How tall are you ?
- Thread starter Enmos
- Start date
I know someone who does.
Berengei pseudoensis
I posted once a picture of it on sciforums. The cut off version. But it was only 30cm under a microscope.
Do the conversion. 30cm metric= ........inches....i.e a.... imperial
Ouch! the ole penis reduction,...I'm still smarting!
In regards to poll:
Now we just need to apply the heights given to an IQ test and we'd have something to generate stereotypes with.
In regards to current off-topic trend:
I think there might be a great pruning coming up shortly on this thread (and a few others) since the topic keeps being mistaken for an excuse to avoid it.
Now we just need to apply the heights given to an IQ test and we'd have something to generate stereotypes with.
In regards to current off-topic trend:
I think there might be a great pruning coming up shortly on this thread (and a few others) since the topic keeps being mistaken for an excuse to avoid it.
ironically babies are smarter than adults when we consider their brain mass to body mass index.
It's not like it is a particularly scientific or important thread to start with.
Please don't be too precious.
Some of us actually had a shitful day and the crap with Bells has left me feeling like being a little frivolous by way of regaining some sanity.( it's my way)
Thanks.
Actually, I have hidden small nuggets of scientific knowledge in at least 20% of my posts in this thread.
It's just that you don't recognize it without pre-knowledge.
:shrug:
It's just that you don't recognize it without pre-knowledge.
:shrug:
Cheers monkey, I actually do the same although Ii'm not as scientific as you so I probably run at about 10 %
I love your style, it's the only way I can absorb!
I'm only ever on here late at night and long posts tend to do my tired eyes and head in.( I still read them on occasion though)
Stryder, this is serious, please understand there are different people with different wants and needs around here.
and moreover, since the moderator team mostly consists of non-scientists they actually often fail to see the scientific content. :cheers: :itold:
It's a stupid, trivial, pointless, worthless, eminently spammable topic. I found the stuff about hooves and horses far more interesting. I learnt something about the development of cloven hooves.
Which accidentally makes the thread worth something, at least.
Which accidentally makes the thread worth something, at least.
I'm a non-scientist, my elitist retard friend. But that didn't stop me from observing a dull thread flare briefly into something vaguely interesting.
personally I am still boycotting sciforums.
No effort regarding serious science on my behalf.
Now, unfortunately my brain is trained for seance and stuffed with it. As much as I would like to delete it all, the biological brain is not a hardrive that can be deleted at a whim.
I'm stuck with it. It seeps out. I am fighting a battle with free will and losing it.
seepage is a tricky phenomenon. allow too much seepage and your principles are compromised. Allow to little seepage and the pressure will result in a breach, aka [ENC]hissy fit[/ENC].