If the concept of virtual particles is abandoned, that means the standard model would also have to be abandoned, but unfortunately you are just to goddamn stupid to know that.
The evidence in this post so far says it is you who does not understand particle physics. And of course reading reputable links and books etc, are where knowledge is gained. In actual fact evidence again on this forum, [and others] always points to alternative hypothesis pushers, as the source of those that would like to denigrate reputable links and books, obviously since such reputable material in near all cases, actually show up the pseudoscientific nature of these alternative hypothesis and the "would be's if they could be's" that push them.
I would also suggest you gain not only some knowledge, but also understanding of the current accepted particle model of physics before attempting to come up with some "made up physics"
Obviously also you do not have access of the many state of the art particle accelerators and other experiments around the globe, yet you sit there in all your apparent glory and try to deride it.
I see you as another forum joke.
lovely standard model!
every 1 is happy about it.
except 1 dummy, me!
The reverse is obviously true as far as who is and who isn't a liar.Ha ha, another liar. You can only copy and paste, and in that way demonstrate your knowledge.
You did not so far demonstrate understanding. What about your magic sky daddy, is he virtual?
The reverse is obviously true as far as who is and who isn't a liar.
You keep forgetting this thread is in pseudoscience.
LOL what a buffoon.Go on believing in Santa Claus. He is also virtual.
The only lies here are the ones you're telling, such as protons not being made of quarks and other stupidly ignorant drivel.
Holy crap that is perfect, Arlich and jcc, the dynamic duo of truth seekers.Exactly! The only person here who is sincerely seeking for the truth.
So why do you keep throwing a tantrum whenever someone explains the composition of protons using the quark model?Liar, I never said that protons are not made of quarks.
Are you some sort of idiot? You don't seem to have any idea what you have even written.Liar, I never said that protons are not made of quarks.
It is time this piece of crap goes down the drain to the cesspool. It started out as absurd and has somehow gotten more absurd.
Are you some sort of idiot? You don't seem to have any idea what you have even written.![]()
Looks like you are the only liar here, or maybe you are just an idiot and don't realize what you even saying.Liar, I never said that protons are not made of quarks.
There is the evidence that you are a liar, but like I said maybe it is just that you are an idiot. Hey maybe it is both; idiot liar!I am coming to a conclusion that the Big Bang was a fusion reaction where electrons and positrons fused to form hydrogen.
IdiotThat is because of your lies this thread degenerated into flame wars. That is quite an achievement considering what is
the title of the thread. Again I wish to good luck figuring out the greatest secrets of the universe.......perhaps Santa Claus
is helpful.
idiot.You have no idea of anything except lies.