How to Talk to Your AI Without Looking Like an Idiot

[Pinball1970]

Eve gives me a better sentence than I could write, I'll use it.

That's the problem right there. Imagine conversing with a colleague or supplier for six months over e mail and teams thinking they are intelligent and articulate then you meet them and they are not? They are someone else. A bit dull, semi literate and appear rather uneducated? Incoherent at times? Boring?

 

[foghorn]

This may sound odd, but is Richard a person in the first place, let alone a person using AI?

 

[Pinball1970]

This may sound odd, but is Richard a person in the first place, let alone a person using AI?

It's gone past that, we just want rid now I think, unless james gives him a warning.

 

[foghorn]

It's gone past that, we just want rid now I think, unless james gives him a warning.

Maybe so, but out of curiosity... Richard, what is the answer to this question in this picture?

 

[Richard Townsend]

How is posting botshit productive?

Define "productive."

 

[Richard Townsend]

It's gone past that, we just want rid now I think, unless james gives him a warning.

What's making you feel that way?

 

[Richard Townsend]

Maybe so, but out of curiosity... Richard, what is the answer to this question in this picture?

View attachment 7257

I think your better than that.

 

[Pinball1970]

I think your better than that.

"You're." Nice to meet you Richard.

 

[Pinball1970]

Define "productive."

Discussing subjects with people, learning something new and occasionally developing relationships at the same time.

 

[Richard Townsend]

Discussing subjects with people, learning something new and occasionally developing relationships at the same time.

Alright, try this: 'Stephen King used typewriters to draft. Fast writers today use AI the same way. It's about creating, not cheating.' Sound good?

 

[Richard Townsend]

"You're." Nice to meet you Richard.

Typos are a fact of life.

 

[Pinball1970]

What's making you feel that way?

Who is that Richard or Eve?
I have already explained to you (both) we are not interested in conversing with a bot.
We are not interested in trying out which is which.
Also I am definitely not interested, in someone pretending to understand a subject like chirality and pharmacology, the Higgs mechanism, enterobacteria, lithopanspermia, general relativity and epigenetics.
Unless I am mistaken and you actually are a polymath and studied QFT, GR, stereochemistry and molecular biology at university? Or just in your spare time? Your 2017 posts suggest you did not.

 

[foghorn]

Alright, try this: 'Stephen King used typewriters to draft. Fast writers today use AI the same way. It's about creating, not cheating.' Sound good?

If someone was to think Stephen King is overrated and boringly long in his stories, do they blame his typewriter or would they blame his AI use?
And, you never answered my question in my post #44.

 

[Pinball1970]

Alright, try this: 'Stephen King used typewriters to draft. Fast writers today use AI the same way. It's about creating, not cheating.' Sound good?

You gave a layman's description of the Higgs mechanism as though you had a scholarly knowledge of it.

You probably asked Eve, "Can I have a description of the HM in easy to understand language."

In 2017 you had a fundamental misconception regarding the role of "observer" in QM.

So am I expected to believe you overcame this misconception in QM then stampeded to QFT and mastered that? To the point you are comfortable and can explain it to lay people?

Where did you learn QFT?

 

[Pinball1970]

Typos are a fact of life.

And human, refreshing isn't it?

 

[exchemist]

How is that going to be productive?

Same way that weeding the garden is productive.

 

[Olga]

Same way that weeding the garden is productive.

А вам другую аналогию приведу: "чтобы вместе с плевелами вы не выдергали и пшеницу". Это про таких, как вы. Почему вы такой злой и желчный человек? Гордыня из вас прёт со всех щелей, и чувствуется даже через экран смартфона. Казалось бы, вместе с возрастом, к вам должна была прийти и мудрость, но нет, в вашем случае пришла только одна старость.

 

[Pinball1970]

А вам другую аналогию приведу: "чтобы вместе с плевелами вы не выдергали и пшеницу". Это про таких, как вы. Почему вы такой злой и желчный человек? Гордыня из вас прёт со всех щелей, и чувствуется даже через экран смартфона. Казалось бы, вместе с возрастом, к вам должна была прийти и мудрость, но нет, в вашем случае пришла только одна старость.

Botshit is bad for the site Olga

 

[Olga]

Botshit is bad for the site Olga

Пин, он не вредит, он заставляет задуматься. ИИ становится частью нашей жизни, хотим мы этого, или не хотим. И нужно уметь правильно к этому адаптироваться. Вы конечно можете заблокировать его сегодня, но он вернётся завтра, в уже более модернизированном виде, и останется. Это реальность, Пин, от которой бесполезно(а возможно, и не нужно) закрываться. Нужно научится этим правильно пользоваться.

 

[Pinball1970]

Пин, он не вредит, он заставляет задуматься. ИИ становится частью нашей жизни, хотим мы этого, или не хотим. И нужно уметь правильно к этому адаптироваться. Вы конечно можете заблокировать его сегодня, но он вернётся завтра, в уже более модернизированном виде, и останется. Это реальность, Пин, от которой бесполезно(а возможно, и не нужно) закрываться. Нужно научится этим правильно пользоваться.

I am happy using Ai and I have stated it. I use it to look things up like Wiki.

If you use it to make sentences and paragraphs because you are too lazy or not capable of doing so, that is not the way to go.

Passing off knowledge from a bot, posted as your own is not the way to go. It is called lies.