I wouldn't go as far as to say that they control aging. If memory servers, the whole brouhaha about Dolly aging prematurely was that her telomeres were shortened. However, she seems to be aging quite naturally.Originally posted by Cris
While it is only mentioned, almost just in passing, the comment about resetting the telomeres I think is the most interesting. These effectively control the aging process and if we could undergo full body treatment in the future using this cloning technology then true rejuvenation might become a reality in our lifetimes.
I think you have a problem here. A cloned human will still be human in every possible manner and will deserve the same rights as ‘originals’. The only difference between an original and a clone would be the mechanism used to kick-start the manufacturing process. Once begun then the processes are identical. To consider cloned humans as somehow inferior humans that can be considered expendable is a grotesque idea.i think cloning has great future,i am still waiting for the day to come when our clones will go into space probes without any original member of species being hurt.
I’m hesitant to state this as I can’t believe anyone could consider this a serious suggestion, but are you suggesting that we grow clones of ourselves so that we can harvest their organs as replacements for ourselves?although i think there's gonna be a problem regarding their place in our society,but surely they provide a sure shot and effective way of biological experiments,which otherwise couldnt be achieved.we wont have any problems such as organ shortage etc.
Everyone, including the politicians, have erroneously jumped on the reproductive cloning issue and have missed the whole point about the ACT breakthrough. The intent and desire is to create stem cells. These are fabulous cells that can be nudged in any direction to produce any type of cell, e.g. heart cells, liver cells, skin cells, etc. You get the idea. The real value here is that if a person has some form of disease where their current cells are misbehaving then stem cells produced by cloning technology can be used to repair the damage without any problems of rejection.when look at the other side i smell sharks.i think later on (as in almost all cases)its going to become an ethical issue rather than our own techno-advancement,people will forget the genius behind cloning.people who dont know a bit about the whole process will raise issues viz problems regarding their adjustments with society etc.
Can’t believe you are asking such questions. They’ll be just like any other adopted child, or maybe not even that indirect. Remember that once the embryo has begun to divide then it would need to be placed into a living womb for it to continue to grow into a normal child. The birth would be normal like any other and no one will need to know that the child is cloned until it grows older and takes on identical appearances to the donor. And even then that might not be obvious if the donor was 30 years old say at the time that the donor cell was submitted.Cloning stem cells, human organs etc ok, but whole people? What will they be used for? Who will they belong to?
Wow you are way out there aren’t you? And why not? Why do we have to remain in these simplistic, limited and poorly designed biological shells? Let’s explore – there should be no limits to human imagination and creativity.Will there come a time when human/animal hybrids are commercially produced for fun and pleasure? Minotaur calves and Pegasus ponies, terrier hunks and Kitekat pussycat? i can really see it happening you know.
Doom and gloom. You are a terrible pessimist.Bad and good with everything, it's inevitable, the knowledge is out. Sinister is the future.
Why? As Cris is doubtless sick of pointing out, a cloned human being is a human being. You don't need laws to protect people with big ears or who came about via IVF, so why are clones different?Originally posted by Ana
Maybe politicians and lawmakers should focus more on protecting the rights of cloned humans since this seems to be inevitable
I doubt this will be a problem; at least as you put it here. If resources are scarce, they'll become more expensive. If there are a million kids in the world and only a thousand babysitters, then people who like going out on a Friday night are necessarily going to be reluctant to have more sprogs. Unless, of course, it's so they can babysit their younger siblings.we will find ourselves with too many of us to handle...and we have to consider the possibility of running out of natural resources faster than anticipated.
There isn't. It's like gravity; it's just there.some of my concerns with this whole issue are that there is a reason why natural selection is in place
I don't think legislation has ever discouraged funny ideas.Originally posted by Ana
WE know they will be just humans but I'm talking about people who are ignorant and will try to use the technology for inhumane purposes.....key word: TRY...and perhaps legislation will prevent or at least discourage any "funny ideas."
The whole point about slavery in the US was that to many people, blacks didn't look human. Intelligent men spent years debating whether they were human, and some who believed them to be human debated how inferior they were. Equally, women are demonstably different to men (woohoo!). Put a clone up against a wall with five others, and no-one would be able to pick him/her out.If what you say is absolutely true about not needing any laws because it will be obvious that cloned humans are just like everyone else...."created equal" so to speak, then why the hell did we have to make ammendments to the Constitution (here in the U.S. anyway) to allow women to vote? Why did we have a civil war to give African-Americans freedom? Didn't they look human? Like I said, "just a thought."
Without gravity, there'd be no universe as we know it. But that wasn't my point. Natural selection isn't there for a reason; it's just there. Like gravity, it's nice that we have it - we wouldn't be here without it - but that doesn't mean it's there for a reason. In your earlier post you said "Cloning might be used to alter our genes or just simply cure illnesses that would not be cured otherwise". This has been going on for millennia; ever since Og discovered that if he rubbed a plant over a wound in his leg, he might not die an agonising death from gangrene (or "ug").And your little "gravity" comment -- what if it weren't there? Any problems you could forsee that might affect our quality of life?