Beaconator
Valued Senior Member
OkStop. Just stop.
OkStop. Just stop.
Without those other elements the heat would not be enough to produce fusion.
Without those other elements the heat would not be enough to produce fusion.
the essence of anything determines what it will be. Not the sum of our scientific knowledge.
Since stainless steel isn’t magnetic.Stop. Just stop.
Don’t those require neutrinos?Wrong. Fusion at the core of the sun can occur with H1 (the common isotope of Hydrogen) via the proton-proton chain, because the pressure and temp is high enough. No other elements are required.
All man-made fusion reactions( such as those those in thermonuclear weapons), require H2 (deuterium) or H3(tritium), as they have less stringent requirements for fusion.
I have no clue as to where you are getting your ideas from.
Neutrinos are a by-product of fusion, and are produced during the first stage of the proton-proton chain when one of two merging protons converts to a neutron. They are not needed to initiate the merger, and just leave afterwards.Don’t those require neutrinos?
Neutrinos are a by-product of fusion, and are produced during the first stage of the proton-proton chain when one of two merging protons converts to a neutron. They are not needed to initiate the merger, and just leave afterwards.
how does a proton transforming into a neutron constitute fusion?
neutrinos can go through mountains like many other quantum particles
from hydrogen to helium has to be the largest gap in the process of fusion
I imagine the addition of electrons from hydrogen to helium undergoes a similar processTwo protons (H -1 atoms stripped of their electrons) collide, to from a H-2 nucleus by one of them being converted to a neutron through emission of a positron and neutrino
A proton collides with this, fusing into a HE-3 nucleus and emitting a gamma ray
Two HE-3 nuclei (each formed by the above process), collide leaving 1 HE-4 nucleus and two free protons.
Those protons go on to either collide with another proton (stage 1) or an already formed H-2) molecule
Hydrogen to helium is the easiest fusion process to cause. The big obstacle is getting the nuclei close enough for the short range nuclear bonds to overcome the electrostatic repulsion of the positively charged nuclei. Elements higher on the periodic table have more protons per nucleus, thus a greater repulsion to overcome.
What distinguishes Hydrogen from Helium is the number of protons in the nucleus. The Sun is a ball of plasma, a mix of nuclei and electrons that is so hot that the electrons roam free not attached to any atom. So what you have are ionized atoms and free electrons. Some of these escape as the solar wind, and once they lose enough energy recombine to form neutral atoms.I imagine the addition of electrons from hydrogen to helium undergoes a similar process
Nope. You're not.I’m going to try it anyway. No matter what you say.
I sure am. Not like it’s a million dollar ventureNope. You're not.
Like the Markov chain it requires a beginning and an end. A stochastic process that depends on anything but random variables. I am eliminating randomness in the processes such as brownian motion. A fluid template confined in the most curious magnetic element to ever align itself.Take all elements below iron and place them in an iron box.
world energy crisis averted
You seem to be having a psychotic episode. Take your meds.Like the Markov chain it requires a beginning and an end. A stochastic process that depends on anything but random variables. I am eliminating randomness in the processes such as brownian motion. A fluid template confined in the most curious magnetic element to ever align itself.
I acknowledge some of the statements appear counter intuitive, but these are the closest models we have to perfection on an elemental level.
fission and fusion only serve as a measuring point for quantum affects. We understand the process but not the cause nor the finishing mark.
to place all fissionable elements in the same box can only allow us to understand fusion at a broader level than we do today.
Will they undergo fusion? Probably not, but it is the worst case scenario.
and still I have a hunch this will be a harder experiment than Edison’s lightbulb
. We only get one chance out of a thousand options and the penalty is death by spontaneous reactions.
Einstein’s knowledge of both light and neutrons can’t be a coincidence.
I am. They don’t help unsee what one other healthcare person saw and told me to disregard.You seem to be having a psychotic episode. Take your meds.
There are still things we don’t know. This is definitively one of them. And I’m not one to let curiosity get the best of me. I’ll let something that makes no sense slide but something that has logical validity towards the unknown… then I don’t care what language you speak.You seem to be having a psychotic episode. Take your meds.
Wrong.And Einstein believed in god
Your wrong about everything. And can prove nothing.Wrong.