Let's be clear here. I don't think I'm a genius or all knowing or Einstein, despite any of your insinuations. I do think I know a fair bit of some bits (notice I don't say all or everything) of physics and mathematics and I'd say there's plenty of evidence to demonstrate that to any reasonable person. As such I have justified confidence in my understanding of some things.It's called a reflection on the obvious behaviour.
Some of those things happen to be things you like to wax lyrical about. The fact I'm confidence, with good reason, about some of these things isn't the same thing as arrogance. I also happen to think, again with good reason, I know and understand more physics and maths than you. I also happen to think, again with good reason, you know and understand less than you proclaim.
Let's actually look at the dictionary definition of arrogance : an attitude of superiority manifested in an overbearing manner or in presumptuous claims or assumptions
Now let's consider your behaviour. You present yourself as knowledgeable on material which you are not. You regularly needlessly overcomplicate things, such as trying to tell 14 year olds about commutation relations. You believe yourself knowledgeable enough due to pop science reading to handle undergraduate degrees with reasonable ease, when you can't do many high school level things. You write lengthy essays no one cares about with needless algebra you copied or mangled together to present an image of "I am doing real physics!".
So if arrogance is being overbearing and having an unjustified believe of ones superiority I don't think you're in a position to be throwing stones from your triple glazed glass house.
I think it's a little hypocritical that you call my behaviour out of order after mutilating my name (which is an infraction worthy thing in itself) using a certain 4 letter word many consider more offensive than the f word.will give you one word of advice, alphanumeri****, your behaviour is out of order.
I understand you're wound up, the fact you've fired off a few posts in quick succession is always a sign you're becoming more agitated and thinking of further snipes to post, but you're really not helping yourself behaving like that.
You are not showing modest or mod behaviour.
I don't think you're in a position to be evaluating people's adherence to the scientific mentality given your continual dishonesty and inability to accept corrections. Furthermore my posts here reflect little to nothing of what work I actually do. Today I've done a considerable amount of quantum mechanics work but no one would know that here since I don't speak about it.You are below the purity of real scientific adventure.
I can't think of a single action I've done as moderator which has had anything to do with Guest. And your sentence construction is terrible.You've lest embraced the finer points of your knightood and belowed your power to support the likes of Guest who James has already questioned whether there is a clique in itself and if he himself does not know what I mean, then I say this:
Ah the old "If two people have similar dislike of me then surely they are the same person. How else could I explain more than one person not liking me?" hack chestnut. Funk doesn't like you much either, do you think he's a sock of me? What about Cpt? Prom? Trippy? Alex? QH? Rpenner? Perhaps we're all in constant email communication plotting against you? You did after all accuse me of discussing you with Rpenner by PM or informing QH he was being talked about. Neither of which was true but I understand how you want to develop your persecution complex.It's clear that from James' post in university first year thread for me in the free thoughts, that Guest clearly has a strange, (Yet similar to your) attitude towards me.
Again, your sentence construction is terrible. Secondly, when was the last time you and I exchanged PMs other than when I told you to stop posting crap under your Mister guise? Saying 'every time' implies that we regularly talk about Guest, which we don't. We hardly communicate by PM at all anyway. And saying I 'quickly changed the subject" is also dishonest.Every time in private messages of Guest being a sock, you quickly changed the subject.
If we have ever discussed Guest by PM then it isn't regularly and hasn't occurred in considerable time. Furthermore I wouldn't have any need to change the subject, I am more than capable of answering any accusation you make with a direct response, just as I've responded to the accusations you made about me PM'ing or emailing other members about you. Guest is not my sock. I am not Guest's sock. I am not anyone's sock. No one is my sock. To the best of my knowledge none of the people who hold you in a dim light have or are socks. I know you're quite happy to register multiple accounts and misrepresent yourself but some of us do not need to do that. As my posts show I am more than capable of handling you with just this account.
You're becoming more and more desperate to throw something, anything, at me in the hopes it'll stick. Have you now given up trying to claim you only made a little mistake or two in your threads on the Dirac equation and Lagrangians, is that it? Are you now looking for something else to try to distract people away from your issues? Is lying about PM exchanges between us and accusations of sock accounts what you're going to try for a page or two of discussion before moving onto something else?