In dire need of answers

Ethernos D Grace

Registered Senior Member
If particle splits into two particles. Doesn't that violets the conservation of mass?if wormholes can be traversed by one world it just means infinite energy. If particle splits into two then that would mean 1 has Einstein and other that Einstein was never born which would lead to butterfly effect and each world is very different.
 
If particle splits into two particles. Doesn't that violets the conservation of mass?
What particle are you thinking of? What products does it split into? Be specific.

if wormholes can be traversed by one world it just means infinite energy.
How?

If particle splits into two then that would mean 1 has Einstein and other that Einstein was never born which would lead to butterfly effect and each world is very different.
Perhaps. but that's not science; that's speculation.
 
If particle splits into two particles. Doesn't that violets the conservation of mass?if wormholes can be traversed by one world it just means infinite energy. If particle splits into two then that would mean 1 has Einstein and other that Einstein was never born which would lead to butterfly effect and each world is very different.
Mass isn't conserved.
 
This person is yet another nutter, I'm afraid.

Close, but not quite.

• • •​

… and give them the benefit of the doubt.

That's more effort than it's worth. You've asked the straightforward science questions, but there is actually a third path, which in this case I'm very nearly expecting, so if I tell you to just wait for it, don't actually put any effort into the waiting.
 
If particle splits into two particles. Doesn't that violets the conservation of mass?if wormholes can be traversed by one world it just means infinite energy. If particle splits into two then that would mean 1 has Einstein and other that Einstein was never born which would lead to butterfly effect and each world is very different.

mass becomes irrelevant when there is energy in its place
conservation of "energy" ?

particle is torn in 2 by a black hole
Stephen Hawking radiation discovery


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation
Discovery
Hawking's discovery followed a visit to Moscow in 1973, where the Soviet scientists Yakov Zel'dovich and Alexei Starobinsky convinced him that rotating black holes ought to create and emit particles, while Russian physicist Vladimir Gribov believed that even a non-rotating black hole should emit radiation. When Hawking did the calculation, he found to his surprise that it was true.[9] In 1972, Jacob Bekenstein conjectured that the black holes should have an entropy,[10] where by the same year, he proposed no-hair theorems. Bekenstein's discovery and results are commended by Stephen Hawking, which also led him to think about radiation due to this formalism.

According to the physicist Dmitri Diakonov, there was an argument between Zeldovich and Vladimir Gribov at the Zeldovich Moscow 1972–1973 seminar. Zeldovich believed that only a rotating black hole could emit radiation, while Gribov believed that even a non-rotating black hole emits radiation due to the laws of quantum mechanics.[11][12] This account is confirmed by Gribov's obituary in the Physics-Uspekhi by Vitaly Ginzburg and others.[13][14]
Black hole evaporation
When particles escape, the black hole loses a small amount of its energy and therefore some of its mass (mass and energy are related by Einstein's equation E = mc2). Consequently, an evaporating black hole will have a finite lifespan. By dimensional analysis, the life span of a black hole can be shown to scale as the cube of its initial mass,[17][18]: 176–177  and Hawking estimated that any black hole formed in the early universe with a mass of less than approximately 1015 g would have evaporated completely by the present day.[19]
 
If particle splits into two particles. Doesn't that violets the conservation of mass?
Quite possibly. This is not a problem, though, since mass isn't the important conserved quantity. That would be energy.
if wormholes can be traversed by one world it just means infinite energy.
Why make proclamations you have no capacity or intention of trying to support with argument or evidence? Isn't that just a waste of everybody's time?

You said you wanted answers, but here you are presuming to give answers of your own. And based on what? What's the point?
If particle splits into two then that would mean 1 has Einstein and other that Einstein was never born which would lead to butterfly effect and each world is very different.
Try to get your thoughts in order before posting again. This is all very stream-of-consciousness, flitting randomly from one topic to another, with no clear direction or purpose.

Try to formula a clear question. Don't assume you know the answer before you ask the question. Try one topic at a time.

Good luck.
 
Back
Top