 
You made several insults and basically made an ass out of yourself interacting with another member who also didn't handle it well.

Behave or don't post in my forum. Period.
 
Create another thread. Start over from the beginning and don't give in to or start flames with other members.
 
If you would have PM'd me with your concerns and solutions, I would have reopened the thread.
 
SkinWalker said:
You made several insults and basically made an ass out of yourself interacting with another member who also didn't handle it well.

Behave or don't post in my forum. Period.
Click to expand...
i stood my ground, i did not instigate the flaming, merely responded to mikenostiic's ignorance.
yes i could have remained reticent and take the magnanimous option but why do the bigots and morons get away with it.

i was merely giving him a taste of his own medicine, also i made valid points.

delete the crap, but re open the thread.
 
skin:

Dear outlandish,

You have received a warning at SciForums.com.

Reason:
-------
Insulted Other Member(s)

Please do not refer to other members as "morons."
-------


skin, even i have a threshold.
dont make me out to be the one at fault here.
 
Dr. Zakir Naik has been called out many a time to have misrepresented Islam and the Quran. In one refutation, Naik proposes that the Big Bang is encapsulated in the Quran:

"Glorious Qur’an, in Surah Ambiya, Ch. 21, Verse No. 30, which says…. (Arabic).... Do not the unbelievers see…? …. (Arabic)…. ‘That the heavens and the earth were joined together, and we clove them asunder?’ Imagine this information which we came to know recently, the Qur’an mentions 14 hundred years ago."

The good doctor should have tried reading up on the Big Bang before attempting to demonstrate the above verse.
 
(Q) said:
Dr. Zakir Naik has been called out many a time to have misrepresented Islam and the Quran. In one refutation, Naik proposes that the Big Bang is encapsulated in the Quran:

"Glorious Qur’an, in Surah Ambiya, Ch. 21, Verse No. 30, which says…. (Arabic).... Do not the unbelievers see…? …. (Arabic)…. ‘That the heavens and the earth were joined together, and we clove them asunder?’ Imagine this information which we came to know recently, the Qur’an mentions 14 hundred years ago."

The good doctor should have tried reading up on the Big Bang before attempting to demonstrate the above verse.
Click to expand...

the bigbang theory is at best that: theory, no one states to conclusively have proof of knowledge of exactly how the universe was created, least of all you.
once again your trigger happy approach and desperation to to attack islam exposes your petty mindedness, and more importantly your ignorance.

forget about islam, you're not even knowledgeable about the bigbang or any other theories regarding the origin of the universe.
 
So, clearly Skinwalker was dead on in his assessment of you and your posts. You're not interested in discussion, but instead propagandizing your cult.
 
(Q) said:
So, clearly Skinwalker was dead on in his assessment of you and your posts.
Click to expand...
you're in no position to offer any authoritative view on what skins assesment about me may or may not be.

You're not interested in discussion, but instead propagandizing your cult.
Click to expand...
1) show where i have shown not to be interested in disussion
2)im not propagandizing anything.
the links are of people who are more authoritative and knowledgeable than you. the content is not my opinion,nor speculation,nor conjecture.
learn the meaning of words before using them willy nilly.

you clearly have a problem accepting opinions contrary to yours.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top